“Ignorance of the law is no
excuse” is a legal maxim and has been recognized and acknowledged by
both State and federal courts. We thus require citizens to apprise
themselves not only of statutory language but also of legislative
history, subsequent judicial construction, and underlying legislative
purposes (People v. Grubb (1965) 63 Cal. 2d 614, 620 [47 Cal. Rptr.
772, 408 P.2d 100]). (See generally Amsterdam, The Void-For-Vagueness
Doctrine in the Supreme Court (1960) 109 U. Pa. L.Rev. 67.) Walker v. Superior
Court (1988) 47 Cal.3d 112 People v. Grubb (1965)
63 Cal. 2d 614
Fraud is either actual or constructive. Hargrove v.
Henderson (1930) 108 Cal.App. 667
Fraud includes all surprise, trick, cunning, dissembling, and unfair
ways by which another is deceived. Wells v. Zenz
(1927) 83 Cal.App. 137
To defraud means to deprive of right, either by procuring something by
deception or artifice, or by appropriating something wrongfully. People v. Wilkins (1924)
67 Cal.App 758
Equity always views with strictness the business dealings of a man with
one who stand ins a position of dependence or confidence to him,
whether that relationship is voluntarily assumed or is imposed by
operation of law. Ruhl v. Mott
(1898) 120 Cal. 668
Undue influence is a species of constructive fraud which the court will
not undertake to define by any fixed principles lest the definition
itself point out the path by which it may be evaded. Sparks v. Sparks (1950)
101 Cal.App.2d 129
If there is a duty to speak because of a trust or confidential
relationship, failure to do so is a species of fraud for which equity
may afford relief. Blair v. Mahon
(1951)104 Cal.App2d 44
Fraud arises out of a breach of duty or obligation which one owes to
another. Brady v. Bartlett
(1880) 56 Cal. 350
Constructive fraud in its generic sense comprises all acts, omissions,
and concealments involving a breach of legal or equitable duty, trust,
or confidence, resulting in damage to another. Arbuckle Estate
(1950) 98 Cal.App.2d 562
Extrinsic or collateral fraud has been defined to be actual fraud, such
that there is on the part of the person chargeable with it the carrying
out of a purpose to defraud. Flood v. Tempelton
(1907) 152 Cal. 148
Fraud may consist in the misrepresentation or the concealment of
material facts, and may be inferred from the circumstances and
condition of the parties. Belden v. Henriques
(1857) 8 Cal. 87 Kallgren v. Steele
(1955) 131 Cal.App.2d 43
All deceitful practices in depriving or endeavoring to deprive another
of his known right by means of some artful device or plan, contrary to
the rules of common honesty, are fraud. Newman v. Smith (1888) 77 Cal.
22
23
Cal.Jur.2d
FRAUD
AND
DECEIT
II.
MISREPRESENTATIONS
A.
AS TO EXISTING FACTS
p.
27 - 32
11.
In General; Elements of Actionable Fraud. - Generally, to
establish a cause of action for fraud or deceit based on
misrepresentation, the plaintiff must show that the representation
was as to a material fact; that it was false and known to be false
by the party making it, or else made recklessly, or without
reasonable grounds for believing its truth; that the representation
was made with intent to induce th other party to do or refrain from
doing some act; that it was relied on by the other party, that is,
that such other party was actually mislead and deceived and induced
by it to act or refrain from acting the latter was ignorant of the
falsity or the representation and reasonably believe it to be true;
and that he thereby suffered damage or injury. The absence of any
one of these elements is generally fatal to a recovery.
A fraudulent
misrepresentation is an antecedent statement made as an inducement to
the contract but is not a part of element of the contract. Griswold v.
Morrison 53 Cal.App. 93 Rutherford v.
Standard Eng. Corp. 88 Cal.App.2d 554
12. Statements of Fact and Opinion. - It is a general rule that, in order
to constitute actionable
fraud, the misrepresentation must be of fact, past or present, or the
affirmation of a future even as a fat, as distinguished form mere
opinion, intention or promise. Nevertheless,
the general rule that an action for deceit may not be fonded on the
mere expression of an opinion is the subject to qualification
modifications that are as important as the rule itself. ...and
action for deceit will lie for the expression of a dishonest opinion
to one entitled to rely on it, as where the one making it has
superior knowledge or special information concerning the subject
matter, or where a confidential relationship exists between the
parties. Furthermore, and expression of opinion is an actionable
misrepresentation where it misrepresents the facts on which it is
based or implies the existence of facts that are nonexistent. And
when an expression of opinion is asserted as an existing fat material
to the transaction and has a reasonable tendency to induce the other
party to rely on it as fact, it becomes the assertion of an existing
fact within the general rule as to fraudulent representations.
MANDATE.
A command, order, or direction, written or oral,
which court is authorized to give and person
is bound to obey. Silverman v. Seneca Realty Co.,
276 N.Y.S. 466, 154 Misc. 35. A judicial command or precept
proceeding from a court or judicial officer, directing the proper
officer to enforce a judgment, sentence, or decree. Seaman v. Clarke,
69 N.Y.S. 1002, 60 'App.Div. 416; Horton v. State, 63 Neb. 34, 88
N.W. 146.
A
precept or order issued upon the decision of an appeal or writ of
error, directing action to be taken, or disposition to be made of
case, by inferior court. Egbert v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co., 50
Okl. 623, 151 P. 228, 230.
In
some of the state jurisdictions, the name "mandate" has
been substituted for "mandamus" as the formal title of that
writ. Chrisman v. Superior Court in and for Fresno County, 63 Cal.
App. 477, 219 P. 85, 86; Davies v. Board of Com'rs of Nez Perce
County, 26 Idaho, 450, 143 P. 945, 946.
A
bailment of property in regard to which the bailee engages to do some
act without reward. Story, Bailm. § 137; Maddock v. Riggs, 106 Kan.
808, 190 P. 12, 16, 12 A.L.R. 216.
Mandates
and deposits closely resemble each other; the distinction being that
in mandates the care and service are the principal, and the custody
the accessory, while in deposits the custody is the principal thing,
and the care and service are merely accessory. Story, Bailm. § 140.
A
contract by which a lawful business is committed to the management of
another, and by him undertaken to be performed gratuitously. The
mandatary is bound to the exercise of slight diligence, and is
responsible for gross neglect. Richardson v. Futrell, 42 Miss. 525;
Williams v. Conger, 8 S.Ct. 933, 125 U.S. 397, 31 L.Ed. 778.
A
mandate, procuration, or letter of attorney is an act by which one
person gives power to another to transact for him and in his name one
or several affairs. Black's
Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 1951
OBLIGATION.A generic word, derived from
the Latin substantive "obligatio," having many, wide, and
varied meanings, according to the context in which it is used.
Enyeart v. City of Lincoln, 136 Neb. 146, 285 N.W. 314, 318. That
which a person is bound to do or forbear; any duty imposed by law,
promise, contract, relations of society, courtesy, kindness, etc.
Goodwin v. Freadrich, 135 Neb. 203, 280 N.W. 917, 923. Duty.
Rucks-Brandt Const. Co. v. Price, 165 Oki. 178, 23 P.2d 690. Duty
imposed by law. Helvering v. British-American Tobacco Co., C.C.A., 69
F.2d 528, 530. Law or duty binding parties to perform their
agreement. An undertaking to perform. State v. Citrus County, 116
Fla. 676, 157 So. 4, 97 A.L.R. 431. That which constitutes a legal or
moral duty and which renders a person liable to coercion and
punishment for neglecting it; a word of broad meaning, and the
particular meaning intended is to be gained by consideration of its
context. An obligation or debt may exist by reason of a judgment as
well as an express contract, in either case there being a legal duty
on the part of the one bound to comply with the promise. Schwartz v.
California Claim Service, 52 Cal.App.2d 47, 125 P.2d 883, 888.
Liabilities created by contract or law, Rose v. W. B. Worthen Co.,
186 Ark. 205, 53 S.W.2d 15, 16, 85 A.L.R. 212; or tort. Exchange Bank
v. Ford, 3 P. 449, 451, 7 Colo. 314. As legal term word originally
meant a sealed bond, but it now extends to any certain written
promise to pay money or do a specific thing. Lee v. Kenan,
C.C.A.Fla., 78 F.2d 425, 100 A.L.R. 869. A formal and binding
agreement or acknowledgment of a liability to pay a certain sum or do
a certain thing. United States v. One Zumstein Briefmarken Katalog
1938, D.C. Pa., 24 F.Supp. 516, 519. Black's
Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 1951
Project Veritas Exposes Pfizer's Gain-of-Function Research
In order to continue peddling an
endless stream of new high-profit
“vaccines” on the public, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer is engaging
in “directed evolution” projects designed to “mutate”
the virus on purpose.
Project Veritas learned all this
in another undercover bombshell
interview, this time with Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer’s Director
of Research and Development, Strategic Operations, and mRNA
Scientific Planner. Walker revealed that Pfizer is intentionally
trying to spread new “variants” and “subvariants” of covid in
order to create and sell new injections.
“One of the things we’re
exploring is, like, why don’t we
just mutate it [covid] ourselves so we could create – preemptively
develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re going
to do that though, there’s a risk of, like, as you could imagine –
no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating fucking viruses.”
Walker urged the interviewer:
“don’t tell anyone, promise you
won’t tell anyone.” He then proceeded to reveal how Pfizer is
going about trying to mutate covid using primates. (Related: In 2021,
Project Veritas blew
the lid on Facebook’s global censorship of “vaccine
hesitancy”.)
“The way it [the experiment]
would work is that we put the virus
in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each
other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
“You have to be very controlled
to make sure that this virus
[covid] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes
everywhere,” he added. “Which, I suspect, is the way that the
virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this
virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullshit.”
Directed Evolution = INTENTIONAL UPDATING, RECONFIGURING, ENHANCEMENT Gain of Function = INTENTIONAL UPDATING, RECONFIGURING, ENHANCEMENT
Call it what you want using any “sophisticated sounding” words you
want, it doesn’t change the fact that pharmaceutical companies are
modifying chemical compounds to be more of what they started out
as.
At this point, given all the reports over the past 2.5 years about
adverse effects, including horrific and sudden death, of the chemical
compounds called “vaccines”, it should be clear the chemical compounds
called “vaccines” don’t prevent what they were ostensibly designed to
prevent: COVID.
Given all the reports, the chemical compound doesn’t prevent the
vaccinated party from getting whatever that is. In short
it’s ineffective, yet the pharmaceutical companies want to enhance the
inefficiency of their products while at the same time touting their
efficiency of prevention of receiving and spreading the purported virus
named COVID.
Fraud is demonstrable. The fraud is actionable.
Politicians, actors, sports figures, news media talking heads, friends
and neighbors and family members are propagating inaccurate information
as if they know for a fact what they’re talking about. The
contemporary term for fraud or deceit is “gas lighting”.
The simple three letter word for it is: lie.
Another word for lie is propaganda. During the second world
war there was a famous Japanese “propaganda” actor was Tokyo
Rose. The famous German “propaganda” actor was Lord Haw
Haw. Fact is blended with fiction and the listener or
viewer is required to determine.
Pharmaceutical companies pay for ads to place on COMMERCIAL television
networks. Viewers of the COMMERCIAL television networks see
the pharmaceutical ads. The ads are repeated through out the day
and night. The ads pay the salaries and benefits of the TV
hosts and news reporters.
The objective of the ads is to induce the viewer to believe they’re ill
and require the merchandise the pharmaceutical companies manufacture.
Without customers, sick & diseased people, pharmaceutical company
employees do not get paid, executives do not get bonuses, the stock
holders get no return on their investment and the pharmaceutical
company goes bankrupt.
Fraud and deception are motivating factors regarding the pharmaceutical ads.
Notice there are NO COMMERCIALS for not using pharmaceutical
products. There’s no bicycle ads. There’s no jump
rope ads. There’s no calisthenic ads. There’s no ads for
non-junk food, per say. There’s no ads for organic fruits and
vegetables. There’s no ads for cage free chicken eggs.
There’s no ads for non-corporate chain restaurants that offer a
vegetarian menu. All the ads for restaurants are meat
oriented.
There’s a massive and observable disparity between doing health related
activity and disease related activity promoted in the FOR PROFIT
COMMERCIALS. Notice the number of MEDICINE ads compared to
anything else other than cars and beer, and cereal marketed to
children.
Why is sugar in nearly everything? Why is high fructose corn syrup in nearly everything?
When you go to the grocery store notice the disparity between
nonorganic and organic fruits and vegetables in the produce
department. Why does organic milk and orange and other juices
cost more than nonorganic milk and orange and other juices when less
chemicals are used for the organic finished product? Why
does pasturized (boiled) fruit juice cost more than the non-pasturized
(boiled) variants when that step is left out of the manufacturing
process?
Why do the non-meat Subway sandwiches cost more than the meat sandwiches?
I’m opening this with a
bombshell. A new article posted in the
Armed Forces Press is titled: BREAKING:
DOD CONTROLLED COVID ‘VACCINES’ FROM THE START UNDER NATIONAL
SECURITY PROGRAM – LIED THE ENTIRE TIME – Were NEVER ‘Safe and
Effective’. The title says it all. The DOD was involved in the
creation of COVID through intelligence agency partnerships with
EcoHealth Alliance and the same people pushed the vaccine bioweapons
(more in our Report
on the Origins of SARS-COV-2). My question is, will the new House
actually investigate and push for the prosecution of the DOD
personnel involved in a plot that has killed over 10 million people
globally between the jabs, the disease, and the lockdowns? Or will
they continue to keep Jan 6ers as political prisoners and ramble on
about sedition by Trump when true sedition and treason seems to have
occurred in our very own DOD.
The nation was horrified
last Monday night to see Buffalo Bills
Safety Damar Hamlin collapse on the field after making a
tackle. Hamlin
was given CPR for ten minutes before being brought to
hospital via an ambulance driven onto the field. It is being reported
that Hamlin suffered a heart attack, but Dr. Peter McCullough
suspects that subclinical
vaccine-induced myocarditis may have been a contributing
factor.
Sadly, it took a Monday
Night Football national audience to
witness what has been happening for two years now. And it looks as
though scenes like this will be commonplace
for the foreseeable future.
Project
Veritas released a new video yesterday where one of their
undercover reporters recorded a conversation with Jordon Trishton
Walker, an alleged “Pfizer Director of Research and Development,
Strategic Operations – mRNA Scientific Planner.”
Everyone in the Alternative Media who has covered this, at least
the articles I have seen, have concentrated on Walker’s statements
regarding how Pfizer is experimenting with the idea of “Directed
Evolution,” which Project Veritas and others claim is the same
thing as “gain of function.”
I almost was not even going to cover this video, because for one
thing, I do not approve of Project Veritas’s use of lies and
deception to trap someone. Walker clearly asks the “reporter” to
promise him not to tell anyone this, and you can clearly see in the
video that the interviewer gives him a fist bump in an affirmative
reply.
Secondly, as hard as this interviewer tried to get Walker to admit
that Pfizer was already working on a method to make variants of the
COVID virus more virulent, Walker repeatedly stated that this was
just an idea that had been discussed, and that they had no idea
whether or not it would work.
Perhaps that is why Project Veritas felt the need to bring in one
of the new Superstar Pro-Vaccine doctors to give his opinion about
how bad this was.
In the end, I did decide to give this interview some exposure on
our network, not because of the claims that Pfizer could develop a
lab version of a new deadly COVID virus variant, but because Walker
admitted that Pfizer controls the U.S. Government health agencies
that approve their drugs, and that this is “bad” for the American
public, but good for business for the pharmaceutical companies.
We all already knew this was true, of course, but to get someone
within Pfizer to admit this was true, is really quite damaging, and
could potentially be used in a court of law if one could find an
honest judge somewhere that would have the courage to rule against
the criminal activities of Pfizer.
Here is a clip of the video with the main interview, minus the
talking head pro-vaccine doctor’s comments.
I interviewed virologist Dr. Byram Bridle,
Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Guelph University,
Ontario
He points out that there is no evidence of benefit. If
anything, all the evidence shows the vaccines INCREASE risk of
infection, hospitalization, death
According to Professor Bridle, at best, there are no benefits for
the COVID vaccines.
But the data shows they make the problem worse in every metric:
infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. You’ve been completely
misled by the medical community about these vaccines.
There isn’t a single “expert” in the world who is willing to
show Professor Bridle that he got it wrong.
Dear everyone, who is nervously looking around and is asking
“What the hell is going on?”
I hope this isn’t too controversial. It’s certainly
frightening, but I believe we are still on the right side of disaster
& if enough of us become aware of what is happening here &
everywhere in the democratic world, we can recover the situation. We
really don’t have long. I believe it’s likely things will change
irretrievably over this coming winter. Hence this urgent and unusual
request.
Everything that’s happened and is happening becomes much
simpler and it all makes sense, only when you force yourself to think
the impossible.
If you experimentally adopt the position that OUR
GOVERNMENT IS ACTIVELY WORKING TO HARM US, TO DISMANTLE MODERN
SOCIETY & ENSLAVE ALL PEOPLE IN A DIGITALLY CONTROLLED
TOTALITARIAN WORLD, it all fits. Nothing is surplus.
Even if your immediate response is that this is absurd,
please try it for a day or so.
Former Coca-Cola consultant-turned-whistleblower Calley
Means has warned that Big Ag, Big Food, and Big Pharma are keeping
people poisoned, overweight, and unhealthy to
maximize and protect their profits from the sale of toxic
food and so-called anti-obesity medication.
Means made the warning during a recent appearance on
the podcast of English actor Russell Band, “Stay Free With Russel
Brand.”
“This is a scandal that I think is the biggest story in
the country right now,” said Means. “This is not complicated …
We are being poisoned from a rigged food system and the medical
system is profiting.”
Central to Big Food and Big Pharma’s plan is Ozempic, a
drug approved by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA).It
is a semaglutide injection allegedly designed to help improve insulin
sensitivity and weight loss.
The FDA has approved Ozempic for the treatment of Type 2
diabetes, to improve blood sugar levels along with a healthy diet and
regular exercise and reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events
like heart attack, stroke, or death in adults with Type 2 diabetes
and heart disease.
The FDA Commissioner Robert Califf and the CDC Director
Rochelle Walensky teamed up to issue a strong rebuke to Florida’s
Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo for issuing a health
alert that his state’s surveillance system reported a
major uptick in adverse events in concert with the rollout of the
Covid mRNA shots.
“In Florida alone, there was a 1,700% increase in VAERS
reports after the release of the COVID-19 vaccine, compared to an
increase of 400% in overall vaccine administration for the same time
period,” the alert added and
provided a graphic.
More than $250 billion in Covid-19 relief funds were
lost to “fraud” and “waste,” the
directors of three US government agencies testified before the House
Oversight and Accountability subcommittee on Thursday.
Compounding what Deputy Inspector General Sheldon
Shoemaker of the Small Business Administration (SBA) called “the
biggest fraud in a generation,” the officials
stressed that the figures they gave represented an extremely
conservative estimate of the total amount lost as they did not
include the amount defrauded from the Pandemic Unemployment
Assistance program.
Hugh Auchincloss served as Anthony Fauci's right hand man
for almost two decades, and he is currently the top bureaucrat at the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). With
the Biden Administration showing seemingly no interest in appointing
a new NIAID chief, Auchincloss has inherited his post in
semi-permanent fashion. His role now includes being the chief
decision maker for directing billions of taxpayer dollars into the
coffers of research institutes and pharmaceutical companies. And with
all of the attention turned to the semi-retired Dr Fauci, Auchincloss
has been able to operate as the NIAID’s new head honcho without
even a hint of a vetting process.
It all started back in the 1950s with “these drugs
will make you feel better, just try them.” And people did.
Over the years it morphed into “WE RECOMMEND these
drugs if you don’t want to be sick, depressed or dead.” Almost
everyone listened and accepted that drugs were the answer and there
was no way to live without them.
Over the past three years it’s been “YOU MUST
TAKE these drugs or else you endanger your own life and the
lives of those around you.” By this point, people were so
conditioned to take drugs that they thought nothing of submitting to
an experimental mRNA gene therapy that the experts promised would
keep them “safe”.
Within the next couple of years, it will be “YOU ARE
REQUIRED to take these drugs by law and if you don’t, you will
go to prison for endangering the planet.” Having been consistently
brainwashed for all these years, most people will unquestioningly
comply. Those who don’t, will be informed on by neighbors,
coworkers, even their own family members, for the safety of the
planet.
America's COVID Response
Was Based on Lies | Opinion
Scott W. Atlas
Senior Fellow, Hoover
Institution
On 3/6/23 at 6:00 AM EST
Almost all of America's leaders have gradually pulled back their
COVID mandates, requirements, and closures—even in states like
California, which had imposed the most stringent and longest-lasting
restrictions on the public. At the same time, the media has been
gradually acknowledging the ongoing release of studies that totally
refute the purported reasons behind those restrictions. This overt
reversal is falsely portrayed as "learned" or "new
evidence." Little acknowledgement of error is to be found. We
have seen no public apology for promulgating false information, or
for the vilification and delegitimization of policy experts and
medical scientists like myself who spoke out correctly about data,
standard knowledge
about viral infections and pandemics, and fundamental biology.
The historical record is critical. We have seen a macabre
Orwellian attempt to rewrite history and to blame the failure of
widespread lockdowns on the lockdowns' critics, alongside absurd
denials of officials' own incessant demands for them. In the Trump
administration, Dr. Deborah
Birx was formally in charge of the medical side of the White
House's coronavirus task force during the pandemic's first year. In
that capacity, she authored all written federal policy
recommendations to governors and states and personally advised each
state's public health officials during official visits, often with
Vice President Mike
Pence, who oversaw the entire task force. Upon the inauguration
of President Joe
Biden, Dr. Anthony
Fauci became chief medical advisor and ran the Biden pandemic
response.
We must acknowledge the abject failure of the Birx-Fauci policies.
They were enacted, but they failed to stop the dying, failed to stop
the infection from spreading, and inflicted massive damage and
destruction particularly on lower-income families and on America's
children.
More than 1 million American deaths
have been attributed to that virus. Even after draconian measures,
including school closures, stoppage of non-COVID medical care,
business shutdowns, personal restrictions, and then the continuation
of many restrictions and mandates in the presence of a vaccine, there
was an undeniable failure—over two presidential administrations—to
stop cases from rapidly escalating.
Numerous
experts—including John
Ioannidis, David
Katz, and myself—called
for targeted protection, a safer alternative to widespread lockdowns,
in national media beginning in March of 2020. That proposal was
rejected. History's biggest public health policy failure came at the
hands of those who recommended the lockdowns and those who
implemented them, not those who advised otherwise.
The
tragicfailure
of reckless, unprecedented lockdowns that were contrary to
established pandemic science, and the added massive harms of those
policies on children, the elderly, and lower-income families, are
indisputable and well-documented
in numerousstudies.
This was the biggest, the most tragic, and the most unethical
breakdown of public health leadership in modern history.
In a democracy, indeed in any ethical and free society, the truth
is essential. The American people need to hear the truth—the facts,
free from the political distortions, misrepresentations, and
censorship. The first step is to clearly state the harsh truth in the
starkest possible terms. Lies were told. Those lies harmed the
public. Those lies were directly contrary to the evidence, to decades
of knowledge on viral pandemics, and to long-established fundamental
biology.
Here
are the 10 biggest falsehoods—known for years to be false, not
recently learned or proven to be so—promoted by America's public
health leaders, elected and unelected officials, and now-discredited
academics:
1. SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has a far higher fatality rate than the
flu by several orders of magnitude.
2. Everyone is at significant risk to die from this virus.
3. No one has any immunological protection, because this virus is
completely new.
4. Asymptomatic people are major drivers of the spread.
5. Locking down—closing schools and businesses, confining people
to their homes, stopping non-COVID medical care, and eliminating
travel—will stop or eliminate the virus.
6. Masks will protect everyone and stop the spread.
7. The virus is known to be naturally occurring, and claiming it
originated in a lab is a conspiracy theory.
8. Teachers are at especially high risk.
9. COVID vaccines stop the spread of the infection.
10. Immune protection only comes from a vaccine.
None of us are so naïve as to expect a direct apology from
critics at my employer, Stanford
University, or in government, academic public health, and the
media. But to ensure that this never happens again, government
leaders, power-driven officials, and influential academics and
advisors often harboring conflicts of interest must be held
accountable. Personally, I remain highly skeptical that any
government investigation or commission can avoid politicization.
Regardless of their intention, all such government-run inquiries will
at least be perceived as politically motivated and their conclusions
will be rejected outright by many. Those investigations must proceed,
though, if only to seek the truth, to teach our children that truth
matters, and to remember G.K. Chesterton's critical lesson that
"Right is right, even if nobody does it. Wrong is wrong, even if
everybody is wrong about it."
Scott W. Atlas, MD is the Robert Wesson Senior Fellow in
health policy at Stanford University's Hoover Institution,
Co-Director of the Global Liberty Institute, Founding Fellow of
Hillsdale's Academy for Science & Freedom, and author of A
Plague Upon Our House: My Fight at the Trump White House to Stop
COVID from Destroying America (Bombardier Press, 2022).
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
In a remarkable interview Thursday, Anthony Fauci had the
gall to defend dangerous gain of function research, which in all
likelihood was the direct cause of the COVID pandemic, and mocked the
idea that a lab leak is being covered up.
Appearing on Fox News, Fauci told anchor Neil Cavuto “If you
shut off all gain of function research. Did you get the flu shot this
year, Neil? If you did, and you got it from an influenza vaccine,
that was gain-of-function that made that influenza vaccine. That’s
what people don’t understand.”
Fauci twice suggested that he should be “taken out of this,”
reasoning that “I’m a charged person,” and went on to argue the
case for gain of function research, which makes pathogens more
deadly.
“The whole scientific community feels that you have to
have some degree of being able to manipulate organisms,”
Fauci claimed, adding “When you do it, you have to do it
carefully and under very controlled conditions.”
All the while, Fauci was again careful not to define exactly what
gain of function is, having previously
changed the definition to cover his own culpability.
When asked if the research serves any value, Fauci stated “It
depends on what your definition of gain of function is,” going on
to say “Look at a whole array of virologists and scientists who do
research that is absolutely critical for the health of the country.
Some of that involves manipulating organisms. You want to call it
gain of function. It really is not, in many respects, but it needs to
be very well-regulated.”
“Safe and Effective”? Every parent who is fighting to
protect their children from Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines
should have cases like this saved in their records and ready to give
to their lawyers, to health authorities, or to the Courts.
Below are 16 cases of serious adverse events in children following
Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, as recorded in the US
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system (VAERS).
Folks, this is a big deal. In Congressional testimony
(March 8-9) Dr Robert Redfield, who was director of the Centers for
Disease Control during the Covid pandemic, told Congress that Dr.
Fauci financed the gain-of-function research that made the virus so
contagious, that the virus was not natural and was engineered in a
lab, and that Fauci excluded him from meetings and decisions because
he, Redfield, was disturbed about what was going on.
There is no doubt of Fauci’s guilt, but with Democrats
controlling the White House and Senate, Fauci cannot be held
accountable. The mass murderer is free while Trump
supporters who attended a rally are in prison. This is what Democrat
rule means. Americans who vote Democrat vote for a Third
Reich regime.
My personal opinion is that the virus was released not
accidentally in China but intentionally by Washington. On top of 9/11
as an inside job we have the Covid pandemic as an inside job.
Read this and watch the short segments of testimony.
Excess
mortality in Germany 2020–2022 is a preprint by Christof
Kuhbandner (a psychologist at Regensburg) and Matthias Reitzner (a
statistician at Osnabrück) that applies sophisticated actuarial
analysis to the publicly available all-cause mortality data provided
by the German government. It turns out that when you account for
historical mortality trends, the virus no longer looks so dangerous,
and the vaccines no longer look so great.
From the abstract:
In 2020, the observed number of deaths was close to the
expected number with respect to the empirical standard deviation. By
contrast, in 2021, the observed number of deaths was two empirical
standard deviations above the expected number. The high excess
mortality in 2021 was almost entirely due to an increase in deaths in
the age groups between 15 and 79 and started to accumulate only from
April 2021 onwards. A similar mortality pattern was observed for
stillbirths with an increase of about 11 percent in the second
quarter of the year 2021.
Something must have happened in April 2021 that led to a
sudden and sustained increase in mortality in the age groups below 80
years, although no such effects on mortality had been observed during
the COVID-19 pandemic so far.
What happened in April 2021 was the beginning of mass
vaccination across Germany.
Here’s an overview of mortality deficit or excess by age
bracket...
Dr.
Anthony Fauci has hit back against those wishing to see him
prosecuted over his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The now retired Fauci, 82, called his accusers 'insane,'
during an interview with CNN's
Jim Acosta Saturday.
He said he and his family are still receiving death
threats due to his response to the 2020 pandemic - months after
stepping down from his role as director of the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Dr. Anthony
Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said there may be a natural explanation
for COVID-19 during an appearance on CNN Saturday.
The first
hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic
occurred this week, and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) spilled the beans
about the Chinese Community Party’s (CCP) deliberate destruction of
evidence pertaining to its alleged Wuhan lab origins.
Dr. Anthony Fauci
oversaw the funding of coronavirus gain-of-function research at the
Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, and bragged about working with
the Chinese scientists there. He has infamously argued that
conducting such experiments on contagious viruses and increasing
their potency was worth the risk, even if the research could
accidentally lead to a pandemic. So, with the help of his colleague
Peter Daszak at EcoHealth Alliance, Fauci helped subvert the ban on
gain-of-function research, offshoring it to China.
The Democrats are
livid that Elon Musk allowed journalists to come into Twitter after
he purchased the company and release damning information that the
government, corrupt politicians (like Adam Schiff), corrupt NGOs, Big
Media and Big Tech colluded to censor, shadow-ban, and purge
conservative content.
During a Wednesday appeal hearing over a lawsuit challenging a New
York Covid-19 vaccine
mandate for teachers, a lawyer for the plaintiffs disclosed
that teachers who refused the jab had their fingerprints sent to
the FBI.
“When the city puts these ‘problem codes’ on employees who
have been terminated because of their unconstitutional policies, not
only do they have this flag in their files, but their fingerprints
are sent with that flag to the FBI and the New York Criminal Justice
Services,” said attorney John Bursch, who is representing 21
teachers and other Department of Education employees challenging New
York City‘s vaccine mandate.
“So it impacts their ongoing ability to get employment at other
places,” Bursch
told the appeals panel.
Reacting to this news, plaintiff Michael Kane noted that
New York City sending unvaccinated teachers’ fingerprints to the
FBI undermines the city’s justification for firing them. New York
City has argued that it did not fire the teachers for “misconduct,”
but instead for not meeting a requirement for employment.
Judicial Watch announced today it received 57
pages of heavily redacted records from the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS) that show, just two days prior to
FDA approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, a discussion
between U.S. and UK health regulators regarding the COVID shot and
“anaphylaxis,” with the regulators emphasizing their “mutual
confidentiality agreement.”
Judicial Watch obtained the records through a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against
HHS (Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No.
1:22-cv-00660)) after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which
is an agency of HHS, failed to respond to an August 30, 2021, FOIA
request for:
All emails sent to and from members of the Vaccines and Related
Biological Products Advisory Committee regarding adverse events,
deaths and/or injuries caused by investigatory vaccines for the
prevention or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19 currently
produced by Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and/or Johnson & Johnson.
Accountability for the mRNA “vaccine” Murders Has Begun
The US Presstitutes Will Suppress these Reports from Switzerland
and Thailand
The Swiss President and the Minister of Health are under
investigation, indictment, and prosecution by the Swiss Attorney
General for Covid Crimes involving lying about the vaccine
effectiveness and safety.
Thailand is convening war crime tribunals to nullify Pfizer
Contracts.
Listen to the 19 minute video where you will learn that the
mRNA deadly envelop is now the basis of flu shots and vaccination of
all animals.
New York Mayor Eric Adams appeared on the Friday broadcast of
Caribbean Power Jam Radio’s “The Reset Show.” During that show
appearance, Mayor Adams not only defended the city’s Covid jab
mandate, but then went on to declare that it “just wasn’t right”
for people to “do whatever [they] want.” He then went on to hint
that, in the future, such mandates could return.
Speaking on that, Mayor Adams began by congratulating Mayor Bill
DeBlasio for his work in pushing the jab mandates, saying “I
know what COVID looked like, and I know that if we didn’t have
those mandates — I take my hat off to Bill de Blasio.”
Continuing, Mayor Adams then went on to cheer the anti-freedom
“cultural shift” that occurred during the pandemic. Specifically,
he said it was a good thing that people weren’t able to stop the
government from mandating them to wear a mask, saying:
“That was a tough call, because you know New Yorkers…no
New Yorker wants anyone telling them anything. … That’s just who
we are. We don’t want to be mandated. We don’t want anyone to
tell us to put on a mask. That’s just who we are. So, that was a
cultural shift in our mindset to say, we’re fighting this dangerous
virus.”
On Friday’s broadcast of Caribbean Power Jam Radio’s “The
Reset Show,” New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) defended the city’s
coronavirus vaccine mandate for city workers that is being rescinded
because “we’re seeing a normalization of COVID,” and stated
that the fact that employees said, “I want to do whatever I want.
That just wasn’t right.” Adams also said that “there may be
another time that we’re going to have to do mandates again because
these viruses are not going away.”
Adams stated, [relevant remarks begin around 51:20] “I know what
COVID looked like, and I know that if we didn’t have those mandates
— I take my hat off to Bill de Blasio. That was a tough call,
because you know New Yorkers…no New Yorker wants anyone telling
them anything. … That’s just who we are. We don’t want to be
mandated. We don’t want anyone to tell us to put on a mask. That’s
just who we are. So, that was a cultural shift in our mindset to say,
we’re fighting this dangerous virus. I was at the hospitals, seeing
trailers of bodies. I saw the nurses and doctors and hospital
employees wearing plastic bags and makeshift face masks, putting
themselves in harm’s way. I saw the first responders. I was on the
ground. Remember, I moved into Borough Hall and dealt with that
virus, responding every day on the ground. This was real. If we
didn’t have that vaccine and we didn’t have those mandates, we
would have lost so many more lives.”
An anti-vaxxer nurse who injected up to 8,600 elderly people with
saline solution instead of a Covid-19 vaccine
has walked free from court.
Red Cross nurse Antje T, 39, jabbed thousands of elderly patients
at a vaccine centre in Germany with
what she told them was the BioNTech Pfizer vaccine
but was just a saltwater solution.
The nurse, who administered the fake vaccines at the Schortens jab
centre in Friesland, northwest Germany, was given just six
months on probation.
There has been a flood of anecdotal reports on social media of
thyroid dysfunction and new thyroid diseases following COVID-19 mRNA
vaccination, for both Pfizer and Moderna.
A new Japanese
study by Morita et al., of 70 healthcare workers showed increased
thyroid auto-antibodies following 2 Pfizer jabs as well as booster
shot (click
here).
CBS joins the chorus of mainstream media outlets promoting the
false narrative that covid is the cause of a sharp increase in excess
heart failure deaths around the world. The concept of "covid
heart" has been thoroughly
debunked by multiple studies, yet the lie continues to
persist because of media disinformation.
An
early report that set in motion fears of a Covid-heart
disease connection was published in JAMA Cardiology on July 27,
2020. German
researchers claimed that 78% of recently recovered Covid-19
patients had “abnormal” signs on their cardiac magnetic resonance
scans and 60% showed signs of inflamed heart muscle, a condition
known as myocarditis.
Those astonishing numbers were covered in nearly
400 news outlets. The report has so far received been viewed more
than 900,000 times — a rarity for academic papers.
Soon after its publication, however, the paper was
criticized for statistical and methodologic errors. It
eventually underwent a long but much quieter correction that
indicated that many of the abnormalities were only marginally more
common among those recovering from Covid-19 than among similar
control individuals who had not had Covid-19.
The assertion of the existence of covid heart serves a useful
purpose, however, as it conveniently helps to distract from the very
real threat of myocarditis caused by mRNA vaccines. Studies
show a direct connection between covid vaccination,
boosters, and risk of heart failure, specifically in younger people.
The corporate media continues to ignore these studies in favor of the
covid heart claim.
The top ranks of the European Parliament have slammed the door
shut to apublic cross-examination of
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen over her personal role in
negotiating a multibillion euro vaccine deal with Pfizer.
Last
month, lawmakers in the Parliament's special committee on
COVID-19 proposed to invite von der Leyen to answer questions on the
EU's largest vaccine contract, signed at the height of the pandemic.
It was in the run-up to this contract that she is reported to have
exchanged text
messages with Pfizer's Chief Executive Albert Bourla.
However, at a closed-door meeting Thursday of the Conference of
Presidents (CoP) — which includes the heads of all the political
groups and the Parliament's president — leaders refused the request
to hold a public
grilling. Instead they decided to ask von der Leyen to answer
questions in private at some point in the future, watering down the
invitation to almost nothing.
Why does Eric Clapton’s story matter? He may have been
injured by two doses of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, but this is
not just an “AstraZeneca issue”.
This is a spike protein issue –
regardless of the platform that delivers the spike protein into your
body (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca, Novavax, Sputnik,
Covishield).
“In October that same year (2021) I received my first
vaccination (Moderna). Within days I started to feel severe
and unbearable shooting pain and paralysis in my hands and feet”
“Over time my condition worsened; I asked the doctors at the
hospital if I would ever walk ‘properly’ again, and they would
not give me an answer”
“Shortly after the second shot my injuries were further
exacerbated and I was unable to move, my hands felt like
they were on fire…I was rushed to hospital once again, and
I thought my life was over”
“I continue to suffer severe ongoing pain due to
Neuropathy and neurological nerve damage due to the Moderna Spike
Vax….neuropathy was not listed on any of my consent forms”
“In Australia doctors are investigated and disciplined if they
confirm in writing that a COVID vaccine has caused a patient
injury. I had 5 different doctors confirm that my
condition was caused by the vaccine, and they all said they cannot go
on record.”
Breaking:
Today Florida Surgeon General issued an official “Health Alert on
mRNA COVID Vaccine Safety”:
“In
Florida alone there was a 1,700% increase in VAERS reports after the
release of the COVID vaccine. The reporting of life-threatening
conditions increased over 4,400%.” pic.twitter.com/gowRhmYHWb
Alberta’s COVID-19 double vaccinated population developed
severely damaged immune systems after their jabs, and by January 2022
Omicron (BA.1) wave #5, they were the sickest group of Albertans,
leading the province in infection rates, hospitalizations and deaths
(see part
1).
Instead of halting the COVID-19 vaccine rollout as science and
medical ethics required, Jason Kenney’s Alberta government deleted
this data from their website and pressed on with booster shots, which
failed after only 2 months, requiring even more data to be censored,
and deleted by our government (see Part
2).
On March 19, 2022, Alberta entered into
COVID-19 (BA.2) wave #6, led by the triple vaccinated
who made up 33% of the “currently hospitalized”, 48% of “new
cases” and 50% of “active cases”
As Joe Biden continues provoking a war with Russia more evidence
is piling up that the entire conflict may be designed to protect U.S.
military labs conducting illegal biological experiments. OAN’s
Pearson Sharp reports
Never before have there been
massive excess deaths following
vaccination.
Never before have there been
children, young adults, athletes in
their prime, entertainers, dropping dead “cause unknown”
following vaccination.
Of course, the cause is
known. The leading doctors and medical
scientists of our time–which excludes health agency bureaucrats,
such as Fauci, who serve as marketing agents for Big Pharma and
corrupt, politicized state medical boards and HMOs–have explained
why and how the mRNA “vaccines,” which are not vaccines, kill,
destroy the immune system, and cause health injuries. What is not
known is why some die immediately after receiving the deadly
substance, others a month later, and others remain, so far, alive.
Some researchers think the content of the “vaccines” differed by
lot, and some think some of the jabs were placebos for the purpose of
producing an uninjured cadre to tout the safety of the jabs.
The
Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced Friday that it has
launched an “additional investigation” into Pfizer’s updated
COVID booster after a government safety monitoring system detected a
potential stroke risk for those 65 and older who received the
pharmaceutical giant’s bivalent shot.
The
Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) no longer requires drugs to be tested on animals
before moving to human trials, according to a provision in the
omnibus spending bill recently signed by President Joe Biden.
Throughout the disastrous
COVID-19 injection campaign, desperate
patients have often asked me which is the safest vaccine? It is odd
that two years into mass vaccination there is no declared “best in
class” vaccine. Entities that mandate the vaccine don’t care
which vaccine is administered, only that a student, athlete,
employee, or soldier has been marked by one of them any time in the
past—often without any regard to its six month efficacy window.
Many thought initially that the Johnson and Johnson (Janssen) product
would be safer since it was just one shot of an adenoviral vector
vaccine (not mRNA). Unfortunately before COVID-19 it was known that
the vector itself was thrombogenic. So combined with the genetic code
for the Spike protein which is known to damage blood vessels and
cause blood clots, the Janssen vaccine was expected to cause
thromboembolism in patients from the very date of its release. Woo et
al from the FDA in a report has described thousands (N=3790, 11%
fatal) of patients with blood clots and their description of what
happens in the human body is nothing short of “blood curdling.”
Clots going from the ankle to the groin, shooting to both lungs, and
killing the victim is a description out of a science fiction horror
movie yet in this report produced by our own government gives no
apologies nor raises a sense of alarm for the public.
In a letter
sent this week to Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, Sen. Sanders
asked the drugmaker not to go ahead with the from $26 to $130 price
increases on its Covid vaccine, saying it could make the shot
unaffordable for millions of Americans.
He added that raising the
price of the shot was particularly
offensive given that the US government provided more than
$2billion in taxpayer money to fund the development of the vaccine.
U.S. drug regulators
acknowledged deviating from the
normal vaccine approval process when dealing with Pfizer’s COVID-19
shot, according to newly disclosed documents.
Weeks
after Pfizer and its partner BioNTech announced they started a
rolling submission of documents for approval of their
COVID-19 vaccine, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration official penned
a memorandum authorizing the release of a Biologics License
Application (BLA) number for the shot even as regulators weighed
whether to approve the BLA, one
of the documents shows.
“This deviation from our
normal practice is done to
facilitate product labeling and distribution and is consistent with
other Center practices to facilitate vaccine delivery during the
declared Public Health Emergency,” Christopher Joneckis,
the FDA’s
associate director for review management, wrote in the June 17, 2021,
memo. “When providing the license number, we should communicate
that this license number does not constitute any determination by FDA
on the application.”
Joneckis said the decision
stemmed in part from the FDA having
granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the shot in late 2020.
That means the FDA “is familiar with and has reviewed much of the
information provided in the BLA application,” which primarily
consisted of data used in the application for emergency clearance, he
said.
A U.S. senator is
questioning a top agency's public statements over safety signals for
the COVID-19 vaccines.
Dr. Rochelle
Walensky, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), claimed in 2022 that safety monitoring revealed no
“unexpected safety signals” for the vaccines.
The Epoch Times obtained
the results through a Freedom of Information Act after the CDC
refused to release them.
Sen. Ron Johnson
(R-Wis.) is now wondering why the CDC expected so many signals after
vaccination.
In a
Jan. 10 letter citing The Epoch Times article on the
results, Johnson demanded the CDC explain how it determined what is
and is not an “unexpected safety signal.”
“The
American people have a right to know the extent to which your agency
was aware of and tracked COVID-19 vaccine adverse events. Your
lack of transparency is unacceptable. Without immediately providing
complete and reliable information about COVID-19 vaccine adverse
events, you are obstructing Congressional oversight and leaving the
public in the dark,” added Johnson, who was stonewalled when he
requested the monitoring results.
A
lawsuit filed by two Disney employees who were fired for refusing the
COVID vaccine alleged that Disney is closely enmeshed with the
government and that when it forced a vaccine mandate on its
employees, it was essentially a “state actor” — which would
make it subject to the Constitution’s “equal protection clause,”
lawyers wrote.
Something strange is
going on with the VAERS system.
Reports that were present three months ago are now inexplicably
missing. And fewer than 4% of adverse events recorded in V-Safe have
made their way to VAERS.
This is the CDC’s database; Dr. Rochelle
Walensky is in charge of it. And the agency’s
failure to properly manage VAERS is
suppressing the already-alarming safety signal of the Covid-19 shots.
Now, what is VAERS?
VAERS stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
As mentioned earlier, VAERS is a database put in place in 1990 under
the supervision of the CDC. Reports of suspected vaccine adverse
events take about half an hour to fill out, and 86% of
the time, this is done by a doctor, nurse, paramedic, coroner, or
healthcare professional when he or she believes the adverse event is
related to a vaccine reaction. And because of its lengthy report
process as well as the lack of awareness of the existence of VAERS,
there is a general consensus of a severe underreporting
factor for this database.
To get a better idea
of what’s going on with the CDC’s
handling of the VAERS system, Dr. Naomi Wolf spoke with Dr. Henry
Ealy, an expert on the database.
Dr. Henry Ealy is the
Founder & Executive Community Director for the Energetic
Health Institute. He holds a Doctorate in naturopathic medicine
and has been at the tip of the spear on the Grand Jury front —
taking action to bring forth a Grand
Jury investigation of the CDC for allegations of criminal
data fraud and willful misconduct.
“You mentioned that V-Safe
should be added to VAERS, but only 4%
of V-Safe [adverse events have been] added. Can you explain what that
means to people and why it matters?” asked Dr.
Wolf.
Facebook
requested
talking points from the Biden administration to “get ahead” of
the possibility that people might be less likely to get a COVID-19
vaccine after evidence emerged that the Johnson and Johnson (J&J)
single-dose vaccine might cause life-threatening blood clots in some
rare cases, documents shared with the Daily Caller News Foundation
show.
Recently, a paper was
published in the journal Science
Immunologyshowing
that people who get “vaccinated” for covid with mRNA
suffer immune dysregulation resulting in overproduction of an
antibody called IgG4.
This dysregulation means
that over time the “fully vaccinated”
will lose their generalized immunity and no longer be able to ward
off coronaviruses of any kind, including the common cold. (Related:
Mass “vaccination” for covid has led
to a massive spike in AIDS.)
With each subsequent
infection, someone who got all his covid
shots will become increasingly more prone to illness. Conversely,
those with natural immunity will become less prone
to infection because their immune systems function properly and
continually learn how to fight mutating disease.
During a COVID-19 EU hearing last
October, Pfizer’s President of International Developed Markets,
Janine Small, admitted that the vaccine had never been tested on its
ability to prevent transmission, contrary to what was previously
advertised.
During the hearing, when
asked by Dutch politician Ross if the
Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus
before it entered the market, Janine Small responded while smiling,
“Regarding the
question around did we know about stopping immunization before it
entered the market? No. We have to really move at the speed of
science to really understand what is taking place in the market.”
“The Participating Member
State acknowledges that the Vaccine
and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and
constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the
emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to
be studied after provision of the Vaccine to the Participating Member
States under the APA,” according to the documents.
“The Participating
Member State further acknowledges that the long-term effects and
efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be
adverse effects from the Vaccine that are not currently known.”
I have said on national
TV throughout the COVID-19 vaccine
campaign that no young person should receive a shot because the risks
far outweigh the benefits. Chiu et al published a report where both
cardiac symptoms and ECG changes were recorded after the first and
second injections. The results are alarming. After the second
injection of mRNA 17.1% of students reported cardiovascular symptoms.
A walk through the news
Sunday morning brought us even more
shocking stories of young and healthy Americans 'dying suddenly
and without warning' with the sudden and unexpected deaths
of a 16-year-old-girl
who collapsed and died while playing flag football as well
as the
death of an 18-year-old girl in 'excellent
physical condition'
who was a mixed martial artist from Hawaii and who died
unexpectedly just weeks before an MMA match. And those are just the
ones we're hearing about! In the only video at the bottom of this
story we see a must-watch video that Steve
Quayle linked to on his website Sunday morning
titled "GENOCIDE SUDDEN DEATH COMPILATION" which
features a compilation of video clips showing global
genocide, psychopaths, vaccine injuries, forced injections, spiral of
death, sudden adult death syndrome and more.)
A popular argument against
the various vaccine mandates imposed
upon citizens the world over is that they violate the Nuremberg
Code of 1947. Many an article points out that the Code states
that, as regards any experimental medical treatment, "the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential …
without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit,
duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or
coercion.”
The common retort is to
insist that the COVID-19 'vaccines'
are not “experimental.” This appeal seems a
little desperate—a grasping at straws.
A group of University of
Florida medical-school faculty
members challenged controversial guidance by state Surgeon
General Joseph Ladapo on COVID-19 vaccinations, but
a university official said Wednesday the guidance is outside the
scope of Ladapo’s work with the school.
Ladapo, who holds a faculty
position in the UF College of
Medicine, was tapped in September 2021 by Gov. Ron
DeSantis to serve as surgeon general and secretary of
the Florida Department of Health. Ladapo has become a controversial
national figure because of his positions on issues such as COVID-19
vaccines and mask requirements.
In
October, Ladapo issued
guidance advising males ages 18 through 39 to avoid getting shots
with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The Department of Health
published an analysis that showed an increase “in the relative
incidence of cardiac-related death” among males in that age group
roughly a month after receiving the shots.
The report by the UF College
of Medicine’s Faculty Council
Committee, first reported by The Washington Post, was shared with
medical-school faculty Tuesday. It outlined seven “major critiques”
of Ladapo’s vaccine guidance.
According
to
billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates, animals that humans eat have
inadequate genetics. And the only way to “fix” those genetics is
to “vaccinate” said animals with new mRNA (messenger RNA)
“vaccines.”
About half of Americans
believe that the COVID-19 vaccines have
caused side effects that have contributed to a significant number of
unexplained deaths, according to a new survey.
The survey by
Rasmussen Reports, which was conducted from Dec. 28 to 30, found 49
percent of American Adults believe it’s likely that side effects of
COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained
deaths, including 28 percent who considered it “very likely.”
Ever since covid “vaccines”
were unleashed under Operation
Warp Speed, excess deaths have soared across the developed world.
Most notably in recent days, Japan, which fared relatively well
throughout the scamdemic pre-jab, has seen soaring
rates of excess death – especially after the latest covid
“boosters” were released by Pfizer.
Japan’s third-dose “booster
shot” program commenced on Dec.
1, 2021, resulting in 83 percent of the country being “fully
vaccinated” by the end of 2022. With that came the highest number
of excess deaths Japan has seen in 11 years.
“Excess deaths were
approximately four times the number of those
in the years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021,” reported The
Exposé.
But wait: where is
2020 in that mix? We are glad you
asked because it turns out that 2020, before the
so-called “vaccines” were unleashed, saw the least number
of excess deaths compared to all nine years prior.
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) has come out
with a guide for how we are all to speak and write. This can be found
on the website titled, “Preferred
Terms for Select Population Groups & Communities.” It is
clear that this list is being read and distributed broadly – from
medical institutions, hospitals, scientific communications, doctor’s
offices, schools and universities, as well as other US Government
agencies and institutes.
The CDC is the arm of the US
Government tasked with disease
control and prevention. It is not tasked with correcting wrong-speak.
Now, how exactly this guide
fits in with the CDC mission is beyond
me. Here is what the CDC lists as their mission on their website:
Former White House adviser
Dr. Scott Atlas, the Robert Wesson
Senior Fellow in health policy at Stanford University's Hoover
Institute, wrote an
excellent essay recently in the Wall Street Journal.
In it, he raisesa
vital question for all students, parents, faculty, and the broader
public, as to how our nation's university system became, along with
major media, the most aggressive proponent and distributor of medical
ideology and biosecurity policy. University
behavior continues to be directed by the CDC and WHO, and it appears
that university administration will continue its commitment to a
consensus posture toward the COVID phenomenon, until another
institution that it considers authoritative tells it
otherwise. That
is not likely to happen.
Academia will never
account for its misguided COVID policies, and it will never back
out of its commitment to consensus explanations or
opportunities. Indeed, these people will
help accelerate the entire COVID complex. COVID is a new
social engineering program, and universities will make biosecurity,
including molecular engineering and tracking technology, into a
permanent research activity that is worth billions per year in
funding and commercialization. The link connecting
business, government, and higher education has never been stronger,
while China-style social credit scoring, based in part on medical and
ideological compliance, is considered by the current White House
administration a necessary part of the political agenda.
After all of the criticism
I’ve directed toward Coronamaniacs
and the Vaxxmongers over the past three years - in-person and online
- I know that many of them have wished that I’d get very sick and
die “from Covid.” If I had, they would have gleefully jeered me,
as many did when lockdown critic Herman Cain died. Bear in mind that
Mr. Cain was 74 and had Stage IV cancer.
But I haven’t died “from
Covid.” Like the super-vast
majority of people, I was never at any risk of doing so.
While I’d prefer to
never get sick, I always knew it was possible that I might “get
Covid,” just as I had gotten some other, prior, unnamed
coronavirus-driven colds or flus. It’s how life is, has been and
will always be. Many people
seem to be sick lately. It doesn’t help immune function to be in
the low light/low Vitamin D state of winter. And during the past
three years of disrupted social life, our immune systems haven’t
been properly tested.
Many have said that, by
Spring, 2022, everyone had been exposed to
Covid-causing coronaviruses. Maybe it’s true, though it sounds like
hyperbole; I’m not sure how this could be known. Regardless, except
for one February, 2020 day of malaise, and then a week-long dry cough
with no apparent cause—perhaps a quick, nearly asymptomatic,
pre-Lockdown brush with Covid, or perhaps nothing at all—I’ve
felt fine for the past three years.
Last week, on the
day after Christmas, that changed.
My muscles started to ache.
These aches spread and lasted for
three days, accompanied by a tight chest and a banging headache. On
Day 2, I also got a high fever. I let the fever crest until I took
some Tylenol to moderate my temperature. Serial doses over the next
two days quelled the headaches. My wife got sick the day after I did
and exhibited the same symptoms.
By our respective
Day 4s, we each felt much better.
Aside from the fever, we
didn’t have the publicized, original
Covid symptoms: shortness of breath, dry cough and fatigue. Plus, for
what it’s worth, we each tested negative on home antigen tests that
my wife had gotten in the mail. Thus, we mutually guessed that we
probably had some form of flu. I didn’t care whether or not I had
“had Covid.” That diagnosis never scared me. I only cared that we
felt sick for three days.
The researchers in this
study looked at blood samples from 16
myocarditis patients, confirmed to have high levels of serum cardiac
troponin T. All developed myocarditis after receiving the COVID-19
vaccine, typically within a week of the second dose. However, a few
became sick after the first dose or booster dose. Over 80% were male.
They were studied by
antibody profiling, including antibodies to
the virus, autoantibodies or antibodies to the virome, and the
analysis of T cells specifically directed against the virus. In
addition, cytokine and antigen profiles were determined. These
measurements were compared with those of 45 vaccinated controls, who
were of similar age and health.
The following video
interview with Prof. Michel
Chossudovsky pertains to the Confidential Pfizer
Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure.
The report is a
bombshell. The vaccine was launched in
mid-December 2020. By the end of February 2021, “Pfizer
had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly
caused by the vaccine and tens of
thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases
of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000
reports of cardiac disorders.”
This Confidential
Pfizer Report provides
data on deaths and adverse events recorded by Pfizer from the outset
of the vaccine project in December 2020 to the end
of February
2021, namely a very short period (at most two and a
half months).
The data from
mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 unequivocally confirms
“Manslaughter”. Based on the evidence, Pfizer had the
responsibility to immediately cancel and withdraw the “vaccine”.
Pfizer’s Worldwide
marketing of the Covid-19 Vaccine beyond February 28th, 2021, is no
longer an “Act of Manslaughter”.
Murder as opposed to
Manslaughter implies “Criminal Intent”.
Pfizer’s
Covid 19 Vaccine constitutes a Criminal Act. From a legal
standpoint it is an “Act of Murder” applied Worldwide to a
target population of 8 billion people.
Remember Event
201 of 18
October 2019 in NYC, hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health
Security, in partnership with the WEF (World Economic Forum) and the
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation? Of course, WHO was also present,
and so were all the Globalist players, including the World Bank, IMF
and – of indeed the UN and many of its sub-organization. See this.
This was a “tabletop”
simulation, as they call it – of a
corona pandemic that may hit the entire world population “one of
these days”…
It happened less than three
months later. The rest is history.
Now, the same suspects,
replacing officially the WEF by WHO as a
key sponsor, used the Event of the Grand Challenges
Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022 for
a similar “tabletop” exercise, this time called “Catastrophic
Contagion” – see this.
Is it a coincidence that the
venue of this Event is Brussels,
Headquarters of the EU and NATO?
Strange that this surfaced
only now. And be assured, the WEF was
omni-present.
In fact, without the WEF
nothing of this kind would happen.
Because the WEF is the Executing Branch of Big Finance – the
corporate finance-digito-military complex, that directs the world
from the shadows of Washington.
It is strange that hardly
anything surfaced from this event for
almost two months. Why was it kept secret until now?
Well, instead of, or in
addition to the vassalic UN organizations
and Washington controlled financial institutions, like World Bank and
IMF – they invited an extraordinary group of participants,
consisting of 10 current and former Health Ministers and senior
public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola,
Liberia, Singapore, India, Germany. Of particular interest are
African countries.
Excess mortality is
reported from Norway – and all over the
western world or Global North. Excesses never heard before. In the
ranges of between 15% and 25%. In some countries even higher.
Worrisome. No clear causes can be detected.
Already more than a year
ago Dr. Michael Yeadon,
former VP Pfizer and Chief of Science at Pfizer, warned that excess
deaths will appear in the next 3-5 and even up to ten years,
because of the false and criminal, untested mRNA vaxxes.
He elaborates. After all the
boosters – 3 to 4 shots – the
immune system has lost up to 80% of its defenses. Thus, people are
more vulnerable to catching any kind of disease. Plus, myocarditis
and sudden deaths are on the rise – even in young people,
especially those who practice sport or are sports professionals.
In addition, graphene oxide
injection and other concoctions being
injected, cause all sorts of cancers, mostly in reproductive systems
of men and women, as well as several types of cancers of the blood,
of the eyes causing blindness… liver and kidney diseases… and
much more.
In addition, these
injections, called vaccines, also cause massive
infertility. In some countries life-childbirth was down by up to 40%
in 2022.
Dr. Yeadon warned that the
diseases will be very difficult to
trace back to the vaxxes, but that’s where the origin is.
A clear eugenics agenda,
mass depopulation, unprecedented.
On Monday, ICAN obtained
confirmation of disturbing information about Oxford-AstraZeneca’s
covid “vaccine” from the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products
(“MHRA”).
Informed Consent Action
Network (“ICAN”), through its attorneys, submitted a
Freedom of Information request to the MHRA in April 2022 seeking
information relating to its authorisation of the AstraZeneca, as well
as Janssen, Moderna, and Pfizer covid “vaccines.” After
MHRA initially denying the request and ICAN resubmitting a request
with a narrower scope, MHRA finally provided 166 pages of records
containing the studies MHRA relied on to authorise AstraZeneca’s
covid injection for use en mass.
One of these records was a
study on mice which investigated the
biodistribution of the AstraZeneca “vaccine.” It revealed that
the viral vector DNA did not remain localised in the injection site
but instead migrated to other organs. Disturbingly, the study
found vector DNA in the sciatic nerves, bone marrow, livers, lungs,
and spleens of the mice following vaccination.
Additionally, in its
Marketing Authorisation Application,
AstraZeneca stated that because vulnerable populations – such as
pregnant and lactating women and immunocompromised persons – were
excluded from the studies, the safety of the vaccine in these groups
was unknown.
There is evidence showing
that the most toxic part of SARS-CoV-2,
the spike protein, is acting like a prion, or a misfolded protein
that has the ability to transmit its misfolded shape onto normal
variants of the same protein. Proliferation of prions in the brain is
associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s,
Alzheimer’s, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), and amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis (ALS).
In this interview with The
New American, MIT scientist Dr.
Stephanie Seneff discusses the pre-print article titled “SARS-CoV-2
Spike Protein in the Pathogenesis of Prion-like Diseases” and
explains the deadly mechanisms by which mRNA-induced spike protein
wreaks havoc in the human body, and in the brain in particular.
Remarkably, some of the blood cells can continuously produce spike
protein for months after vaccination, possibly through reverse
transcription of the mRNA into DNA, which amplifies the damage.
The doctor touched on the
hypothesis of the late Nobel Prize
laureate Dr. Luc Montagnier on the inserts of Human Immunodeficiency
Virus (HIV) in SARS-CoV-2 genome and argued that the virus was most
likely engineered as a bioweapon. Still, while the spike proteins
from the natural Covid infection do pose the discussed risk, it is
nowhere near the damage potentially inflicted on one’s body by the
vaccine-related mRNA-induced spike proteins, observed Dr. Seneff.
The doctor urged the parents
not to vaccinate their children with
mRNA shots because of the wide spectrum of harm that they inflict.
China
- Joe Biden is selling out America so fast that it’s hard to keep
up with new developments.
Noting
that Jeffrey Epstein, the leader of an international child sex
trafficking ring, had “escaped justice” from the Justice
Department, Senator Ben Sasse has now drawn attention to the guards
on duty during Jeffrey Epstein’s “suicide” having reached a
plea deal of 100 hours of community service. They will get no jail
time under the deal with the feds.
Epstein
escaped justice (first under Trump’s Attorney General Bill Barr)
and, with this new development under Biden, we may never find out how
he died and whether the tapes he made of sexual encounters involving
the rich and famous are in the possession of the Russians and the
Chinese.
The
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine safety group is
investigating reports that a 'small number' of teens and young adults
who have been vaccinated against coronavirus have experienced heart
problems days after receiving their second jab.
The
condition, known as myocarditis, results in an inflammation of the
heart muscle which can occur following certain infections.
Very
little detail was provided by the safety group which stated there
were 'relatively few' cases which may even be completely unrelated to
vaccination.
America’s
Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) today filed a motion in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of Alabama requesting a temporary
restraining order against the emergency use authorization (EUA)
permitting using the COVID-19 vaccines in children under the age of
16, and that no further expansion of the EUAs to children under the
age of 16 be granted prior to the resolution of these issues at
trial.
The
case will challenge the EUAs for the injections on several counts,
based on the law and scientific evidence that the EUAs should never
have been granted, the EUAs should be revoked immediately, the
injections are dangerous biological agents that have the potential to
cause substantially greater harm than the COVID-19 disease itself,
and that numerous laws have been broken in the process of granting
these EUAs and foisting these injections on the American people.
AFLDS
Founder Dr. Simone Gold spoke about the reasons for filing the
motion:
A
German scientist has discovered why the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19)
“vaccines” made by AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson (J&J)
are causing some recipients to develop deadly blood clots.
According
to Prof. Andreas Greinacher, a blood expert from the University of
Greifswald, the two viral vector vaccines contain genetically
modified (GMO) cold viruses that, upon injection, trigger an
autoimmune response.
Stray
proteins, Greinacher says, along with a preservative used
specifically in the AstraZeneca jab known as
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), are directly responsible for
causing the blood clots, he says.
Greinacher
and his team identified more than 1,000 human-derived cell proteins
in the injections that they believe are getting into people’s
bloodstreams and clamping onto a blood component known as platelet
factor 4, or PF4, where they form complexes that activate the
production of antibodies.
By:
malterwitty
An experimental physicist and bio-materials
researcher examined various PCR test swabs under a microscope and
found that the fibres they contain are as dangerous for human beings
as inhaling asbestos.
Professor
Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test swabs and analysed their
ingredients. The results showed that they are made of tough materials
and contain a large number of nano-particles including silver,
aluminum, titanium, and glass fibres. All of which are not declared
on the PCR test package insert.
According
to the Professor if these fibres get stuck in the mucous membranes
they can cause severe wounds and inflammation. Mucous membranes that
are no longer intact can no longer fulfill their role of fending off
viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the airways. The germs
penetrate the respiratory tract without any immune filter.
The Rat-in-a-Trap Dr. Fauci
finally admitted in his latest flip-flop that the COVID-19 virus may
not have occurred naturally.
Fauci made the comments on far-left Politifact channel, an
organization that itself has been pushing fake news on the COVID crisis
for over a year.
Politifact hack:
Sen. Rand Paul, who you have tangled with in the past, suggested that
you and the NIH funded risky research that eventually down the line was
connected to COVID-19? I don’t want to dwell on this for too long but I
do want to give you that chance to react to his comments today.
Dr. Fauci:
That’s actually preposterous. To bring something up is really not
helpful. He was saying that we funded a kind of research in China that
could lead to dangerous research. That’s not the case. So what he was
saying was absolutely not true. It is really unfortunate that he
brought that up. It really does nothing but cloud the issue of what we
are trying to do. So it was just unfortunate that he said that.
Politifact hack:
That has been the subject for a lot of our fact-checking on the
coronavirus for the past year. There’s a lot of cloudiness around the
origins of COVID-19 still. So I wanted to ask are you still confident
that COVID developed naturally?
Dr. Fauci: No
actually, that’s the point that I said. And I think that the real
unfortunate aspect of what Senator Paul did was he was conflating
research in a collaborative way with Chinese scientists which was —
you’d almost have to say that if we did not do that then we’d be almost
irresponsible because SARS-COVI‑1 clearly originated in China… So we
really had to learn a whole lot about the viruses that were there,
about whether or not people were getting infected with bad viruses. So
in a very minor collaboration as part of a sub-contract as part of a
grant, we had a collaboration with some Chinese scientists. And what he
conflated that was that we were involved in creating the virus. Which
is the most ridiculous majestic leap I’ve ever heard of.
Ruud
Dobber, a Senior Executive at AstraZeneca explained to Reuters last
year why the company insists it must be exempted from liability:
“This
is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the
risk if in … four years the vaccine is showing side effects,”
Ruud Dobber, a member of Astra’s senior executive team, told
Reuters.
“In
the contracts we have in place, we are asking for indemnification.
For most countries it is acceptable to take that risk on their
shoulders because it is in their national interest,” he said,
adding that Astra and regulators were making safety and tolerability
a top priority.
AstraZeneca
can not know and can not guarantee that four years after taking the
injection you won’t start to manifest side effects, and for that
reason can not afford the risk of being financially and criminally
liable.
How
many Americans have died after taking the Covid vaccine?
How
many Americans have died after taking the COVID vaccines? Not
Americans who’ve been killed by the virus, that’s a huge number,
but how many Americans have died after getting the vaccines designed
to prevent the virus? Do you know the answer to that question? Do you
know anything about the downside? We know a lot about the upside of
the vaccine. We’ve been completely in favor of vulnerable people
taking vaccines.
Sen.
Rand Paul (R-Ky.) says that he won’t get vaccinated against
COVID-19, explaining that he already contracted the virus last year
and has “natural immunity.”
Paul,
who is an ophthalmologist, said that he hasn’t seen evidence
proving the vaccine is more effective than having survived the CCP
virus, so he won’t get the shot.
“Until
they show me evidence that people who have already had the infection
are dying in large numbers, or being hospitalized or getting very
sick, I just made my own personal decision that I’m not getting
vaccinated because I’ve already had the disease, and I have natural
immunity,” Paul, who appears to be the first senator to announce he
won’t get vaccinated, told WABC 770 AM on May 23, according to news
reports.
Paul
has made similar remarks in the past when interviewed about vaccines.
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who also recovered from COVID-19,
suggested he wouldn’t get the vaccine earlier this year.
A
newly released Slovakian report reveals that “covid tests” are
contaminated with nanotech hydrogels and lithium. Lithium is used in
the lipid compound coating nanobots which are inserted into the
hydrogels for ballistic delivery of biological agents.
The
lipid coating is used to trick and bypass your God-given immune
system with the nanobots that contain a deadly Gain-of-Funtion spike
protein. This lab enhanced spike protein is a weaponized pathogen
with a DNA payload that gets deposited directly into human cells.
Nanotech
hydrogels were created for ballistic delivery of vaccines but
frontline medical experts now agree these are self-replicating
Biological weapons. The experts have also called for the vaxxed to be
quarantined.
The
governor of Michigan apologized for not sticking to the Covid-19
social-distancing guidelines after she was seen dining out with
friends in a crowded bar. She claimed she forgot about the rules
because she was vaccinated.
Lockdown-championing
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer was called out for hypocrisy after
a photo of her huddling together with 12 other people at a table in a
bar in East Lansing, Michigan surfaced on social media. The image was
shared by Detroit journalist Chad Livengood, who said it was posted
on Facebook on Saturday but has since been deleted.
THE
FUCKING UNDERSTATEMENT OF THE MILLENNIA!
UNREAL.
You Won’t BELIEVE Who Joe Biden Praised in front of the ENTIRE
Country
The
Political Insider reports, On Tuesday, Joe Biden travelled to
Michigan, where he praised Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) as
“honorable” despite the fact that backlash is continuing to grow
over her use of a private jet on a secret trip to Florida.
According
to Secret Service documents obtained by Judicial Watch, Hunter Biden
traveled extensively during the first five and a half years of the
Obama administration while being protected by the Secret Service.
Hunter,
the son of then-Vice President Joe Biden, flew 411 times domestically
and internationally during the time span covered by the documents,
including to 29 different countries. He made five trips to China.
23
of those flights came into or out of Joint Base Andrew, which is home
to Air Force One and Air Force Two. Why was he flying to and from an
American military base?
The
continuing miniaturization of electronics is opening up some exciting
possibilities when it comes to what we might place in our bodies to
monitor and improve our health. Engineers at Columbia University have
demonstrated an extreme version of this technology, developing the
smallest single-chip system ever created, which could be implanted
with a hypodermic needle to measure temperature inside the body, and
possibly much more.
From
ladybug-sized implants that track oxygen levels in deep body tissues
to tiny "neural dust" sensors that monitor nerve signals in
real time, scientists are making big steps when it comes to the
functionality of tiny electronic devices. The implant developed by
the Columbia Engineers breaks new ground as the world's smallest
single-chip system, which is a completely functional electronic
circuit with a total volume of less than 0.1 mm3.
The
Occupational Safety and Health Administration threw workers under the
bus over the weekend by pulling their new guidance which stated that
employers they may be held liable for "any adverse reactions"
if they mandate employees take COVID-19 vaccines "as a condition
of their employment."
What
the many graphs below clearly indicate are two crucial data points
about the Covid Super Vaccination Agenda.
First,
that virtually every country in the world was trending downward —
precipitously — as the world community of nations started to
approach natural herd immunity for COVID-19 at the end of 2020 and
beginning of 2021.
Secondly,
that as soon as the various Covid vaccines were rolled out worldwide,
virtually every country was saw a sharp spike in SAR-COV-2 cases, and
especially in Covid deaths.
The
red line in each graph below shows the trending toward herd immunity.
The blue line indicates the extraordinary Covid death spikes which
occurred shortly after each nation rolled out their vaccine programs.
Such
an obvious genocidal outcome could only have occurred by highly
purposeful design; and with the close coordination of numerous
national, corporate, NGO and other institutional co-conspirators.
Project
Veritas on Monday released video of two Facebook insiders blowing the
whistle on the social media giant’s effort to secretly censor Covid
vaccine concerns on a global scale.
Tedros
Adhanom Ghebreyesus warned countries against becoming complacent and
praised health care workers battling on the frontlines of the
COVID-19 pandemic.
World
Health Organisation (WHO) Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
issued a strong warning while addressing the UN's health agency's
annual assembly of health ministers from its 194 member states.
"The
world remains in a very dangerous situation," said Ghebreyesus,
cautioning countries against assuming they were "out of the
woods," no matter how successful their vaccination rate might
be.
Many
residents in a small county in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula are now
declaring that they “identify as fully vaccinated” as a result of
recent guidance that allows inoculated citizens to go out in public
without wearing masks.
Many
residents in a small county in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula are now
declaring that they “identify as fully vaccinated” as a result of
recent guidance that allows inoculated citizens to go out in public
without wearing masks.
Axios
and Public Citizen have obtained new documents suggesting that the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) owns half of the key patent on
Moderna’s up-and-coming vaccine for the Wuhan coronavirus
(COVID-19).
Should
the vaccine come to market, the NIH will reportedly collect half of
the royalties associated with its distribution. At the same time,
four NIH scientists have filed provisional patents on their own
claiming to be “co-inventors” of the experimental jab.
Many
people do not know this, but the current cap on royalties for agency
scientists who help develop a vaccine is set at $150,000. This means
that there is a financial incentive to attach one’s name to vaccine
development, incentivizing the creation of potentially useless and
dangerous new drugs.
United
Airlines is attempting to incentivize flyers to get the COVID-19
vaccination by giving them the chance to win flights for a year's
worth of travel.
In
an effort to increase the number of vaccinated adults, Georgia’s
Hall and Dawson counties are offering a new incentive through the
legal system: People who are or will be performing community service
as part of their sentence could have their sentences cut in half by
getting the COVID-19 vaccine.
The
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) are using deliberate acts of
deception, medical fraud and data manipulation to artificially boost
the appearance of “efficacy” for the new mRNA vaccine
experiments. The fraud is out in the open as of May 1, 2021 because
the CDC made sweeping new policy changes that fraudulently alter the
definition of a “covid case” after vaccination.
Overnight,
all “asymptomatic” and mild “covid cases” no longer count, as
long as the person is fully vaccinated. The CDC is manipulating the
data to blame all future “covid cases” on the unvaccinated, to
perpetuate a cycle of medical fraud and force vaccines on the
population.
The
CDC is also manipulating the data to conceal the fact that those who
get covid-19 post vaccination are up to ten times more likely to die
than those who get covid-19 WITHOUT vaccination. Of the 9,245
reported covid cases post-vaccination, the CDC found that 132 people
(1 percent) died.
White
House press secretary Jen Psaki lost her patience with Fox News'
Peter Doocy at Monday's press briefing as he pressed her on whether
the Biden administration was doing enough to expose the origins of
COVID-19, after Dr. Fauci questioned where the virus originated.
The
federal government says it is dropping a standard requirement that
employers report any negative side effects employees may face as a
result of mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations because it wants to promote
those shots.
WND
reported a little over a week ago that the Occupational Health and
Safety Administration, at that time, released guidance that notes,
"In general, an adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is
recordable if the reaction is: (1) work-related, (2) a new case, and
(3) meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR
1904.7 (e.g., days away from work, restricted work or transfer to
another job, medical treatment beyond first aid)."
Actually,
it looks like this virus did come from a lab in China. Nearly a year
and a half into the pandemic, that’s the new consensus in the
American media. Boy, these things change fast. There are holdouts of
course. Just today, over at the Washington Post, a China shill called
Michael Gerson wrote a hilariously overwrought column entitled:
"The
right is dwelling on slanderous myths about the origins of COVID-19."
The radical right! Slanderous myths! Russian QAnon sleeper cells
slandering the Chinese government! It’s pretty funny. The good news
is, it’s almost over. You’re probably not going to see a lot more
columns like that going forward. The nonsense is finally dying down.
Washington
Post Fact Checker Glenn Kessler declared the Wuhan coronavirus
lab-leak theory "suddenly credible" on Tuesday, after
previously mocking Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and others last year for
espousing the "virtually impossible" theory.
"The
source of the coronavirus that has left more than 3 million people
dead around the world remains a mystery. But in recent months the
idea that it emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) —
once dismissed as a ridiculous conspiracy theory — has gained new
credence," Kessler wrote, in a timeline article about how the
story developed over the past year.
One
of the outlets to dismiss it as a "ridiculous conspiracy theory"
was Kessler's: the Washington Post reported on Feb. 17, 2020, that
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., had "repeated a fringe theory
suggesting that the ongoing spread of a coronavirus is connected to
research in the disease-ravaged epicenter of Wuhan, China."
Kessler passively referred to the article as "critical" of
Cotton.
Former
President Donald Trump is now saying without question that the
coronavirus originated from a Chinese lab, following a report on
intelligence that thee Chinese scientists were hospitalized in
November 2019.
As
evidence mounts that a Wuhan lab leak is to blame for the COVID
outbreak, it has been revealed that Joe Biden’s administration
halted a probe launched by President Trump into the theory.
The
investigation was started by the State Department under former
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has repeatedly called for a
thorough inquiry into the lab leak theory.
Joe
Biden's team shut down a State Department investigation into the
Wuhan laboratory as a source of the COVID-19 outbreak, according to a
new report on Tuesday night.
Today
on TRUNEWS, host Edward Szall explores the collaboration between big
tech censors and the Chinese Communist controllers. A new video from
Project Veritas has introduced two new whistleblowers that shows how
Facebook did more than suppress ‘conspiracy theories’, but also
verifiable data and facts.
A
change in the China Wuhan lab narrative is becoming apparent,
shifting from denial of the source of the virus to an ‘accidental
release’.
Thousands
of Americans have caught Covid-19 despite being fully vaccinated, the
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have said – but they
insist the data suggests such “breakthrough” infections are
relatively rare.
There were 10,262 cases of fully vaccinated
people being infected with Covid-19 as of April 30, the CDC said on
Tuesday, citing reports from 46 US states and territories. Less than
7% of the patients were hospitalized with Covid-19 symptoms, and
1.6%, or 160, died. The median age for all cases was 58, and 63% of
those infected were female.
Sen.
Rand Paul (R-KY) claimed Dr. Anthony Fauci committed perjury over his
gain of function comments related to Communist China’s Wuhan lab.
Paul
was asked on Real America’s Voice’s The Water Cooler show, “do
you believe he [Fauci] perjured himself?”
“Absolutely,
he lied to the America people. There was gain of function research
going on with Dr. Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute,” Fauci
explained.
In
her paper, she actually thanked Dr. Fauci and National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is a part of National
Institutes of Health (NIH) that Dr. Fauci runs,” Paul continued.
“It’s
listed at the end of the paper. This paper was fined by NIAID
research and it lists a ten digit number that identifies the research
money she got from from the United States. Was it gain of function?”
Paul asked.
May
26
Sen.
Rand Paul (R-KY) claimed Dr. Anthony Fauci committed perjury over his
gain of function comments related to Communist China’s Wuhan lab.
Paul
was asked on Real America’s Voice’s The
Water Cooler
show, “do you believe he [Fauci] perjured himself?”
“Absolutely,
he lied to the America people. There was gain of function research
going on with Dr. Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute,” Fauci
explained.
In
her paper, she actually thanked Dr. Fauci and National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is a part of National
Institutes of Health (NIH) that Dr. Fauci runs,” Paul continued.
“It’s
listed at the end of the paper. This paper was fined by NIAID
research and it lists a ten digit number that identifies the research
money she got from from the United States. Was it gain of
function?” Paul asked.
“Well
it took a SARS virus, which is a coronavirus, that’s 15 times more
deadly than COVID, and it added to it S protein, which is something
in the surface of it, to make it more easily infectious to epithelial
cells for the respiratory tract. That to me is gain of function,”
he said.
Paul
went on to highlight two scientists, one from Rutgers University and
another from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who confirmed the
paper studies gain of function.
The
allegation of perjury comes after Paul questioned Fauci on May 12, “Dr.
Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH funding of the
lab in Wuhan?”
“Senator
Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely, entirely, and
completely incorrect,” a frustrated Fauci responded. “The
NIH has not ever and does not now fund
gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
Republican
lawmakers demanded Dr. Anthony Fauci be terminated from his role as
the nation’s top infectious disease expert after he was accused of
flip-flopping on key COVID-related topics like mask-wearing and the
origins of the coronavirus.
As
reported in several previous articles, the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — a division of the
National Institute of Health (NIH) headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci since
1984 — has, for years, provided grants to the EcoHealth Alliance
and others to conduct gain-of-function (GoF) research on
coronaviruses.
EcoHealth
Alliance, in turn, farmed out some of this research to the Wuhan
Institute of Virology (WIV), from whence SARS-CoV-2 appears to have
emerged. In a May 11, 2021, Senate hearing, Sen. Rand Paul questioned
Fauci on the NIAID’s funding of GoF research on bat coronaviruses,
some of which was conducted at the WIV.
Fauci
denied the charge, saying “The NIH has not ever, and does not now,
fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”1 It’s a
curious denial, considering the NIH’s funding of such research has
been thoroughly documented and can be easily double-checked.
Chinese
scientists sequenced the genome of SARS-CoV-2 in early January 2020
and by March of that year had “irrefutably” concluded the virus
was not of human design. Since then, the goalposts have shifted
repeatedly in an attempt to keep laboratory escape a viable theory,
despite no evidence to support the continued supposition.
Amid
a flurry of statements by US health figures suggesting a deeper probe
of the Wuhan Institute of Virology is warranted as part of the hunt
for the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19,
China’s state media has shot back, suggesting that the top US
biolab at Fort Detrick should also be investigated.
“If
they see the ‘lab leak’ theory as one of the directions of the
investigation, the Wuhan Institute of Virology should not be the only
one included,” the editors of the Global Times, a daily paper
published by the Communist Party-owned People’s Daily, wrote on
Wednesday.
General Mike Flynn blasted the Biden Administration’s effort
to cover up the origins of Covid-19 during an interview with Rose
Unplugged on Wednesday.
The Wuhan lab leak theory is not really a theory anymore so
the Biden Admin is working overtime to hide the truth about Covid-19.
The Biden State Department quietly ended an inquiry into the
origins of Covid-19 and whether it leaked from the Wuhan lab.
On Wednesday, Biden ordered the intelligence community to
“redouble their efforts to collect and analyze information that could
bring us closer to a definitive conclusion, and to report back to me in
90 days.”
General Flynn said his intuition is telling him that Covid
was a weaponized operation by China.
“I believe something has happened,” Flynn said. “My intuition
tells me….We’ve had over a year of people all over the world having to
answer tough questions,” Flynn said Wednesday on 1320 AM WJAS.
As
I’ve been documenting for the past year, the COVID experts have
been contradicting themselves six ways from Sunday. As charlatans,
they’re abject failures. They can’t keep their own story
straight.
Thanks
to an alert reader, I’ve come across a new blockbuster.
BY
THEIR OWN STANDARDS, the FDA should never have allowed the Pfizer
COVID vaccine to be shot into a single arm. The Agency’s Emergency
Use Authorization was a crime—according to their own data.
Here
we go.
The
document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines
and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA
Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]
It
is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the
information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial,
based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.
A
key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of
suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population,
1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who
received a saltwater shot].”
Those
shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.
The
comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at
preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than no
vaccine at all—the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.
To
make all this clear, I need to back up and explain the theory of the
vaccine clinical trial.
The
researchers assumed the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading everywhere in
the world, and during the clinical trial, it would descend on some
volunteers.
The
billion-dollar question was: how many people receiving the vaccine
would become infected, vs. how many people in the placebo group?
If
it turned out that FAR FEWER people getting the vaccine became
infected with SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine would be hailed as a success.
It protected people against the virus.
But
as you can see from the numbers above, that wasn’t the case at all.
So
now we come to the vital weasel-phrase in the FDA document I just
quoted: “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 [cases].”
“Well,
you see, we can’t say these were ACTUAL COVID-19 cases. Maybe they
were, maybe they weren’t. They’re in limbo. We want to keep them
in limbo. Otherwise, our clinical trial is dead in the water, and
we’ll never get approval for the vaccine.”
What
does “suspected cases” mean? It can only mean these people all
displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but
they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative,
not positive.
However,
if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected
cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?
Something
is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters,
obscuring facts.
By
FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested
positive, period.
That’s
the way cases are counted.
These
several thousand volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial were either
COVID-19 cases or they weren’t. Which is it?
The
official response to that question is obvious: the FDA decided to
throw the data from all those suspected cases in the garbage and
ignore them. Poof. Gone.
Why
do I say that?
Because
if the FDA had paid serious attention to the several thousand
“suspected cases,” they never would have authorized the vaccine
for public use. They would have stopped the clinical trial and
undertaken a very deep and extensive investigation.
Which
they didn’t.
This
is called a crime.
“But…but
it’s not that simple. This is a complex situation. It’s a gray
area.”
“No.
It isn’t. If you were running a clinical trial of a new drug, and a
few thousand people in the trial, who were given the drug,
nevertheless came down with the disease symptoms the drug was
supposed to cure, wouldn’t you cancel the trial and go back to the
drawing board?”
“You
mean if we were being honest? That’s a joke, right? We’re not
honest. Don’t you get it?”
Yes.
I get it. You’re criminals. Killers.
But
wait. There’s more. The FDA document also states: “Suspected
COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were
409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”
That’s
explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots
became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been
enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.
In
fact, the FDA document tries to excuse those 409 cases with a
slippery comment: “It is possible that the imbalance in suspected
COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents
vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of
COVID-19.”
Translation:
You see, a number of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and adverse
effects from the vaccine are the same. Therefore, we have no idea
whether the vaccinated people developed COVID or were just reacting
to the vaccine. So we’re going to ignore this whole mess and
pretend it’s of no importance.
Back
in April of 2020, I predicted the vaccine manufacturers would use
this strategy to explain away COVID cases occurring in the vaccine
groups of their clinical trials.
It’s
called cooking the data. It’s a way of writing off and ignoring
COVID symptoms in the vaccine group—and instead saying, “The
vaccine is safe and effective.”
And
the FDA document, as I stated above, just puts an impenetrable cloud
over all the volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial by inventing a
category called “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases,” and
throwing those crucial data away, never to be spoken of again.
I’m
speaking about them now. Any sensible person, looking at them, would
conclude that the vaccine should never have been authorized.
Unless
fraud, deception, profits, and destruction of human life via the
vaccine were and are the true goals.
Finally:
When you have “suspected cases,” and their ultimate status
depends on doing a test, you do the test. You do it as many times as
you need to, until it registers positive or negative. Then each
“suspected case” becomes an actual case or no case at all.
Perhaps
these “suspected cases” in the clinical trial were tested, and
many of them came up positive, revealing they were actual COVID
cases—but the researchers lied and covered up the fact that they
were tested.
Or
if you really don’t want to know whether “suspected cases” are
actual cases, you don’t test them. You leave them in a convenient
limbo and park them, never to be seen again.
Either
way, the situation is patently absurd. By official standards, the PCR
test decides whether a person is a case or not a case. Just do the
test. Saying “we don’t know” is nothing more than a con and a
hustle.
I’d
love to hear the researchers try to talk their way out of this one.
Here is how the conversation might go:
“So
you’re saying these several thousand suspected COVID cases couldn’t
be adjudicated one way or another?”
“That’s
right. Their PCR tests were ‘indeterminate’.”
“That
says something devastating about the test itself.”
“Well,
sometimes you just can’t tell whether it’s positive or negative.”
“I
see. And this ‘indeterminate’ result occurred in SEVERAL THOUSAND
suspected cases.”
“I
guess so, yes.”
“You
know, you could have done something else with these suspected cases.
A different test. You could have taken tissue samples and looked for
the virus itself in a more direct way.”
“No.
That wouldn’t work.”
“Why
not?”
“Because…the
actual virus…”
“Because
no one has been able to come up with a specimen of the actual
SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
“Right.”
“So
tell me—what does that indicate? I’ll tell you what it indicates.
You can’t prove the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists.
“I
have to go. I’m late for a meeting.”
“You’re
late for more than just a meeting. Is it true a person becomes a
virologist by cutting out a coupon from the back of a comic book and
mailing it to a PO Box in Maryland?’
During
2020, many people learned more about coronaviruses, and specifically
the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19. Pictures of the spiked
virus have been plastered across the news media.
The
image is reminiscent of a chain mace, or flail. This was a medieval
weapon with a spiked steel ball at the end of a chain or leather
strap. The image may be frightening. It turns out researchers believe
the spikes are responsible for significant vascular damage leading to
severe disease.1
Most
people will be infected at least one time in their lives by some type
of coronavirus. If the COVID-19 pandemic is the first time you’ve
heard about coronaviruses, you should know the first one was
discovered in chickens in 1930.2 A few decades later
the first human coronavirus was identified.3
Currently,
scientists have identified four types of coronaviruses that are
endemic and can cause up to 15% of common colds.4 Interestingly,
if all coronaviruses have originated in the wild, the rate at which
the virus is mutating has accelerated dramatically in 20 years.
In
the last two decades, three new coronaviruses have emerged: SARS in
November 2002;5 MERS in September 2012;6 and
SARS-CoV-2 in December 2019.7 The symptoms of
COVID-19 from an infection with SARS-CoV-2 can vary to a great
extent.
Some
people carrying the virus have had no symptoms. Others report fever,
headache, body aches, dry cough, loss of appetite and loss of
smell.8 In others, more severe symptoms can develop
that affect the respiratory tract and lead to pneumonia.
Approximately
36% of individuals have experienced gastrointestinal symptoms or
neurological symptoms, either with or without respiratory
symptoms.9 A
recent paper published in Circulation Research10 revealed
it is the spiked proteins on the virus that play a key role in your
symptoms.
Spiked
SARS-CoV-2 Damages More Than Your Lungs
A
team of researchers including scientists from the University of
California San Diego evaluated the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in
animals. The researchers were not surprised by the clinical findings,
but the data revealed a detailed explanation of how the spike (S)
protein triggers damage to the vascular system.11
The
researchers created a pseudo virus, or cell surrounded by the spike
proteins that did not contain a virus.12 Using an
animal model, the researchers administered the pseudo virus into the
lungs and found the virus was not necessary to create damage.
Instead, the spike protein was enough to cause inflammation.
The
experiment was then replicated in the lab using cell cultures. The
team exposed healthy endothelial cells that line your arteries to the
spiked pseudo virus. Past studies had demonstrated that exposure to
the SARS-CoV-2 virus elicited damage to the cells by binding to
angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).
However,
the team found the cells responded in a similar way when exposed to
the pseudo virus. When the S protein attached to the ACE2
receptor it disrupted signaling to the mitochondria and
caused damage and fragmentation. The alterations in mitochondrial
function were confirmed as part of the inhibition of ACE2 signaling
in the lab.
The
results also revealed that the virus could induce endothelial cell
inflammation and endotheliitis. The protein reportedly decreased ACE2
levels and impaired nitric oxide bioavailability.13 Co-senior
author of the study, Uri Manor, explained in a press release from
Salk Institute:14
“If
you remove the replicating capabilities of the virus, it still has a
major damaging effect on the vascular cells, simply by virtue of its
ability to bind to this ACE2 receptor, the S protein receptor, now
famous thanks to COVID. Further studies with mutant spike proteins
will also provide new insight towards the infectivity and severity of
mutant SARS-CoV-2 viruses.”
Long
Haul Symptoms May Be Related to Vascular Damage
Some
of the symptoms from COVID-19 that last weeks or months for some
people may be the result of vascular damage. People who have had
these symptoms have been given the name “long haulers.”15
In
theory, they have recovered from the worst symptoms of the illness
and test negative. Yet, they continue to have symptoms without an
active infection. According to a paper in JAMA,16 approximately
10% of people who have had COVID-19 may experience long
haul symptoms.
The
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention17 report
that a combination of the following symptoms without an active COVID
infection can appear weeks after the infection and last for months.
Symptoms may worsen after physical or mental activity.
The
predominant pathophysiology of COVID-19 includes endothelial damage
and microvascular injury, stimulation of hyperinflammation and
hypercoagulability.18 A recent review in
Physiological Reports19 examined how the capillary
damage and inflammation from endotheliitis triggered by COVID-19
could contribute to the persistent symptoms by interfering with
tissue oxygenation.
The
combined effects of capillary damage in multiple key organs may
accelerate hypoxia related inflammation and lead to long haul
symptoms. Although exercise temporarily worsens long haul symptoms
and some have rejected high-intensity interval training (HIIT) as an
option, one paper published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
from Denmark suggests the opposite.20
The
authors of this study argue that the pathophysiology of COVID-19 may
be overcome by the physiological
effects of HIIT and it should be considered as one of the
rehabilitation choices to potentially reverse these symptoms. They
propose that exercise could increase viral clearance and modulate
TNF-alpha and interleukin-1 beta signaling.
This
may in turn reduce vascular inflammation. They acknowledge that HIIT
is the most controversial type of exercise intervention to be
prescribed after COVID-19, due to the risk of sudden cardiac arrest
secondary to cardiovascular damage.
Several
experts21,22 recommend even those accustomed to high
intensity exercise should first complete a cardiovascular exam and
approach their return to physical activity gradually. They cite a
small retrospective study of 28 people with a history of COVID-19 in
which the researchers concluded that “comprehensive cardiopulmonary
rehabilitation after COVID-19 is safe, feasible, and effective.”23
Early
Treatment May Reduce the Number of Long Haulers
In
my interview
with Dr. Vladimir Zelenko in March 2021, we discussed the
treatment of COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine. At that point, Zelenko
had treated 3,000 patients with symptoms of COVID-19 and only three
of his high-risk patients had subsequently succumbed to the disease.
While
the focus of the interview was on treatment protocols and the use of
the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine, Zelenko shared an
interesting statistic about his protocol. In the early months of
COVID-19, Zelenko decided to treat his high-risk patients as early as
possible, without waiting for severe symptoms. This turned out to be
one key to his significant success.
Without
waiting for test results that often took five days, by which time
high-risk patients were exhibiting more severe symptoms, he started
treatment immediately. His understanding of the mechanism behind
hydroxychloroquine and zinc led to using the combination alongside
azithromycin, to prevent bacterial pneumonia and other bacterial
infections common with COVID.
What
is interesting are the statistics for Zelenko’s patients with long
haul symptoms. As I’ve discussed, approximately 10% of the
population that is infected with COVID-19 will go on to experience
persistent symptoms.24 However, Zelenko has treated
3,000 patients and none who received treatment within the first five
days went on to develop long-haul symptoms.
While
he has had patients with persistent symptoms from COVID-19, they
sought medical care after the first five days of symptoms, which
meant the inflammatory process had advanced. From his experience, and
the experience of the patients he treated, early intervention with
the protocol nearly eliminated the risk of persistent symptoms.
Researchers
Find Another Vaccine Target
During
vaccine development, researchers and pharmaceutical companies have
focused on the spike protein that surrounds the virus. It appears
that this is how the virus enters the cells and it seemed reasonable
if the virus could not replicate inside the cells, the infection
could be stopped.
However,
as has been discovered, the virus has more than just a single spike
protein.25 There are four proteins that form the
structure surrounding the RNA. There is an envelope (E), a membrane
(M) and a nucleocapsid (N), in addition to the spike (S). Your immune
system recognizes all four of these proteins. Researchers have
discovered humans make more antibodies to the N protein than the S
protein.26
However,
it seemed counterintuitive to address the N protein since this is
found inside the structure with the viral RNA. Therefore, any
antibodies your body makes against the N protein will not block the
virus from entering the cells.27 New information has
revealed that once the N protein antibodies get inside the cell they
are recognized by an antibiotic receptor, TRIM21.
This
antibody receptor shreds the N protein, which then reaches the
surface of an infected cell. Your body’s T cells recognize the
fragments and kill the cell along with any virus. This has suggested
to researchers that inducing N protein antibodies may be another way
of stimulating the immune response against SARS-CoV-2.
Another
benefit of focusing on the N protein is that it has a lower mutation
rate.28 In other words, as the virus mutates in the
wild the current vaccine may no longer have any effectiveness against
it, in much the same way that the flu vaccine must be altered each
year to address influenza variants. The sequence in the N protein is
more stable, so researchers postulate that a vaccine may be effective
for a longer period.
List
of Current Vaccine Side Effects Is Growing
Early
in May 2021, reports from France indicated five cases of myocarditis
were found in those who had taken the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine.
Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle that can have
lifelong effects as it weakens the muscle and creates scar tissue.29
The
national medicines safety agency (ANSM) released their weekly vaccine
update, saying “five cases have been declared in France.”30 The
agency didn’t feel there was enough information to conclude the
vaccine had played a role but would continue to monitor reports.
Over
13.5 million doses of COVID vaccines have been administered in France
since April 22, 2021. The ANSM reports 16,030 adverse events from
those who had been vaccinated. Israel has also reported several cases
of myocarditis after people receive their second dose.
A
review of the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
shows 12 reports of myocarditis were recorded in the U.S. by April
30, 2021. According to Our World in Data,31 by April
30, 2021, 30.32% of the population in the U.S. had been fully
vaccinated. VAERS also showed there were 157,277 adverse events
reported by April 30, 2021.32
These
numbers are likely far lower than the actual number of people who
have experienced adverse events from the vaccines. Research
data33 show
health care providers identify and report vaccine adverse events in
woefully low numbers. In fact, the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19
vaccine was recently paused to teach doctors how
to report vaccine injuries.34 The
pause has since been lifted in the U.S.
It
is crucial to report a vaccine injury or side effect to VAERS, as the
data are essential in helping individuals, doctors and researchers
make informed decisions. You can make your own report online or using
a PDF by going to the Vaccine
Adverse Event Reporting System.35 You’ll
find more information about adverse events and how vaccines affect
your health at the National
Vaccine Information Center.36
"The
Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people,
equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its
protection all classes of men, at all times and under all
circumstances. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was
ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can
be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government."
— Ex Parte Milligan, Supreme Court of the United States, 1866.
Last
week, the media in New Jersey began to ask Gov. Phil Murphy when he
would surrender his emergency powers. He claimed emergency powers in
March 2020, and he also claimed that
those powers are not limited by the Constitution when he said on Fox
that the Bill of Rights is above his pay grade. His reply to the
media inquiries was that he will surrender them when he surrenders
them!
I
am using the example of Murphy in order to address the concept of
emergency powers, but there is no hyperbole here. Murphy
quite literally issued executive orders barring folks from doing what
the Constitution guarantees them the right to do, and he imposed
criminal penalties for violating his orders, and he had folks who
defied him arrested and prosecuted. Stated differently, he assumed
the powers of the state legislature — which is to write the laws —
and he violated his oath to uphold the Constitution.
He
claimed that somehow he can interfere with the exercise of basic
human freedoms — like going to church, going to work, shopping for
food, operating a business, assembling and traveling — because he
declared a state of emergency.
If
the government declares an emergency, can it thereby acquire the
lawful power to interfere with constitutionally guaranteed freedoms?
In a word: No.
Here
is the backstory.
When
the states formed the federal government in 1789, they did so
pursuant to the Constitution. The Constitution was written to
establish and to limit the federal government. In 1791, just two
years later, the Constitution was amended to add the Bill of Rights.
The original understanding of the Bill of Rights was that it
restrained only the federal government by articulating negative
rights.
A
negative right restrains the government from interfering with the
exercise of a preexisting right. Thus, the First Amendment does not
grant the freedom of speech — because it comes from our humanity —
but it does prohibit Congress from infringing upon it.
After
the War Between the States, Congress sent the 14th Amendment to the
states for ratification. Its history is tortuous, and in part
repellant, but it was ratified, and it is the law of the land. It has
been interpreted and applied by the courts as imposing the Bill of
Rights upon the states. Thus, any right expressly or arguably
protected from federal interference by the Bill of Rights is
protected from state interference as well.
The
Ninth Amendment — which today restrains the feds and the states —
is the work of James Madison's genius. Madison, who chaired the House
of Representatives committee that wrote the Bill of Rights, wrestled
along with his colleagues about the best way to protect unenumerated
rights.
The
big-government crowd in Congress did not want any enumerated rights
to be expressed. They argued that by listing a few, the unlisted
rights would be subject to government assault.
The
small-government crowd argued that by listing no rights as immune
from government interference, the Constitution would invite the
government to assault whatever rights it wished.
Madison's
solution to all this was to add a Bill of Rights and include the
Ninth Amendment. That amendment recognizes that we all have
pre-political, fundamental, natural rights — too numerous to
enumerate — and prohibits all government from disparaging them.
During
the War Between the States, Abraham Lincoln did more than disparage
them. He ordered the military to arrest newspaper editors and even
public officials in the North and confine them without trial because
he disapproved of their criticism of him. One of them, Lambdin P.
Milligan, sued for his freedom, and he won.
In
a unanimous decision, cited hundreds of times, the Supreme Court
rejected the concept that "emergency" somehow creates or
increases government power. The court condemned "emergency"
as a doctrine the fruits of which none is "more pernicious."
This condemnation is still the law of the land today, and it applies
to the states as well as to the feds.
Thus,
no matter the exigency — war, floods, pandemic, fear, myth —
individual natural rights, protected from government interference by
the Ninth Amendment, trump the unconstitutional words of government
officials and invalidate their efforts to enforce compliance.
Murphy's orders contain empty words because they do not have the
force of law since they were not legislatively created and they
directly contradict the Constitution and the Supreme Court's most
definitive interpretations of it.
When
Murphy became the governor of New Jersey, he took an oath to enforce
the Constitution. Whatever personal ignorance or mental reservations
he may have had, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and
every public official, federal and state, is bound by it.
If
government officials could declare an emergency whenever they wished
and thereby be relieved of the obligation to defend the Constitution
— and the rights it guarantees — then no liberty is safe.
Because
our rights are natural and individual and because we did not all
consent to their suspension, no government may morally or
constitutionally suspend them, and we must resist all efforts to do
so. Of course, there is a dark side to this. The government that has
destroyed liberty and property has also immunized itself from
financial liability for the consequences of those destructions.
Yet,
as Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence,
whenever any government destroys liberty and property, it is the
right of the people to alter or abolish it.
One
week after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
announced it was investigating heart inflammation in recently
vaccinated young adults, Connecticut reported 18 new cases of heart
problems among teens who had received a COVID vaccine.
All
18 cases resulted in hospitalization — the vast majority for a
couple of days, reported NBC Connecticut. The cases were reported to
the Connecticut Department of Public Health by vaccine providers,
said Deirdre Gifford, acting health commissioner.
“One
individual that we’re aware of is still hospitalized,” Guifford
said Monday. “The other 17 have been sent home and they’re doing
fine.”
The
first case at Connecticut Children’s was Rachel Hatton’s
17-year-old son, Gregory.
Alphabet
Inc.’s GOOG 1.02% Google and national hospital chain HCA Healthcare
Inc. HCA 0.77% have struck a deal to develop healthcare algorithms
using patient records, the latest foray by a tech giant into the $3
trillion healthcare sector.
HCA,
which operates across about 2,000 locations in 21 states, would
consolidate and store with Google data from digital health records
and internet-connected medical devices under the multiyear agreement.
Google and HCA engineers will work to develop algorithms to help
improve operating efficiency, monitor patients and guide doctors’
decisions, according to the companies.
“Data
are spun off of every patient in real time,” said Dr. Jonathan
Perlin, chief medical officer of HCA, which is based in Nashville,
Tenn. “Part of what we’re building is a central nervous system to
help interpret the various signals.”
Julie
Cohn was fully vaccinated when she went to cheer at her 12-year-old
son’s basketball game in March. Midway through the match, he asked
to remove his mask because he was getting so hot. She thought little
of it.
Three
days later, he had a sore throat. He tested positive for the
coronavirus, as did his younger brother a few days later. Ms. Cohn
cared for them, thinking she was protected, but she woke up with what
seemed like a head cold on March 28. The next day, she, too, tested
positive.
Investigative
journalist James O’Keefe from Project Veritas on Monday released a
bombshell video of two Facebook insiders blowing the whistle on the
tech giant’s effort to secretly censor — on a global scale —
COVID vaccine questions and concerns.
The
Facebook whistleblowers alleged the company is pushing an initiative
to censor vaccine hesitancy on its platform.
According
to new leaked documents, the social media giant uses algorithms to
target users who disseminate messaging that runs counter to the
company’s political ideology and vaccine narrative — even if the
comments are factually accurate.
An
internal memo obtained by Project Veritas explained “Vaccine
Hesitancy Comment Demotion.” O’Keefe told Sean Hannity on Monday
that Facebook initiated a “beta” test for the algorithm that
classifies some users under two incremental tiers of what they dub
“vaccine hesitancy” or a “VH Score,” and does so without the
user’s knowledge.
Electronics
are getting imperceptibly small, opening new avenues for medical
technology to place advanced monitoring and treatment devices inside
our bodies. And Columbia University engineers just demonstrated a new
and revolutionary version of this, creating the world’s smallest
single-chip system ever developed, according to a recent study
published in the journal Science Advances.
And,
critically, the tiny new chip can be implanted via a hypodermic
needle to measure internal body temperature, and potentially much
more.
high-profile
European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across
Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel
coronavirus on that continent.
Dr.
Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal
medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without
providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.
Another
stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA)
president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently
“impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.
He
also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any
antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.
These
stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’
and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re
rushing into clinical trials around the world.
So
why are journalists not covering it?
Michael Capuzzo, a New York
Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The
Drug That Cracked Covid”. The 15-page article chronicles the
gargantuan struggle being waged by frontline doctors on all
continents to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as
well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social
media companies to thwart them.
Because
of ivermectin, Capuzzo says, there are “hundreds of thousands,
actually millions, of people around the world, from Uttar Pradesh in
India to Peru to Brazil, who are living and not dying.” Yet media
outlets have done all they can to “debunk” the notion that
ivermectin may serve as an effective, easily accessible and
affordable treatment for Covid-19. They have parroted the arguments
laid out by health regulators around the world that there just isn’t
enough evidence to justify its use.
The
FDA approved genetically engineered salmon as “safe and effective”
in 2015 but now the land-locked harvest is rolling out to commercial
institutions nationwide. Critics have nicknamed the product
“Frankenfish”.
Normally,
the term GMO, or Genetically Modified Organism, would apply. In this
case, the salmon are clearly identified as “genetically engineered”
because of extensive DNA editing. It is only a matter of time before
they spread to wild fish. ? Technocracy News & Trends Editor
Patrick Wood
By:
Casey Smith via AP
The
inaugural harvest of genetically modified salmon began this week
after the pandemic delayed the sale of the first such altered animal
to be cleared for human consumption in the United States, company
officials said.
President
Biden's decision to give intelligence agencies 90 days to determine
the origins of the coronavirus, along with last night's revelation
that US intelligence agencies have been sitting on a massive pile of
evidence suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 leaked from the Wuhan Institute
of Virology, has prompted the CCP to fire up its propaganda machine.
In
comments made Thursday, a top spokesman for China's Foreign Ministry
revived one of the CCP's favorite false narratives from the early
days of the outbreak: the notion that the virus was created in the US
(not China), and was purposefully deployed by the American military
to undermine Chinese society.
Hours
after President Biden promised to release the 'full report' from US
Intelligence community's 90-day examination of where COVID-19
originated - unless there's something he's unaware of...
...the
New York Times reports, there's things he's unaware of.
Namely,
'a raft of still-unexamined evidence that required additional
computer analysis that might shed light on the mystery,"
according to anonymous senior administration officials.
In
other words, the US government has been sitting on a large collection
of intelligence in perhaps the most important investigation into an
economy-wrecking global pandemic, as China destroyed evidence and has
refused to cooperate with international probes. According to the
report, Biden's call for the new investigation was in response to the
'new' evidence.
The
independent lab that made the finding is calling on the FDA to recall
these sunscreen products.
An
independent testing lab has detected the chemical benzene, a known
human carcinogen, in 78 sunscreen products and is now calling on the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to recall the products.
The
lab, Valisure, checks medications and health care products for
quality. Recently, the company tested nearly 300 sunscreen products
and found that 27% contained benzene, according to a statement from
the company. Fourteen of the products (5%) contained benzene at
levels higher than 2 parts per million (ppm), which is the FDA's
recommended limit for benzene in medically valuable drugs that can't
be made without it.
"The
presence of this known human carcinogen in products widely
recommended for the prevention of skin cancer and that are regularly
used by adults and children is very troubling," David Light,
founder and CEO of Valisure, said in the statement.
David
Asher, who led the Trump administration’s investigation into the
origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, told Fox News on Thursday that the
Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was up to “some very hairy stuff
with synthetic biology” and that biostatisticians from the U.S.
government calculated that the odds of the coronavirus evolving
naturally was one-in-13 billion.
Asher
said that the U.S. government’s probe was finding “that there was
almost no evidence that supported a natural, zoonotic … evolution,
or source of COVID-19 … the data disproportionately stacked up as
we investigated that it was coming out of a lab or some supernatural
source.”
Asher
said that the Chinese military was involved in research in the lab
and that “they were up to some very hairy stuff with synthetic
biology and so called gain of function techniques.”
This
is not an article about whether face masks work.
As
my readers know, for the past year I’ve been demonstrating that the
SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been proven to exist. Therefore, face
masks are nothing more (or less) than a mind-control ritual.
However,
much has been written about the harm the masks cause.
And
now we have an official declaration. On April 2, 2021, Health Canada
issued an advisory, warning people not to “use face masks labelled
to contain graphene or biomass graphene.”
Andrew
Maynard covers this issue in a medium.com article, “Manufacturers
have been using nanotechnology-derived graphene in face masks—now
there are safety concerns.”
Those
concerns? Masks could create lung problems.
Of
course, since COVID-19 is claimed to be a lung disease, you can see
where that leads: the remedy turns out to cause what it’s supposed
to prevent. I could write a book detailing how many times this
“coincidence” pops up in the field of medicine.
A
new survey suggests that 83% of U.S. employers do not intend to make
COVID-19 vaccines mandatory for their employees, while another 13%
say they have yet to decide. Only 4% of those surveyed say they
intend to make the controversial vaccines mandatory for employment.
The
survey, conducted by Fisher Phillips and first reported by Law360,
reveals that while the overwhelming majority of employers do not
intend to make the COVID-19 vaccine a must-have to secure or maintain
employment, 75% of employers are encouraging their employees to
receive one of the vaccines.
Of
the employers who will not force vaccinate their employees, “over
half said they thought their workers were already vaccinated if they
wanted to be, while 15% said they don’t think their employees want
the shot, and 3% were concerned about safety.” Another third of
respondents worried that they could not legally require the COVID-19
vaccine for their employees.
Republicans
stepped up their attacks on the government's most senior infectious
diseases expert Thursday saying Dr. Anthony Fauci should be fired
after defending $600,000 in funding for a Chinese laboratory under
scrutiny for its role in the emergence of COVID-19.
Since
this article was first published under the title LancetGate:
“Scientific Corona Lies” and Big Pharma Corruption.
Hydroxychloroquine versus Gilead’s Remdesivir on July 3, 2020,
there has been a virtual censorship of debate on Hydroxychloroquine
(HCQ) largely directed against medical doctors.
On
May 22, Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 — Preliminary
Report by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
National Institutes of Health, was published by the New England
Journal of Medicine, (NEJM)
On
June 29, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is the head of NIAID granted
the “Greenlight” to Gilead Sciences Inc. despite the fact that
the study of the new experimental drug was “preliminary”.The
NIH-NIAID sponsored report (May 22) was used to justify a major
agreement with Gilead Sciences Inc.
Republicans
in Congress pounced on Facebook after the tech giant suddenly
reversed its its policy of removing posts calling the COVID-19
'man-made' now that President Joe Biden has ordered the intelligence
community to review the origins of the coronavirus.
Republican
lawmakers are calling for Dr. Anthony Fauci to resign, amid his
litany of shifting views on the coronavirus, its creator and his
position on an investigation into the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Fauci
is coming under attack from congressional Republicans who point to
his statement that the NIH assigned $600,000 for the Wuhan Institute
of Virology to study the chance that bat coronaviruses could be
transmitted to humans.
The
sudden dramatic collapse of the elite-enforced Narrative that
Covid-19 could not possibly have originated in a Chinese laboratory
is one of the most extraordinary developments in modern political
history [That Didn’t Age Well: Wuhan Propaganda From MSM Laid Bare,
by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge, May 27, 2021]. Equally dramatic but much
less well-known: the earlier collapse of the elite Narrative that, in
the words of CNN Medical Talking Head Dr. Sanjay Gupta [Tweet him]
Covid-19 “doesn’t discriminate based on race. We must learn three
chilling lessons from this scandal: (1) The authorities cannot
trusted; (2) The “Main Stream” media is only “mainstream”
because of the extent to which it will limit its questioning of these
authorities; (3) Only trusted members of the Ruling Class may
question the authorities.
A
new report published this week by The Wall Street Journal stated that
three researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) —
China’s only Biosafety level-4 laboratory — were hospitalized in
November 2019 with symptoms consistent with COVID-19.
Ohio’s
vaccine lottery initiative seems to be working as hoped, with the
state experiencing a 33% increase in new COVID-19 vaccinations the
week following its announcement.
As
of May 11, fewer than 5 million Ohioans had received at least one
dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, meaning nearly 60% of the state’s
population was still unprotected.
The
number of shots the state was administering daily had also been
trending downward for a month, prompting Ohio Governor Mike DeWine to
announce a plan that, at the time, seemed a little out there: a
lottery giving five vaccinated Ohioans $1 million each.
They
called the campaign Vax-a-Million, and all adult residents of the
state are eligible to win the money — so long as they’ve received
at least one vaccine dose by the day of the drawing.
Democratic
California Governor Gavin Newsom was ordered by a federal judge to
pay a $1.35 million settlement to a Los Angeles-area church in his
capacity as governor because of the state’s onerous lockdown rules
against houses of worship.
In
addition to paying Harvest Rock Church of Pasadena, California, U.S.
District Court Judge Jesus G. Bernal also ruled that state
restrictions on houses of worship would be permitted only if child
infections rose 100%, statewide cases are at least 26 per 100,000
people, or available ICU hospital bed capacity falls below 20%,
according to the Washington Examiner.
“Any
new public health precautions on religious worship services and
gatherings at places of worship not in the guidance [are included],”
Bernal ruled.
Arch
Deep State fixer and cover-upper, Philip Zelikow, former Executive
Director of the 9/11 Commission will be chairing the COVID Commission
Planning Group, according to the University of Virginia, whose Miller
Center for Public Affairs will serve as the group’s base to “Help
America and the world learn from this pandemic and safeguard against
future threats.”
Zelikow’s
“non-partisan” group includes Event 201 participants, the Johns
Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of Public
Health and it’s being funded by Schmidt Futures, which is Eric
Schmidt-Goolag-Alphabet-Bilderberg, the Skoll Foundation, which is
the eBay FAANGster insider philanthropy group, the Rockefeller
Foundation and Stand Together, which is Charles Koch’s
philanthropic organization.
Biden's
handlers have made a magnificent choice with this man; if
anyone can obfuscate, smear, intimate, bend realities, and lie, in
order to get the alledged "facts" positioned to meet the
government's approval, it's Zelikow!!
And
I would almost be willing to bet real money on the following; this
man has utterly no close family in the US Active Military, and hasn't
since 2002!!!!
President
Trump‘s former national security advisor Michael Flynn commented on
the renewed focus on the theory that the coronavirus came from a lab
in Wuhan, saying that he believes it was a ‘weaponised operation’.
“We’ve
had over a year of people all over the world having to answer tough
questions,” Flynn said during an interview on 1320 AM WJAS.
The
three star general continued “The people in this country are
demanding answers. I believe we what we are going to find out is that
this was a weaponized operation by the nation of China with some
collaboration… with other countries.”
My
heart goes out to everyone on this planet who lost family and friends
to this virus.
But
there are some very lingering, and difficult, questions which need to
be answered as to its origin.
And,
BTW, if China is, in fact, creating bioweapons, don't think, for one
second, that the US government is actually very far behind in these
endeavors.
Hillary
Clinton looks glum as Bill Clinton cozies up to Sting's wife Trudie
Styler at posh restaurant, show pics. Hillary Clinton sipped her
favorite white wine as her husband was deeply engrossed in a
conversation with Trudie Styler, who was caught resting her head on
Bill's shoulder while posing for a group selfie
Gov.
Newsom announced a $116.5 million COVID-19 vaccine incentive program,
including a $15 million lottery with 10 winners. Californians who get
a shot by June 15 and those already vaccinated can win the big prize.
For
Californians who are insufficiently compelled by civic duty and
self-preservation to get vaccinated, Gov. Gavin Newsom is offering
another reason to get the jab: cold, hard cash.
This
afternoon, Newsom
announced a $116.5 million “Vax for the Win” program, the
largest inoculation lottery program in the country. The money will be
split among dozens of lucky Californians: $1.5 million to each of10
“grand cash prize” winners who will be picked by random draw on
June 15,and
$50,000 each to 30 “Fridays for 30” winners to be selected by
random draw on June 4 and June 11.
The
remaining $100 million will be divided up in $50 retail gift cards
among the next 2 million Californians to complete their vaccine
regime.
“These
are real incentives,” the governor
said at a press conference. “And these are an opportunity to
say thank you to those not only seeking to get vaccinated, as we move
forward, but also those that have been vaccinated.”
According
to the most recent
state vaccine data, a little more than half of all Californians
over age 12 have been fully vaccinated. Another 13% have received one
of two shots.
That
still leaves more than 12 million Californians unvaccinated.
The
percentage vaccinated varies wildly by race and income. Among
Californians living in the top quarter of the healthiest ZIP codes,
76.6% have received at least one dose. In the least healthy quarter
in the state’s “Healthy Places” Index, the share is only 52.1%.
“Some
Californians weren’t ready to get their COVID-19 vaccine on day
one, and that’s okay. This program is designed to encourage those
who need extra support to get vaccinated and help keep California
safe,” Dr. Tomás Aragón, director of the California Department of
Public Health, said in a statement.
H.D.
Palmer, a spokesperson for the state Department of Finance, said the
lottery funding will initially come out of the state’s emergency
operations account, but will be repaid with the state’s
multi-billion
dollar allotment of federal relief funds.
“The
cost of not getting vaccinated is exponentially, incalculably
higher,” Newsom said.
The
governor noted that Californians who have already been inoculated
will be entered into both the $1.5 million and $50,000 contests. When
the state rolled out its MyTurn
website as a one-stop-shop for vaccine appointments, most
Californians turned elsewhere. But the state also maintains a
confidential registry of all vaccine recipients. The names of winners
will be kept confidential unless they volunteer to have them
released, said Newsom.
“These
are real incentives. And these are an opportunity to say thank you to
those not only seeking to get vaccinated, as we move forward, but
also those that have been vaccinated.”
But
California’s cash giveaway is the biggest yet.
For
Newsom, the program represents a political win-win. The governor has
vowed to ease most of California’s
COVID restrictions by June 15. The more vaccinated Californians,
the more likely it is that the reopening process will go off without
another surge in cases and hospitalizations. That, in turn, would be
good news for the state, but also a governor who is hoping to survive
an all-but-certain
recall election later this year.
In
a Public Policy Institute of California poll released this week, 57%
of likely voters said
they oppose removing Newsom, while 40% said they supported the
recall. In the survey, 61% approved Newsom’s handling of the
coronavirus pandemic and 75% gave the state excellent or good marks
for vaccine distribution.
Earlier
this month, the governor went on a statewide tour announcing various
goodies from his latest
revenue-rich budget proposal — a convenient mix of policymaking
and politics. Handing out even more cash to Californians in the name
of public health can’t hurt the governor’s political image
either.
Republican
John Cox quickly accused Newsom of trying to “buy votes before the
recall.”
Based
on the nearly 20 million Californians who have received at least one
dose now, the odds of winning the $1.5 million prize are 1 in 2
million — 100 times better than the chances of winning the
Powerball or Mega Millions jackpots, but for far less money.
Newsom
said the administration consulted with researchers at UCLA’s
COVID-19 Health and Politics project in putting the program together.
According
to research
conducted by political scientist Lynn Vavreck, lead researcher at
the project, about a third of survey respondents said they were “more
likely” to get a COVID vaccine if offered a cash prize of $50 to
$100. That’s compared to other tactics, including pro-vaccine
public messaging from celebrities.
“Those
types of message treatments did not work, but changing people’s
material condition — giving them a little bit of money or telling
them they don’t have to wear a mask anymore — made them more
likely,” Vavreck told CalMatters.
But
for a minority of survey respondents — about 15% — the offer of
cash backfired. That’s consistent with some
criticisms made of these lottery programs noting that some
vaccine skeptics could falsely interpret a cash reward program as an
indication that the vaccine presents a risk that has to be
compensated.
Peter
Chin-Hong, an infectious disease physician at the University of
California San Francisco, said that different people remain
unvaccinated for very different reasons — a lack of social
pressure, inconvenience, concerns about common side effects and more
unfounded and outlandish safety concerns — so a single policy isn’t
likely to convince them all.
A
possible cash incentive “will move the needle for the people on the
fence,” he said. “The people who are watching and waiting, who
are not necessarily opposed to the vaccine but waiting to see people
they know get it…that group will probably be most moved.”
Ben
covers California politics and elections. Prior to that, he was a
contributing writer for CalMatters reporting on the state's economy
and budget. Based out of the San Francisco Bay Area, he has
written... More
by Ben Christopher
Dr.
Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases, reportedly did not warn senior White House
officials in the Trump administration when the ban ended on
gain-of-function research in 2017. Fauci also previously argued that
the benefits of conducting gain-of-function research outweighed the
risk that it could spark a pandemic.
However,
the issue that has been intensely debated is whether knowledge
obtained from these experiments could inadvertently affect public
health in an adverse way, even in nations multiple time zones away.
Putting aside the specter of bioterrorism for the moment, consider
this hypothetical scenario: an important gain-of-function experiment
involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed in a
well-regulated, world-class laboratory by experienced investigators,
but the information from the experiment is then used by another
scientist who does not have the same training and facilities and is
not subject to the same regulations. In an unlikely but conceivable
turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the
virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?
Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a
scenario—however remote—should the initial experiments have been
performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the
processes involved in this decision?
Scientists
working in this field might say—as indeed I have said—that the
benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the
risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and
the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for
performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.
National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Anthony
Fauci defended “gain-of-function” research in 2012 — wherein
scientists extract viruses from the wild and engineer them to infect
humans in order to study potential therapeutics including vaccines —
as research worth risking a pandemic over.
“In
an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist
becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and
ultimately triggers a pandemic?” Fauci wrote in a paper reported
on by The Australian. “Scientists working in this field might say —
as indeed I have said — that the benefits of such experiments and
the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.”
BOMBSHELL!
Dr Fauci in 2012 wrote that “gain of function” research to juice
up bat viruses was worth risking a pandemic: “the benefits of such
experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is
more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature” @SharriMarkson
scoop https://t.co/S7ILuzgnNwpic.twitter.com/iwyPCPctId
The
revelation of Fauci’s 2012 defense of the research comes as new
reports emerge, breathing new life into the lab-leak theory among the
political establishment that dismissed the origin hypothesis, which
was always credible, as a conspiracy theory.
Reporting
on previously undisclosed intelligence this month, the Wall Street
Journal published
a story of three researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology who
were hospitalized with COVID-like symptoms in November 2019,
preceding the pandemic’s first outbreak in the Hubei province. The
lab, known for its relaxed safety protocols, was reportedly
collaborating with the Chinese military and conducting
gain-of-function research into bat coronaviruses, according
to the Trump State Department in a fact sheet not disputed by
officials in the Biden administration.
Two
years after Fauci’s defense of the high-stakes research, the U.S.
government deemed the work so dangerous it was
banned. According to longtime journalist and former New York
Times science writer Nicholas Wade, however, Fauci circumvented the
U.S. moratorium and supported gain-of-function with grant money from
the NIAID funneled through EcoHealth Alliance, operated by Dr. Peter
Daszak.
“From
June 2014 to May 2019 EcoHealth Alliance had a grant from NIAID, part
of the National Institutes of Health, to do gain-of-function research
with coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Wade
reported
in a lengthy Medium post.
Kentucky
Republican Sen. Rand Paul pressed
Fauci on U.S. tax dollars going to the Wuhan lab during a Senate
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions earlier this
month.
“Gain-of-function
research, as you know, is juicing up naturally occurring animal
viruses to infect humans. To arrive at the truth, the U.S. government
should admit that the Wuhan Virology Institute was experimenting to
enhance the coronavirus’s ability to infect humans,” Paul said.
Fauci
denied that the novel coronavirus was a potential byproduct of
funding from the NIAID or its parent organization, the National
Institutes of Health.
“With
all due respect, you are entirely, entirely and completely
incorrect,” Fauci told Paul. “The [National Institutes of Health]
has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the
Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
.@RandPaul:
"Dr. Fauci, do you still support…NIH funding of the lab in
Wuhan?"
Dr.
Anthony Fauci: "Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are
entirely and completely incorrect…"
In
later testimony before House lawmakers, Fauci admitted
that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was a recipient of a $600,000
grant from the National Institutes of Health to study bat
coronaviruses that could infect humans. Fauci has continued to
vehemently deny the money went toward gain-of-function research.
Fauci’s
denial is “surprising,” Wade wrote, given the evidence of
experiments “with enhancing coronaviruses and the language of the
moratorium statute defining gain of function as ‘any research that
improves the ability of a pathogen to cause disease.’” Fauci’s
denial, Wade explained, is likely a technical one based on the
definition of “gain of function.”
Last
weekend, Fauci, who has thrown cold water on the lab-leak theory
since the start of the pandemic, with corporate media following suit,
conceded he is “not convinced” the novel coronavirus, which
has killed nearly 3.5 million people worldwide, was an organic
disease.
Fauci’s
potential role in funding the birth of the pandemic while disputing
the claims to Congress has led several lawmakers to demand
the NIAID director’s resignation.
Tristan
Justice is the western correspondent for The Federalist. Follow him
on Twitter at @JusticeTristan
or contact him at Tristan@thefederalist.com.
Verifying
that it is in the Moderna COVID vaccine, I find a 12/30/20 CDC
document titled: “COVID-19 Vaccines: Update on Allergic Reactions,
Contraindications, and Precautions.” [1]
If
you scroll down halfway through the document, you’ll see a chart
titled, “Ingredients Included in mRNA COVID vaccines.” (pg 20)
The
right-hand side of the chart shows ingredients in the Moderna
vaccine. The fifth ingredient down is “SM-102: heptadecan-9-yl
8-((2-hydroxyethyl) (6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate.”
Now
we go to a document published by the Cayman Chemical Company of Ann
Arbor, Michigan: “Safety Data Sheet acc. to OSHA HCS.”
(04/11/2021) [2]
This
data sheet lists the effects of SM-102. Here is the opening note:
“For research use only, not for human or veterinary use.”
House
Republican Whip Steve Scalise and more than 200 of his GOP colleagues
have called for Nancy Pelosi to direct her Democrat-led committees to
investigate China's complicity in causing the COVID pandemic.
Dr
Anthony Fauci defended controversial 'gain of function' research and
said the benefits 'outweigh' the risks of a potential pandemic.
REVEALED:
Fauci defended 'gain of function' research that genetically modifies
pathogens in 2012 paper and said benefits 'outweigh' the risks of a
potential pandemic
Dr Anthony
Fauci defended
controversial 'gain of function' research and said the benefits
'outweigh' the risks of a potential pandemic.
In
a 2012 paper published in mBio,
the nation's top infectious disease expert discussed the research -
which involves altering an organism or a disease to increase its
development, transmissibility or range of hosts in can affect -
regarding the highly infectious H5N1 flu virus.
Fauci,
director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
(NIAID), wrote the voluntary moratorium on gain-of-function
research should be lifted due to the information that might be
learned from these experiments.
'In
an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist
becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and
ultimately triggers a pandemic?' he wrote at the time.
'Scientists
working in this field might say - as indeed I have said - that the
benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the
risks.'
It
comes as questions swirl over whether or not SARS-CoV-2, the virus
that causes COVID-19, was undergoing gain-of-function research at the
Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China, and whether the U.S.
funded such research.
There
have been recent questions surrounding whether or not the coronavirus
was being studied for 'gain of function' at the Wuhan Institute of
Virology. Pictured: A worker stands next to a cage with mice inside
the P4 laboratory at the WIV, February 2017
In
the paper, Fauci admitted there are concerns that a pandemic could be
caused by less experienced scientists not well trained in
gain-of-function research.
'Putting
aside the specter of bioterrorism for the moment, consider this
hypothetical scenario: an important gain-of-function experiment
involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed in a
well-regulated, world-class laboratory by experienced investigators,'
he wrote.
'But
the information from the experiment is then used by another scientist
who does not have the same training and facilities and is not subject
to the same regulation.'
Fauci
argued that it is more likely for pandemic to occur in nature, with a
virus that infects animals mutating and then spreading to humans.
China
claims that the virus originated in bats before it jumped to humans
via an 'intermediary animal.'
However,
there has been speculation the pathogen may have leaked from the
WIV after a report this week revealed three researchers from the lab
sought care for the illness, months before the virus spread to the
broader population.
Some
have speculated that scientists at the lab were performing
gain-of-function research when the virus escaped.
In
a Senate panel on Wednesday, Fauci defended allocating $600,000
to a group called EcoHealth Alliance, which then paid the WIV to
study the risk that bat coronaviruses could infect humans.
He
testified that scientists in Wuhan were not supposed to be doing gain
of function experiments and that he had seen the results of the
studies that had been conducted and none were of this variety.
But
Republican Senator John Kennedy suggested those at the Wuhan lab
could have used U.S. taxpayer money on secret experiments.
Fauci
admitted there is no way to know if 'gain of function' experiments on
bat coronaviruses were being performed using U.S. tax dollars.
'There's
no way of guaranteeing that,' he testified at a hearing before
the
Appropriations Committee.
'But
in our experience with grantees, including Chinese grantees, which we
have had interactions with for a very long period of time - they are
very competent, trustworthy scientists.'
On
Wednesday, the White House released a statement saying U.S.
intelligence agencies couldn't state for certain the origin of that
coronavirus.
The
Biden administration is now giving intelligence agencies 90 days to
dig in and come up with a report that has a more definitive answer.
EXCLUSIVE:
COVID-19 'has NO credible natural ancestor' and WAS created by
Chinese scientists who then tried to cover their tracks with
'retro-engineering' to make it seem like it naturally arose from
bats, explosive new study claims
An explosive new study claims
researchers found 'unique fingerprints' in COVID-19 samples that
they say could only have arisen from manipulation in a laboratory
DailyMail.com exclusively
obtained the new 22-page paper authored by British Professor Angus
Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen set to be
published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery
The study showed there's evidence
to suggest Chinese scientists created the virus while working on a Gain
of Function project in a Wuhan lab
Gain of Function research, which
was temporarily outlawed in the US, involves altering
naturally-occurring viruses to make them more infectious in order to
study their potential effects on humans
According to the paper, Chinese
scientists took a natural coronavirus 'backbone' found in Chinese cave
bats and spliced onto it a new 'spike', turning it into the deadly and
highly transmissible COVID-19
The researchers, who concluded
that COVID-19 'has no credible natural ancestor', also believe
scientists reverse-engineered versions of the virus to cover up their
tracks
'We think that there have been
retro-engineered viruses created,' Dalgleish told DailyMail.com.
'They've changed the virus, then tried to make out it was in a sequence
years ago.'
The study also points to
'deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data' in
Chinese labs and notes that 'scientists who wished to share their
findings haven't been able to do so or have disappeared'
Until recently, most experts had
staunchly denied the origins of the virus were anything other than a
natural infection leaping from animals to humans
Earlier this week, Dr. Anthony Fauci defended US
funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, saying the $600,000 grant
was not approved for Gain of Function research
An
explosive new study claims that Chinese scientists created COVID-19
in a Wuhan lab, then tried to cover their tracks by
reverse-engineering versions of the virus to make it look like it
evolved naturally from bats.
The
paper's authors, British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian
scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen, wrote that they have had 'prima facie
evidence of retro-engineering in China'
for a year - but were ignored by academics and major
journals.
Dalgleish
is a professor of oncology at St George's University, London,
and is best known for his breakthrough creating the first working
'HIV vaccine', to treat diagnosed patients and allow them to go off
medication for months.
Sørensen,
a virologist, is chair of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, which
developed a coronavirus
vaccine candidate called Biovacc-19. Dalgleish also has share options
in the firm.
The
shocking allegations in the study include accusations of 'deliberate
destruction, concealment or contamination of data' at Chinese labs,
and it notes the silencing and disappearance of scientists in the
communist country who spoke out.
The
journal article, exclusively obtained by DailyMail.com and slated for
publication in the coming days, is set to make waves among the
scientific community, as the majority of experts have until recently
staunchly denied the origins of COVID-19 were anything other than a
natural infection leaping from animals to humans.
The
paper's authors, Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen (left) and
British Professor Angus Dalgleish (right) said initial attempts to
publish their findings had been rejected by major scientific journals
While
analyzing COVID-19 samples last year in an attempt to create a
vaccine, Dalgleish and Sørensen discovered 'unique fingerprints' in
the virus that they say could only have arisen from manipulation in a
laboratory.
They
said they tried to publish their findings but were rejected by major
scientific journals which were at the time resolute that the virus
jumped naturally from bats or other animals to humans.
Even
when former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove spoke out publicly saying
the scientists' theory should be investigated, the idea was dismissed
as 'fake news.'
Over
a year later, leading academics, politicians and the media finally
flipped, and have begun to contemplate the possibility that COVID-19
escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China - a lab where
experiments included manipulating viruses to increase their
infectiousness in order to study their potential effects on
humans.
This
week, President Joe Biden ordered the intelligence community to
re-examine how the virus originated, including the lab accident
theory.
The
announcement followed the revelation that a previously undisclosed
intelligence report had been made to the White House, claiming that
several researchers at the Wuhan institute were hospitalized with
illness in November 2019. The document was uncovered this week by the
Wall Street Journal.
US
health officials have also come under fire for allegedly funding
researchers' controversial and risky experiments at the Wuhan lab.
A
'GenBank' table included in the paper lists various coronavirus
strains, with the dates they were collected and then when they were
submitted to the gene bank, showing a delay of several years for some
One
diagram of the coronavirus shows six 'fingerprints' identified by the
two scientists, which they say show the virus must have been made in
a lab
A
second diagram showed how a row of four amino acids found on the
SARS-Cov-2 spike have a positive charge that clings to human cells
like a magnet, making the virus extremely infectious
What
is Gain of Function research?
Gain
of Function Research (GOF) is a controversial practice that involves
altering a virus or pathogen in order to study the development of new
diseases and their transmission.
Scientists
conducting GOF research modify naturally occurring viruses to make
them more infectious so that they can replicate in human cells in a
lab.
This
allows the virus's potential effects on humans to be studied and
better understood. GOF has been considered controversial due to its
inherent biosafety risks.
In
2014, the Obama administration imposed a moratorium on GOF which
included halting funding for projects, however, this decision was
overturned three years later by the National Institute of Health
(NIH).
On
May 25, 2021, White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci
defended funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology through a $600,000
grant given to the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance, to study whether
bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to humans.
He
said the research was essential, pointing out that the SARS outbreak
in the early 2000s was eventually traced back to bats.
However,
Fauci claimed that under the terms of the funding, scientists were
not to use the money on Gain of Function research.
Now,
Dalgleish and Sørensen have authored a new study, which concludes
that 'SARS-Coronavirus-2 has no credible natural ancestor' and that
it is 'beyond reasonable doubt' that the virus was created through
'laboratory manipulation'.
In
the 22-page paper which is set to be published in the scientific
journal Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery, the scientists
describe their months-long 'forensic analysis', looking back at
experiments done at the Wuhan lab between 2002 and 2019.
Digging
through archives of journals and databases, Dalgleish and Sørensen
pieced together how Chinese scientists, some working in concert with
American universities, allegedly built the tools to create the
coronavirus.
Much
of the work was centered around controversial 'Gain of Function'
research – temporarily outlawed in the US under the Obama
administration.
Gain
of Function involves tweaking naturally occurring viruses to make
them more infectious, so that they can replicate in human cells in a
lab, allowing the virus's potential effect on humans to be studied
and better understood.
Dalgleish
and Sørensen claim that scientists working on Gain of Function
projects took a natural coronavirus 'backbone' found in Chinese cave
bats and spliced onto it a new 'spike', turning it into the deadly
and highly transmissible SARS-Cov-2.
One
tell-tale sign of alleged manipulation the two men highlighted was a
row of four amino acids they found on the SARS-Cov-2 spike.
In
an exclusive interview with DailyMail.com, Sørensen said the amino
acids all have a positive charge, which cause the virus to tightly
cling to the negatively charged parts of human cells like a magnet,
and so become more infectious.
But
because, like magnets, the positively charged amino acids repel each
other, it is rare to find even three in a row in naturally occurring
organisms, while four in a row is 'extremely unlikely,' the
scientist said.
'The
laws of physics mean that you cannot have four positively charged
amino acids in a row. The only way you can get this is if you
artificially manufacture it,' Dalgleish told DailyMail.com.
Their
new paper says these features of SARS-Cov-2 are 'unique fingerprints'
which are 'indicative of purposive manipulation', and that 'the
likelihood of it being the result of natural processes is very
small.'
'A
natural virus pandemic would be expected to mutate gradually and
become more infectious but less pathogenic which is what many
expected with the COVID-19 pandemic but which does not appear to have
happened,' the scientists wrote.
'The
implication of our historical reconstruction, we posit now beyond
reasonable doubt, of the purposively manipulated chimeric virus
SARS-CoV-2 makes it imperative to reconsider what types of Gain of
Function experiments it is morally acceptable to undertake.
'Because
of wide social impact, these decisions cannot be left to research
scientists alone.'
The
study concluded 'SARS-Coronavirus-2 has no credible natural ancestor'
and that it is 'beyond reasonable doubt' that the virus was created
through 'laboratory manipulation'
During
a Senate hearing on Wednesday, White House chief medical advisor Dr.
Anthony Fauci admitted he was not certain US funding for researchers
at the Wuhan lab was not spent on controversial and risky Gain of
Function experiments.
'How
do you know they didn't lie to you and use the money for gain of
function research anyway?' Louisiana Senator John Kennedy asked
Fauci.
'You
never know,' he replied, but added that scientists at the lab are
'trustworthy'.
National
Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis Collins told the hearing
that US-funded scientists at the lab 'were not approved by NIH for
doing gain of function research.'
In
another striking claim contained in the research paper, Dalgleish and
Sørensen say they have evidence that after the pandemic began,
Chinese scientists took samples of the COVID-19 virus and
'retro-engineered' it, making it appear as if it had evolved
naturally.
They
said they were suspicious of a raft of new strains suddenly entered
into gene databases by predominantly Chinese scientists early in
2020, years after they were recorded as being collected.
'We
think that there have been retro-engineered viruses created,'
Dalgleish told DailyMail.com. 'They've changed the virus, then tried
to make out it was in a sequence years ago.'
In
their paper, Dalgleish and Sørensen also pointed to 'deliberate
destruction, concealment or contamination of data' in Chinese labs
and noted that 'Chinese scientists who wished to share their
knowledge have not been able to do so or have disappeared.'
'It
appears that preserved virus material and related information have
been destroyed. Therefore we are confronted with large gaps in data
which may never be filled,' they wrote.
'Strains
'popped up' after January 2020 are not credible… For a year we have
possessed prima facie evidence of retro-engineering in China in early
2020.'
In
January last year DailyMail.com revealed that scientists had been
warning about the risk of deadly pathogens escaping from the Wuhan
lab since it was opened in 2017.
China
installed the first of a planned five to seven biolabs designed for
maximum safety in Wuhan in 2017, for the purpose of studying the most
high-risk pathogens, including the Ebola and the SARS viruses.
Tim
Trevan, a Maryland biosafety consultant, told the science journal
Nature that year, when the lab was on the cusp of opening, that he
worried that China's culture could make the institute unsafe because
'structures where everyone feels free to speak up and openness of
information are important.'
In
fact, the SARS virus had 'escaped' multiple times from a lab in
Beijing, according to the Nature article.
US
State Department officials visited the Wuhan institute in 2018 and
sent two official warnings back to DC alerting the government to poor
safety there, according to the Washington Post.
Wuhan
National Biosafety Laboratory, housed at the Wuhan Institute of
Virology, was China's first lab to be rated biosafety level 4, the
most secure classification.
But
Sørensen said that he believes the virus escaped from lower security
areas of the institute, where he believes Gain of Function research
was performed.
'We
have seen lab leaks and we know it's happening. We also know from the
reports we've seen, that coronavirus is worked on in Biosafety
Level 2 or 3 labs. If they do Gain of Function in such labs, what do
you expect?' he said.
In
February 2020 a molecular biomechanics researcher at South China
University of Technology, Botao Xiao, published a paper claiming 'the
killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan,'
highlighting safety issues at the institute.
Conflicting
studies on the origins of COVID-19
Dalgleish
and Sorensen's explosive claims have been a matter of controversy
since they first put forward their hypothesis last summer, and the
scientific community is still split over the likely origins of the
virus.
27 scientists published a statement
in The Lancet on February 19 last year saying they 'strongly condemn
conspiracy theories suggesting that covid-19 does not have a natural
origin' and asserted that experts 'overwhelmingly conclude that this
coronavirus originated in wildlife' – though three authors later
backtracked
A group of prominent scientists
wrote in leading journal Nature on March 17, 2020 that 'the evidence
shows that SARSCoV-2 is not a purposefully manipulated virus,' and that
'we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is
plausible'
In an unorthodox move, the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence issued a public statement on April 30 last year that 'The
Intelligence Community also concurs with the wide scientific consensus
that the COVID-19 virus was not manmade or genetically modified'
But
dissenting voices have started to appear, pointing to evidence that
COVID-19 in fact originated from a Wuhan lab:
In November last year, a paper by
bioengineer Rossana Segreto and geneticist Yuri Deigin conceded that
'the genetic structure of SARS-CoV-2 does not rule out a laboratory
origin' and noted features of the virus that 'might be the result of
lab manipulation techniques such as site-directed mutagenesis'
The same month, David Relman, a
Stanford University microbiologist who has worked on biosecurity
initiatives for the government, wrote a journal article for the
National Academy of Scientists that the 'origin story' for covid-19 is
'missing many key details', including a plausible history of the virus
and explanation of how the first human got infected
Earlier this month, 18 prominent scientists published a
letter in the top journal Science, calling for a new investigation into
the origins of the virus, adding that 'theories of accidental release
from a lab and zoonotic spillover both remain viable'
How
Dalgleish and Sørensen's explosive claims were ignored by academics
and major journals for a year
Dalgleish
and Sørensen's explosive claims have been highly controversial since
they first put forward their hypothesis of a man-made virus last
summer.
In
June 2020, after Dalgleish and Sørensen's theory was championed by a
former MI6 chief, the Times of London quoted MI5 sources dismissing
the theory as 'fake news.'
Gunnveig
Grødeland, a vaccine researcher at the University of Oslo, told
Forbes in June last year that the parts of the virus that Dalgleish
and Sorensen believe must be man-made, in fact appear in nature.
'Examples
can be found in other viruses including subtypes of influenza
(including 'bird flu'), HIV, and several human coronaviruses (MERS,
OC43, HKU1),' she said.
Dr
Rachael Tarlinton, an associate professor of veterinary virology at
the UK University of Nottingham, told Sky News that Dalgleish and
Sorensen's theory was 'magical thinking' in a July 2020 interview.
'The
artificial release theories seem to be a form of 'magical thinking' -
a simplistic solution to a complex problem where if someone can be
blamed then that someone can be removed and the problem go away,' she
said.
One
of the two scientists' biggest critics was Professor Kristian
Andersen at the department of immunology and microbiology at Scripps
research facility in California, who described Dalgleish and
Sorensen's first paper last summer as 'complete nonsense,
unintelligible, and not even remotely scientific.'
Months
earlier, a statement published in the Lancet by a group of 27
scientists said: 'We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy
theories suggesting that covid-19 does not have a natural origin.'
The
statement, released February 19, 2020, added that scientists
'overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in
wildlife.'
Three
of the authors later backtracked, saying they thought a lab accident
was plausible.
A
paper by a group of prominent scientists was published in the leading
journal Nature on March 17, 2020, co-authored by Professor Andersen,
concluding that 'the evidence shows that SARSCoV-2 is not a
purposefully manipulated virus,' and that 'we do not believe that any
type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.'
The
scientists added that it was 'currently impossible to prove or
disprove the other theories of its origin.'
In
their new paper, Dalgleish and Sorensen criticized Andersen and his
colleagues' conclusions, saying some of the studies the opposing
scientists used to back up their claims in fact contradict their own
arguments.
A
week before the Nature paper was published, Chinese scientist Shi
Zhengli, who led a bat coronavirus research group at the Wuhan
institute, told Scientific American that she checked the records for
mishandling of experimental materials, and said none of the viruses
her team sampled from bat caves were among them.
The
Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a statement on
April 30 last year saying: 'The Intelligence Community also concurs
with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not
manmade or genetically modified.'
The
director said the intelligence community would 'rigorously examine'
whether the virus escaped from the Wuhan lab or whether the first
infection arose through contact with infected animals.
Xiao
withdrew the paper weeks later after Chinese authorities denied any
accidents at the lab.
The
same month, a group of 27 scientists wrote a statement in top journal
The Lancet, saying they 'strongly condemn conspiracy theories
suggesting that covid-19 does not have a natural origin' and
'overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in
wildlife.'
Three
of the authors later told the Wall Street Journal that they now
believe a lab accident is worth consideration as an explanation for
the origins of covid-19.
Dalgleish
told DailyMail.com that he believed resistance to the theory that
COVID-19 is a man-made, escaped virus comes from scientists fearful
that the revelation would shut down their field.
'This
looks like a weak defense to protect the discipline so that this type
of genetic engineering will not be interfered with,' he said. 'I make
no bones about it. The Gain of Function engineering should have been
banned ages ago.'
Questioned
at a congressional hearing this week, White House chief medical
adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci denied that any US funding went towards
Gain of Function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Fauci
told lawmakers that the National Institutes of Health committed
$600,000 to the Chinese lab through the non-profit EcoHealth
Alliance, to study whether bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to
humans.
NIH
Director Dr. Francis Collins also told the hearing that US-funded
scientists at the lab 'were not approved by NIH for doing gain of
function research'.
'We
are, of course, not aware of other sources of funds or other
activities they might have undertaken outside of what our approved
grant allowed,' he added.
The
NIH ceased its funding to the EcoHealth Alliance in April 2020.
Daily
Mail has been asking if the virus stemmed from a Wuhan lab since
April 2020
The
Daily Mail has consistently questioned the consensus that COVID-19
was transmitted from humans to animals.
Our
reporters have dug into the details and challenged the assumptions
about how the pandemic originated.
Ministers
fear that the coronavirus pandemic might have been caused by a leak
from a Chinese laboratory, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
Senior
Government sources say that while 'the balance of scientific advice'
is still that the deadly virus was first transmitted to humans from a
live animal market in Wuhan, a leak from a laboratory in the Chinese
city is 'no longer being discounted'.
One
member of Cobra, the emergency committee led by Boris Johnson, said
last night that while the latest intelligence did not dispute the
virus was 'zoonotic' – originating in animals – it did not rule
out that the virus first spread to humans after leaking from a Wuhan
laboratory.
Secretary
of State Mike Pompeo has demanded that China 'come clean' following
reports that coronavirus originated in a Chinese laboratory, not as a
bioweapon, but as part of bungling experiments to prove that Chinese
scientists were superior to Americans in identifying emerging virus
threats.
It
comes after President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the U.S. is
trying to determine whether the coronavirus first crossed to humans
accidentally during experiments with bats at the Wuhan Institute of
Virology Lab.
After
word of the outbreak finally became public, Chinese leaders were
quick to blame Wuhan's 'wet market' where wild animals -- though not
bats -- are sold for consumption, leading one source to tell Fox News
the debacle is the 'costliest government coverup of all time.'
Pictures
which appear to show slack safety standards at the Chinese laboratory
at the centre of international suspicion over Covid-19
have been systematically deleted from its website – as Donald
Trump
continues to ramp up the pressure on Beijing over its potential role
in the outbreak.
During
the past month, Wuhan's Institute of Virology has removed photographs
of scientists working in its laboratories and edited out references
to visits by US diplomats who subsequently raised the alarm about the
laboratory's work on bats.
US
President Donald Trump announced on Thursday that he had seen
intelligence that gave him a 'high degree of confidence' that the
global crisis had its origins in the institute – a month after The
Mail on Sunday first revealed that British Cabinet Ministers had
received classified briefings raising the possibility of a leak from
the institute.
Downing
Street
did not take issue with President Trump's remarks. 'There are clearly
questions that need to be answered about the origin and spread of the
virus,' a spokesman for Boris
Johnson said.
China
has become used to public confessions on television. But this time
the words came from one of the nation's top officials and had seismic
global implications.
'At
first, we assumed the seafood market might have the virus, but now
the market is more like a victim,' said Gao Fu, director of the
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.
Gao's
initial analysis had made sense after previous outbreaks of zoonotic
viruses (diseases that jump from animals to humans). Yet suspicion
grew over the Chinese government's failure to share data from animals
sampled in the market following its early cover-ups.
One
of America's most senior government officials says the most
'credible' theory about the origin of coronavirus
is that it escaped from a laboratory in China.
Matthew
Pottinger, who is President Donald
Trump's
respected Deputy National Security Adviser, told politicians from
around the world that even China's leaders now openly admit their
previous claims that the virus originated in a Wuhan market are
false.
Mr
Pottinger said that the latest intelligence points to the virus
leaking from the top-secret Wuhan Institute of Virology, 11 miles
from the market, saying: 'There is a growing body of evidence that
the lab is likely the most credible source of the virus.'
The
Chinese government is facing fresh accusations of a cover-up after
officials deleted crucial online data about the laboratory suspected
of being the source of Covid-19.
The
Mail on Sunday can reveal that hundreds of pages of information
relating to studies carried out by the top-secret Wuhan Institute of
Virology have been wiped.
Details
of more than 300 studies, including many investigating diseases that
pass from animals to humans, published online by the state-run
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) are no longer
available.
Scientists
studying bat diseases at China's
maximum-security laboratory in Wuhan were engaged in a massive
project to investigate animal viruses alongside leading military
officials – despite their denials of any such links.
Documents
obtained by The
Mail on Sunday
reveal that a nationwide scheme, directed by a leading state body,
was launched nine years ago to discover new viruses and detect the
'dark matter' of biology involved in spreading diseases.
America’s
top Covid-19 medical adviser argued the benefits of experimenting on
contagious viruses was worth the risk of a lab accident sparking a
pandemic.
By
SHARRI MARKSON May
29, 2021
Report:
Fauci Kept Trump in the Dark, Argued for Experiments That Can Create
Pandemics
“It’s
a nasty virus if you’re a mouse,” said Emory University
virologist John Steel in a November 2014 interview with Science
Magazine.
Steel
was referring to PRS, a strain of influenza that he and his team
had been studying until an order from the National Institutes of
Health interrupted their work.
Concerned
that gain-of-function
research, the process of altering a pathogen to make it more
lethal and more easily transmissible in order to develop vaccines and
other remedies to eradicate it, was too risky, the NIH placed a
moratorium on the practice in October 2014. Federal funding would no
longer be available for research “involv[ing] tweaking influenza,
MERS, and SARS viruses.”
In
December 2017, the NIH announced they were lifting the Obama-era ban
on the use of federal funds for gain-of-function research. The
organization issued a statement
that stated: “GOF research is important in helping us identify,
understand, and develop strategies and effective countermeasures
against rapidly evolving pathogens that pose a threat to public
health.”
Investigative
reporter Sharri Markson, the author of a forthcoming book entitled,
“What Really Happened In Wuhan,” has been following the COVID
story closely.
She
reports that Dr. Anthony
Fauci, the director of the National Institutes of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID), failed to notify the appropriate Trump
Administration officials of this development. Markson wrote: “An
investigation by The
Weekend Australian has also confirmed Dr Fauci … did not alert
senior White House officials before lifting the ban on
gain-of-function research in 2017.”
China’s
leaders must marvel “how in western liberal democracies a disease
that attacks our respiratory system can do so much damage to rational
thought as well, and how hatred for a political opponent can triumph
over concerns for the lives of others.” 🔥https://t.co/ECVpXbpKil
The
Weekend Australian spoke to “multiple” Trump administration
insiders who confirmed that Fauci had not briefed them on the NIH
decision to restore funding for gain-of-function research.
“It
kind of just got rammed through,” one official told the
publication. “I think there’s truth in the narrative that
the (National Security Council) staff, the president, the White House
chief-of-staff, those people were in the dark that he was switching
back on the research.”
According
to the report, the paper “also confirmed that neither Mike Pompeo,
the then-director of the Central Intelligence Agency, nor National
Security Council member Matthew Pottinger, was briefed.”
Markson
also discovered a paper Fauci had published in the American Society
for Microbiology in October 2012 in which he expressed his support
for gain-of-function research. He considered that the benefits
exceeded the risk of a pandemic.
Fauci
wrote, “In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that
scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak
and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions:
given the possibility of such a scenario — however remote —
should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published
in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this
decision?
“Scientists
working in this field might say — as indeed I have said — that
the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh
the risks,” Fauci said.
Fauci
wrote, “In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that
scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak
and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions:
given the possibility of such a scenario — however remote —
should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published
in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this
decision?
“Scientists
working in this field might say — as indeed I have said — that
the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh
the risks,” Fauci said.
“We
cannot expect those who have these concerns to simply take us, the
scientific community, at our word that the benefits of this work
outweigh the risks, nor can we ignore their calls for greater
transparency, their concerns about conflicts of interest, and their
efforts to engage in a dialog about whether these experiments should
have been performed in the first place.”
“Those
of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this
work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully
and respectfully,” he added.
Up
until two weeks ago, Fauci has insisted that COVID had a natural
origin, that it jumped from an animal to a human. He now admits that
it may have escaped from a lab.
During
a Senate Health Committee hearing held in early May, Republican
Sen.
Rand Paul of Kentucky asked Fauci if NIAID funded
gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which
Fauci categorically denied.
“Yet
papers published as late as last year in American peer-reviewed
academic journals that include WIV researchers – including its
prominent virologist Shi Zhengli – disclose that work on
coronaviruses had been funded by at least three NIH grants,”
according to the report in the Australian.
The
NIH did provide a grant (or a series of grants) to a nonprofit
called EcoHealth
Alliance which was connected to the WIV. EcoHealth, in turn,
provided funding to the WIV.
The
video immediately went viral, which quickly drew intense media
attention to both Fauci himself and the question of whether or not
the U.S. funded gain-of-function research at the WIV.
Last
week, The
Wall Street Journal reported on a State Department document which
revealed that three researchers from the Wuhan lab had fallen ill in
November 2019 and were hospitalized “with symptoms consistent
with both Covid-19 and common seasonal illness.”
The
document
had been issued by then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Jan. 15.
There were two other interesting pieces of information in the
document.
The
first item concerned “WIV Research on ‘RaTG13’ and ‘gain of
function’: Starting in at least 2016, WIV researchers studied
RaTG13, the bat coronavirus identified by the WIV in January 2020 as
its closest sample to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). Since the outbreak,
the WIV has not been transparent nor consistent about its work with
RaTG13 or other similar viruses, including possible ‘gain of
function’ experiments to enhance transmissibility or lethality.
And
the second involved WIV’s “secret links” to Military
Research: “Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian
institution, the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret
projects with China’s military. The WIV has engaged in classified
research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the
Chinese military since at least 2017.”
According
to a new study, the COVID-19 virus was created in a lab, released
into the wild, and then reverse-engineered by Wuhan scientists to
make it appear as if it came from bats.
Regarding
his rumored run for Texas governor, the Academy Award winner said he
does not want to place a bunch of Band-Aids on a problem.“I’m not
interested in going and putting a bunch of Band-Aids on that are
gonna be ripped off as soon as I’m out,” he said. “I’m
interested in building something that can last, and I’m
measuring
what category that is. I don’t know if that’s politics.”
The open letter’s lead signatory is retired consultant
Paediatrician, Dr Ros Jones of the Health Advisory & Recovery Team
(HART). HART is a group of doctors, scientists and medical
professionals which was formed to research and review Covid-19 policy
in the UK in an attempt to best help politicians evaluate the available
evidence and respond to the developing situation.
In the letter to the MHRA chief executive Dr June Raine the
HART group highlights all the reasons why they have grave concerns
regarding the administration of the Covid-19 vaccine to children, and
conclude that it is “irresponsible, unethical and indeed, unnecessary,
to include children under 18 years in the national COVID-19 vaccine
rollout”.
At this point an estimated 12.7 million first doses of the
Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 24.2 million doses of the Oxford
University/AstraZeneca vaccine, had been administered. As well as
around 10.5 million second doses of the Pfizer jab, and 10.7 million
second doses of the AstraZeneca jab. There had also been around 0.3
million first doses of the Moderna vaccine administered as of the 19th
May.
As of the same date the MHRA had received 175,673 reports of
adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab, and 676,083 reports of adverse
reactions to the AstraZeneca jab, bringing the total number of adverse
reactions to both jabs to an eye watering total of 851,756. However the
MHRA states that only 1% – 10% of adverse reactions are actually
reported to the Yellow Card scheme.
The adverse reactions include 12,028 blood disorders, 9,198
cardiac disorders, 9,110 ear disorders, 13,396 eye disorders, and an
astounding 178,401 nervous system disorders.
The JVCI say they came to the conclusion that pregnant women
should be offered the Covid vaccines because “in the USA, around 90,000
pregnant women have been vaccinated mainly with Pfizer and Moderna
vaccines and no safety concerns have been identified“. But is this
statement true?
The latest data within the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System (VAERS) in the USA shows us that 395 women have reported the
loss of their unborn child due to the Covid vaccines. Out of 90,000
this may not sound like many, but it’s important to remember that only
1% – 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the VAERS
system, and there is a serious backlog due to the vast amount of
adverse reactions that have been reported to the Covid vaccines.
Explosive
study claims to prove Chinese scientists created COVID
British
Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen
wrote they’ve had primary evidence 'of retro-engineering in China'
A
bombshell new study claims to have proof that Chinese scientists
created COVID-19
in a lab and then tried to reverse-engineer versions of the virus to
make it look like it evolved naturally from bats.
British
Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen
wrote they’ve had primary evidence "of retro-engineering in
China" since last year, but were ignored by academics and major
medical journals, The
Daily Mail reported Saturday,
citing the soon-to-be-published study.
The
study concludes: "the likelihood of it being the result of
natural processes is very small." The virus is still killing
12,000 people a day around the world.
Dalgleish
is a London oncology professor known for breakthrough work on a
vaccine for HIV. Sørensen is a virologist and chair of the
pharmaceutical company Immunor, which developed a coronavirus vaccine
candidate called Biovacc-19. Dalgleish also has a financial stake in
that company.
It
was during their COVID-19 vaccine research that the pair came across
"unique fingerprints" indicating the virus didn’t come
from nature, they said. The telltale clue: a rare finding in
the COVID-carrying virus of a row of four amino acids, which give off
a positive charge and bond to negative human cells.
"The
laws of physics mean that you cannot have four positively charged
amino acids in a row," Dalgleish told the Daily Mail. "The
only way you can get this is if you artificially manufacture it."
They
also tracked published Chinese research, some done working with
American universities, to show how the tools to create the virus were
allegedly built. A good part of the work reviewed involved "gain
of function" research, which involves manipulating natural
viruses in a lab to make them more infectious, allowing scientists to
study their potential effect on humans.
The
U.S. put a moratorium on such research in 2014. But it’s impossible
to know if $600,000 funding for medical research in China was used
for gain of function research, Dr.
Anthony Fauci told Congress
last week.
"A
natural virus pandemic would be expected to mutate gradually and
become more infectious but less pathogenic which is what many
expected with the COVID-19 pandemic but which does not appear to have
happened," the scientists wrote.
Avi
Yemini went to cover the lockdown protest in Melbourne today for
Rebel News. As he arrived, police surrounded him for allegedly "not
being a Victoria Police accredited journalist". Seriously!
Fauci
wrote in a paper reported
on by The Australian. “In an unlikely but conceivable turn of
events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which
leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?”
“Scientists working in this field might say — as indeed I have
said — that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting
knowledge outweigh the risks.”
Most
people are unaware that many newly licensed vaccines are in phase 4
clinical trials when they become publicly available. In the case of
the new COVID vaccines, which have not yet been licensed, consumers
are unknowing subjects in a massive clinical trial.
The
complete safety profile of a vaccine is unknown at the time of
widespread use. The safety profile becomes more clear only after
injuries and deaths related to the vaccine are reported. The safety
profile of COVID vaccines, for instance, is still evolving as
injuries and deaths accumulate.
It
is thus crucially important that consumers and medical professionals
report adverse events related to vaccines. According to studies,
however, they report only about 1%.
With
the SARS-CoV-2 virus causing almost 3 million deaths worldwide,
researchers have been scrambling to learn more about the deadly
COVID-19 disease that has threatened global public health and world
economies.
A
new study, published on preprint server bioRxiv last week, suggests
that a cannabis plant compound inhibited infection with SARS-CoV-2 in
human lung cells.
According
to the researchers at the University of Chicago in Illinois,
cannabidiol (CBD), a chemical in the Cannabis sativa plant, also
known as marijuana, and its metabolite 7-OH-CBD, blocked SARS-CoV-22
replication in lung epithelial cells. Epithelial cells are cells that
come from body surfaces, such as the skin, blood vessels, urinary
tract or organs.
If
you scroll down halfway through the document, you’ll see a chart
titled, “Ingredients Included in mRNA COVID vaccines.” (pg 20)
The
right-hand side of the chart shows ingredients in the Moderna
vaccine. The fifth ingredient down is “SM-102: heptadecan-9-yl
8-((2-hydroxyethyl) (6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate.”
Now
we go to a document published by the Cayman Chemical Company of Ann
Arbor, Michigan: “Safety Data Sheet acc. to OSHA HCS.”
(04/11/2021) [2]
This
data sheet lists the effects of SM-102. Here is the opening note:
“For research use only, not for human or veterinary use.”
An
explosive new study claims that Chinese scientists created COVID-19
in a Wuhan lab, then tried to cover their tracks by
reverse-engineering versions of the virus to make it look like it
evolved naturally from bats.
The
paper's authors, British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian
scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen, wrote that they have had 'prima facie
evidence of retro-engineering in China' for a year - but were ignored
by academics and major journals.
Dalgleish
is a professor of oncology at St George's University, London, and is
best known for his breakthrough creating the first working 'HIV
vaccine', to treat diagnosed patients and allow them to go off
medication for months.
US
companies that have been producing masks and protective equipment
during the coronavirus pandemic are in danger of going out of
business following a severe drop in sales caused by Chinese imports.
By:
mayaleo
Col. Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. shared in a tweet this
morning the origin of COVID-19 and its connections to the PLA
Bio-Warfare Department and the CCP Civil-Military Fusion Program.
Former
FDA Commissioner - There’s One Piece Of Evidence Needed To
Determine Pandemic’s Origin
Former
FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb told CBS News on Sunday that China
likely knows where the coronavirus pandemic originated from based on
some of the evidence that they have.
Gottlieb’s
comments come as the narrative in the legacy media has shifted in
recent weeks toward considering the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 might
have escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.When asked if he
believes that the Chinese know the answer about the pandemic’s
origins, Gottlieb responded, “They would know the answer to the
question because they would have blood samples from the workers in
that lab.”
“And
that’s the evidence that they haven’t made public,” Gottlieb
continued. “If, in fact, the blood samples show that a high
prevalence of people in that lab have been exposed to this virus,
that’s pretty definitive proof that this coursed through that lab.
And they would also have the samples from the time that they were
first drawn, which was the time when they had those illnesses.
There’s no question that when they had an outbreak of an illness in
that lab that they would have done routine blood sampling in that
lab. That’s just normal controls in a lab of that quality. So they
would have that information”
Other
newsworthy quotes that Gottlieb made during the interview:
“The ledger that suggests that this
could have come out of a lab has continued to expand.”
“And the side of the ledger that
suggests that this could have come from a zoonotic source, come out of
nature, really hasn’t budged, and if anything, you can argue that that
side of the ledger has contracted because we’ve done an exhaustive
search for the so-called intermediate host, the animal that could have
been host to this virus before it spread to humans. We have not found
such an animal. We’ve also fully disproven the market, the food market
that was initially implicated in the original outbreak as the source of
the outbreak. And so that side of the ledger probably has shrunken, and
China could provide evidence that would be exculpatory here. They could
provide the blood samples from those who worked in the lab in Wuhan.
They’ve refused to do that. They could provide the source strain, some
of the original strains. They’ve refused to do that. They [could]
provide access to some of the early samples that we could sequence.
They could provide an inventory of what was in the lab, the Wuhan
Institute of Virology, the lab that has been implicated in a potential
lab leak. They have refused to do that.”
“These kinds of lab leaks happen all
the time, actually.”
“In China, the last six known
outbreaks of SARS-1 have been out of labs, including the last known
outbreak, which was a pretty extensive outbreak that China initially
wouldn’t disclose that it came out of lab. … it was only disclosed
finally by some journalists who were able to trace that outbreak back
to a laboratory.”
TRANSCRIPT
PROVIDED VIA CBS NEWS:
JOHN
DICKERSON: We go now to former FDA commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb,
who sits on the board of Pfizer and joins us from Westport,
Connecticut. He has just finished work on a book that will be out
this fall titled: “Uncontrolled Spread: Why COVID-19 Crushed US and
How We Can Defeat the Next Pandemic.” Good morning, Dr. Gottlieb.
DOCTOR
SCOTT GOTTLIEB: Good morning.
JOHN
DICKERSON: So usually when we’re together, we talk about the past
and look towards the future, but this week, we’ve been talking a
lot about the past. Why is it that there is now a conversation about
how this pandemic started, and why is that important?
DR.
GOTTLIEB: Well, look, I think the challenge is that the side of the
ledger that suggests that this could have come out of a lab has
continued to expand. And the side of the ledger that suggests that
this could have come from a zoonotic source, come out of nature,
really hasn’t budged. And if anything, you can argue that that side
of the ledger has contracted because we’ve done an exhaustive
search for the so-called intermediate host, the animal that could
have been host to this virus before it spread to humans. We have not
found such an animal. We’ve also fully disproven the market, the
food market that was initially implicated in the original outbreak as
the source of the outbreak. And so that side of the ledger probably
has shrunken, and China could provide evidence that would be
exculpatory here. They could provide the blood samples from those who
worked in the lab in Wuhan. They’ve refused to do that. They could
provide the source strain, some of the original strains. They’ve
refused to do that. They [could] provide access to some of the early
samples that we could sequence. They could provide an inventory of
what was in the lab, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the lab that
has been implicated in a potential lab leak. They have refused to do
that. And we know that that lab was poorly constructed, had poor
controls. That was reported at the time that it was first opened. We
know the lab was engaging in very high-risk research, including
infecting transgenic animals, animals with fully human immune
systems. We know they were working with SARS-like viruses that have
never been disclosed before. And now we have new evidence that some
lab workers became infected right at the time that this virus was
believed to be first introduced. That’s been publicly reported. So
that side of the ledger has expanded. And I think that’s why there
is renewed focus on this. In terms of your final question, why this
is important, I think if we assess that there is a probability or a
possibility that this came out of a lab, it’s going to affect how
we respond to this. We’re going to need to focus on trying to get
better controls in this sort of high-risk research going forward and
get better controls over these BSL-4, these high security labs that
conduct this research. Incidentally, China was not conducting this
research in a BSL-4 lab. They were doing it in a lower security BSL-2
lab.
JOHN
DICKERSON: So in terms of looking at this going forward, back to the
title of your book, “How We Can Defeat the Next Pandemic,” your
argument is it’s important to know how this started in this case
because there is this specific lab. But there have been also other
cases where security has been lax and there have been leaks. And so
it’s important to figure out what happened here in order to kind of
lock the doors tight, to keep it from happening again.
DR.
GOTTLIEB: That’s right. These kinds of lab leaks happen all the
time, actually. Even here in the United States, we’ve had mishaps.
And in China, the last six known outbreaks of SARS-1 have been out of
labs, including the last known outbreak, which was a pretty extensive
outbreak that China initially wouldn’t disclose that it came out of
lab. It was only for — it was only disclosed finally by some
journalists who were able to trace that outbreak back to a
laboratory. So it’s important to understand what the possibility is
that this came out of a lab so we could focus more international
attention on trying to get better inventories around these labs, what
they’re doing, better security, make sure they’re properly built.
We need to also look at public health through the lens of national
security. This was an asymmetric harm to the United States. COVID
hurt the U.S. a lot more than it hurt many other countries. And
that’s another thing I talk about in the book, looking at these
kinds of risks through the lens of national security, including
getting our intelligence services more engaged in this mission.
Traditionally, we’ve relied on international conventions and
scientists working together, multilateral agreements to try to assess
the risks and try to uncover these kinds of outbreaks. I think we
also need to get better surveillance in place and use our tools of
national security to help engage in that mission as well.
JOHN
DICKERSON: If there were an answer to this question, would it help
with any way in which we are covering and responding to the
coronavirus now? In other words, dealing with variants or anything,
is there a public health benefit to knowing this at this moment?
DR.
GOTTLIEB: Not right now. I think what we know about the virus, we
already know about the virus. And there’s nothing that we’re
going to learn about the characteristics of the current virus by
knowing its origin. Quite frankly, we’ve had enough experience with
this virus to fully understand it. I think it informs how we go
forward, and how we prepare ourselves against these threats in the
future, and reduce these likelihoods. That’s where this becomes
very important.
JOHN
DICKERSON: And what about in the past? There was discussion of this
very early in the response to the pandemic. People thought this might
be one of the places it might have come from. If we had known for
certain, which, it’s an open question whether we ever could have
known. But if in the early days of the pandemic, we had known that it
came from this lab, would that have changed in any way the response
to the pandemic?
DR.
GOTTLIEB: I’m not sure it would have affected how we responded to
it. Once this became epidemic in China and once it escaped China, it
was going to behave the way it behaved. I’m not sure there’s
things we would have learned or gleaned by knowing that it came out
of a lab and perhaps was manipulated or humanized in a lab. We could
ascertain that this was pretty humanized by the time it started to
spread in humans. Again, I think this is more of a question going
forward. And we may never really determine with precision whether or
not this came out of a lab. I think what we’re likely to end up
with is an assessment, a probability, unless we get very lucky and we
either find the intermediate host, we find a colony of civet cats or
pangolins where this is epidemic and it could have first spilled over
into humans, or we have a whistleblower in China or regime change,
which we’re not going to have. I don’t know that we’re going to
find out with certainty that this came out of a lab. I think we’re
going to ultimately come up with an assessment and a probability on
whether this came out of a lab versus a zoonotic source. And it’s
going to take some more data to get a better overall assessment in
terms of the probability that this could have come out of a lab. But
we might get that information.
JOHN
DICKERSON: Is it your view that the Chinese know the answer to this
question?
DR.
GOTTLEIB: They would know the answer to the question because they
would have blood samples from the workers in that lab. And that’s
the evidence that they haven’t made public. If, in fact, the blood
samples show that a high prevalence of people in that lab have been
exposed to this virus, that’s pretty definitive proof that this
coursed through that lab. And they would also have the samples from
the time that they were first drawn, which was the time when they had
those illnesses. There’s no question that when they had an outbreak
of an illness in that lab that they would have done routine blood
sampling in that lab. That’s just normal controls in a lab of that
quality. So they would have that information.
JOHN
DICKERSON: All right, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, congratulations on
finishing the book. Thanks again for being with us, as always.
The
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has begun an
investigation into reports of myocarditis (heart inflammation) in
people between 16 and 45 years of age after receiving either the
genetically engineered experimental messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)
BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 biologics for COVID-19 developed by
Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna/National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID) respectively. The cases involve primarily
males and they typically occur within four days of getting the second
dose of the shots.1 2 3 4
About
125 cases of myocarditis following vaccination have been reported to
the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since
January 2021, but public health officials say the relationship
between the heart condition and the shots is unclear. At least 17 of
the cases reportedly involve members of the U.S. military.4
SYMPTOMS
OF MYOCARDITIS SIMILAR TO HEART ATTACK
That
"... piece of genetic material" is experimental MRNA gene
therapy, and that is why we have no understanding of what it will do
in the human body, or what type of damage it will be capable of
inflicting in the humans who got the jab with it, down the road.
Ebony
James’s 20-year-old son sometimes sits in his car for hours after
he parks inside the family’s garage. Her eight-year-old stopped
sleeping in his own bed after his dad no longer sat with him reading
the Bible until he fell asleep. Her 16-year-old daughter “completely
shut down and just didn’t talk at all”.
The
lawsuit claims Houston Methodist “is forcing its employees to be
human ‘guinea pigs’ as a condition for continued employment."
HOUSTON
— 117 employees have joined a lawsuit against Houston Methodist
over its requirement that all employees receive a COVID-19 vaccine as
a condition of employment.
According
to Houston Methodist policy, employees have until June 7 to get
vaccinated or risk losing their jobs.
The
lawsuit claims Houston Methodist “is forcing its employees to be
human ‘guinea pigs’ as a condition for continued employment,”
calling the vaccine “experimental,” since it was granted
emergency use authorization but has not received FDA approval.
Jennifer
Bridges, a registered nurse who has worked for Houston Methodist for
more than six years, spoke with KHOU 11 last month and said she
planned to sue the hospital. Bridges said then she just isn’t ready
to receive the vaccine and told KHOU 11 she wants more time so the
FDA can gather more data and research.
It
will be interesting how this lawsuit proceeds, because it will
provide precedent, for turning American workers into unwilling lab
rats, as a condition of employment, if the suit is overturned.
And
I, for one, bristle at this, even if Mike and I DID take the J &
J jab, to enable us to visit my Mom, who lives in an assisted living
facility closeby.
IF
THE SHIT'S GOOD FOR YOU WHY WOULDN'T EVERYONE BE CLIMBING OVER ONE
ANOTHER TO GET IT?
Johnson
& Johnson asks Supreme Court to throw out $2 billion verdict in
case that claimed the company's talc-based baby powder caused women's
ovarian cancer
Johnson & Johnson is
asking the U.S. Supreme Court to throw out a $2 billion verdict in
favor of women who claim the company's baby powder played a role in
them developing cancer.
The 22 women who filed
a lawsuit against J&J were initially awarded $4.7 billion in
2018 in a state court in Missouri. They alleged that the
talcum-based baby powder led to ovarian cancer.
A
state appeals courts slashed $2.7 billion off the payment, but J&J
hopes the rest will be thrown out as well.
Johnson
and Johnson claims that the way the lawsuit was structured was unfair
to the company, as attorneys had to argue multiple situations in one
suit.
The
company has since stopped selling their talcum-based powder
in North America, now only selling the
cornstarch-based version.
Talc
is a mineral similar in structure to asbestos, which is known to
cause cancer, and they are sometimes obtained from the same mines.
Last
year, a U.S.-led analysis of more than 250,000 women found no strong
link between talc and ovarian cancer.
The
study's lead author called the results 'ambiguous' though, saying
there are no conclusive results to be drawn from the analysis.
The
cosmetics industry in 1976 agreed to make sure its talc products do
not contain detectable amounts of asbestos.
Talc
has also been linked to mesothelioma, with Vanderbilt Minerals paying
out a settlement for their use of the chemical to a tile worker who
developed cancer after working for the company in 2018.
Last
year J&J recalled 33,000 bottles of its baby powder after the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration found traces of asbestos in bottles
purchased online.
A
2018 investigation by Reuters found
that the company had known its baby powder contained the chemical for
decades, with the earliest record being from the 1950s.
J&J
denies that its talc products cause cancer and it called the verdict
in the Missouri trial 'at odds with decades of independent scientific
evaluations confirming Johnson's Baby Powder is safe, is not
contaminated by asbestos and does not cause cancer.'
Tiger
Joyce, president of the American Tort Reform Association, pointed to
how long it took the trial judge to read the jury its instructions as
an indication of how unfair the trial was to J&J.
'When
a defendant is facing a case where
it takes over five hours for the judge to read the jury instructions
to the jury, you just have to ask yourself what are
we doing here,' said Joyce.
The
American Tort Reform Association often backs limits on liability
lawsuits.
The
$1.6 billion in punitive damages is out of line and should be
reduced, the company also argued in a brief that was written by Neal
Katyal, a Washington lawyer who aligns with progressive causes and
also represents corporate clients.
Katyal,
who was the acting top Supreme Court lawyer in the Obama
administration, declined an on-the-record interview with the
Associated Press.
The
U.S. Supreme Court will report by Tuesday whether or not it will take
part in the case.
If
it does,
Justice Samuel Alito will not be taking part in the court proceedings
for this case.
The
justice reported that he owned $15,000 to $50,000 in Johnson &
Johnson stock last year.
Federal
law prohibits judges from sitting on cases in which they have
financial interest.
Two
notable virologists claim to have found "unique fingerprints"
on COVID-19 samples that only could have arisen from laboratory
manipulation, according to an explosive 22-page paper obtained by the
Daily Mail.
British
professor Angus Dalgleish - best known for creating the world's first
'HIV vaccine', and Norwegian virologist Dr. Birger Sørensen - chair
of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, who has published 31
peer-reviewed papers and holds several patents, wrote that while
analyzing virus samples last year, the pair discovered "unique
fingerprints" in the form of "six inserts" created
through gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology
in China.
Vaccine
Expert Warns: “We Made a Big Mistake” Canadian vaccine expert Dr.
Byram Bridle recently spoke of the terrifying serious side effect
June
1, 2021
Canadian
vaccine expert Dr. Byram Bridle recently spoke of the terrifying
reasons serious side effects, including heart inflammation and
vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), may occur
in those who have received the COVID-19 vaccine. He explained that
critical information has recently been discovered that centers around
spike proteins—a crucial element in both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and
the COVID-19 vaccines.
Dr.
Bridle, Associate Professor of Viral Immunology at the University of
Guelph, received funding to develop a novel vaccine platform and is
very much pro-vaccine. Nonetheless, he insists science must be
properly performed and then followed carefully before entering into
the public rollout of vaccines. Brindle, who stated the importance of
sharing this new information openly, recently visited On Point with
Alex Pierson and spoke at length on the “scary” situation facing
humanity as the push to vaccinate the global population against
SARS-CoV-2 gains momentum. He explained that, through cutting edge,
peer-reviewed science, we’ve learned more about the many problems
associated with spike proteins and COVID-19 vaccines:
SARS-CoV-2—which
has been shown to cross the blood-brain barrier in mice and cause
many kinds of heart, blood vessel, and brain damage—has a spike
protein on its surface, allowing the virus to infect our bodies.
Likewise, research within the scientific community also reveals
various cardiovascular and heart problems, bleeding, and clotting
when studying the disease in humans. That same research also
establishes that the spike protein alone is almost entirely
responsible for damage to the cardiovascular system if circulating in
the body.
"Recent
studies suggest that the spike protein produced in response to
vaccination, may bind and interact with various cells throughout the
body, via their ACE2 receptors, potentially resulting in damage to
various tissues and organs."
FAUCIgate
It
doesn’t get any bigger that FAUCIgate.
How
so?
Just
look at what this capo di tutti i capi of the Medical Mafia — Dr.
Anthony Fauci — has gotten away with since the beginning of this
manufactured coronavirus pandemic and meticulously staged panic.
An
accurate accounting of the countless deaths, widespread disease and
community destruction, damage to the national and state economies,
societal collapse and citywide devastation, bankrupted businesses and
ruined families, etc. is simply too long to list here. Nevertheless,
when the damage is finally assessed, few individuals on the national
stage will be found as culpable as Dr. Anthony Stephen Fauci.
Only
the Godfather of the Medical Mafia could have gotten away with such a
catastrophic crime spree against the American people—IN BROAD
DAYLIGHT!
Anthony
Fauci’s pandemic emails: ‘All is well despite some crazy people
in this world’
Damian
Paletta, Yasmeen Abutaleb
As the coronavirus pandemic engulfed the world last spring,
Science magazine quoted a top Chinese health official saying that the
United States and other Western nations were making a “big mistake” by
not telling people to mask up.
Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, listens as President Donald Trump
participates in a vaccine development event at the…
The official, George Gao, worried that the comment might
upset his longtime friend Anthony S. Fauci, Washington’s leading expert
on infectious diseases. So amid the deepening crisis, Gao reached out
to clear the air.
“I saw the Science interview, how could I say such a word ‘big
mistake’ about others? That was journalist’s wording. Hope you
understand,” Gao, director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control
and Prevention, wrote to Fauci in a March 28 email. "Lets work together
to get the virus out of the earth.”
“Lets
work together to get the virus out of the earth.”
“I understand completely. No problem,” Fauci wrote back. “We
will get through this together.”
The previously unreported exchange was among 866 pages of
Fauci’s emails obtained by The Washington Post as part of a Freedom of
Information Act request. The correspondence from March and April 2020
opens a window to Fauci’s world during some of the most frantic days of
the crisis, when the longtime director of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases was struggling to bring coherence to
the Trump administration’s chaotic response to the virus and President
Donald Trump was seeking to minimize its severity.
Fauci’s actions during that period and beyond remain an
intense focus for many Americans and political leaders. Now serving his
seventh president, Fauci, 80, is helping to craft President Biden’s
pandemic strategy, and many Republicans accuse him of playing a key
role in Trump’s loss in the November election.
During daily televised briefings at the White House, Fauci
emerged as an at times reluctant — and polarizing — media star: To
Trump supporters, he was a contrarian who seemed to undermine the
president at every turn, while others viewed him as a reassuring voice
of reason. The emails show that he was inundated with correspondence
from colleagues, hospital administrators, foreign governments and
random strangers — about 1,000 messages a day, he says at one point —
writing to seek his advice, solicit his help or simply offer
encouragement.
The medical director of the National Football League Players
Association asked Fauci for a confidential briefing on how to safely
start the next NFL season. A documentary filmmaker working on a
forthcoming Disney-backed biopic asked to ride along as Fauci drove to
work. An adviser to Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates expressed concern
about Fauci’s health. And a senior House Republican told Fauci to “keep
being a science truth teller” despite skepticism about the virus from
other GOP lawmakers and Trump himself.
“I was getting every single kind of question, mostly people
who were a little bit confused about the mixed messages that were
coming out of the White House and wanted to know what’s the real
scoop,” Fauci said in a recent interview. “I have a reputation that I
respond to people when they ask for help, even if it takes a long time.
And it’s very time consuming, but I do” respond.
The released emails show that Fauci indeed tried to answer
many queries, sometimes hitting “send” well after midnight. And even as
Trump ratcheted up attacks on China for not containing the virus after
it was first discovered there, Fauci sought to maintain ties with Gao,
a well-regarded Chinese scientific leader — and Gao with him.
After Fauci faced threats from Trump supporters who blamed
him for supporting social distancing rules that closed schools, tanked
the economy and threatened Trump’s reelection prospects, Gao, a member
of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, emailed again.
“I saw some news (hope it is fake) that [you] are being
attacked by some people. Hope you are well under such a irrational
situation,” Gao wrote on April 8.
“Thank you for your kind note,” Fauci replied three days
later. “All is well despite some crazy people in this world.”
‘Cover
your six’
Threats from the “crazy people” would lead U.S. officials to
assign Fauci a full-time security detail. On April 26, he received an
email from Freddie Barnes, a military veteran and chaplain with North
Carolina’s Department of Public Safety writing “to express my profound
appreciation to you for your work during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
“I especially appreciate how you have spent considerable time
and capital reaching out to the Black and brown communities,” Barnes
wrote. “For you to be intentional about keeping minority communities in
the loop is commendable, especially since these communities will be
absorbing the disproportionate share of sicknesses and deaths coming
from COVID-19.”
He ended the email with a warning: “Take care and ‘Cover your
six’ ” — military slang for “watch your back.”
‘What
keeps me up at night’
On April 14, 2020, a day when nearly 3,000 Americans would
die of covid-19, the disease caused by the virus, Fauci received an
earnest list of questions from a senior official in the Office of the
Surgeon General in the Army and U.S. Army Medical Command.
“You are the voice of reason for millions of concerned
citizens,” wrote the official, whose name was redacted in the released
emails. A list of questions followed: Can the virus be contracted from
a corpse? Can someone who has taken hydroxychloroquine for years
contract the virus? Are masks and gloves truly effective?
Finally: “What keeps you up at night, regarding COVID-19?”
Fauci forwarded the email to some of his top advisers and
asked for help crafting a response. He replied a few days later.
“I have said in the past that what keeps me up at night is the
possibility of a pandemic respiratory infection. We are in that now,
and what keeps me up at night is the response, a major part of which is
the development of an effective vaccine and treatments for COVID-19.”
‘Confidential’
In the early days of the pandemic, everyone, it seemed,
wanted a piece of Fauci. Numerous organizations wrote to offer awards
and honorariums. PayPal wanted the doctor to speak to its 23,000
employees. Michael Milken, chairman of the Milken Institute, a
California-based think tank, wanted Fauci to appear on his podcast.
Anthony Foxx, President Barack Obama’s transportation secretary, wanted
advice for the travel industry.
Italian media outlets constantly asked for interviews. One
person wanted Fauci to co-write an op-ed. (“How do we nicely say no to
this person?” Fauci asked his staff.)
One email said that Robert Iger, executive chairman of the
Walt Disney Co., was immensely supportive of a documentary about Fauci
that would feature footage discreetly shot as the doctor went about his
pandemic duties. The film is set to be released later this year.
The NFL Players Association also came calling. Thom Mayer,
the NFLPA’s medical director, emailed Courtney Billet, one of Fauci’s
top aides, on April 4 and said he had asked that “we stand up a joint
NFLPA-NFL Task Force … with a view towards if and when we might look
towards an NFL season, even if games are played with no fans.”
“My request is to have Dr. Fauci give a telephone briefing to
our group on this difficult topic, which would of course be
confidential. The floor would be his and I could brief him prior to the
call on what we have been working on,” Mayer wrote. He suggested the
week of April 13 — “although of course the modeling shows that would be
during the peak of the outbreak.”
It is unclear how Fauci immediately responded; his email to
an aide about Mayer’s request is redacted. Fauci did confer with the
NFL and other sports leagues about their seasons, he said. But he was
not wholly enthusiastic: In a May interview with NBC’s Peter King,
Fauci said it was impossible to know whether the NFL season could be
salvaged.
“The virus will make the decision for us,” Fauci said, a
comment that enraged Trump.
On another occasion, an official at the Department of Health
and Human Services suggested that the shortage of personal protective
equipment could be solved by using “doggie cones.” Fauci sent a polite
thank you.
‘I
am seriously worried about you’
On April 1, the emails show, Fauci spoke by phone with Gates
about a global vaccine effort. The doctor said he was “enthusiastic
about moving forward on a collaborative and hopefully synergistic
approach to COVID-19” involving federal health agencies and the Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation, according to the emails.
Gates quickly relayed the conversation to Emilio Emini, a top
foundation executive who was tasked with coordinating vaccine efforts.
Emini immediately emailed Fauci — and raised concerns about the
doctor’s health.
“I see you on TV almost every day, and although you continue
to have considerable energy, I am seriously worried about you,” Emini
wrote. “The nation and the world absolutely need your leadership.”
Fauci wrote back at 1:53 a.m., saying, “I will try to engage
as much as I can given my current circumstances.”
In an interview, Fauci said he has had a long-standing
relationship with Gates, whose foundation focuses on global vaccine
access, among other issues. He said that he and Gates talk about every
two weeks and that they have remained in touch about how to get
coronavirus vaccines to the rest of the world.
On April 10, Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) emailed Fauci a
question about hydroxychloroquine, a drug Trump was aggressively
pushing as a treatment for the coronavirus despite scant evidence of
its efficacy. The drug is used to treat lupus, and Upton asked whether
anyone with that disease had contracted the coronavirus.
The next day, Fauci wrote back that the answer was “almost
certainly yes” but that there was not enough data to make any final
conclusions. Their electronic rapport intensified when Upton, a
moderate and one of 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump
after the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, tried to explain why some of his
colleagues were trying to block more money for the U.S. pandemic
response.
“Keep being a science truth teller,” Upton urged Fauci in
another email.
Fauci responded five hours later.
“Thanks, Fred. I appreciate your note.”
‘Apologies
for a poor poker face’
Although Fauci often accepted praise for challenging the
president, the released emails do not show him directly criticizing
Trump. On several occasions, the emails show Fauci and White House
officials staying in close contact.
Near midnight on April 11, the day before Easter, Marc Short,
Vice President Mike Pence’s chief of staff, emailed Fauci about some
apparent crossed wires. “You correctly noticed the symptoms but
misdiagnosed the root cause,” Short wrote in a heavily redacted email
that closes: “Apologies for a poor poker face.”
At the time, Trump was anxiously trying to reopen the economy
despite Fauci’s reluctance. Less than 13 hours after receiving Short’s
email, Fauci responded: “Thanks for the note. Understood. I wish you a
peaceful and enjoyable day with your family.”
‘Hopefully
this all stops soon’
At times, Fauci grew bewildered by the public fascination
with him, the emails show. On March 31, a colleague at the National
Institutes of Health sent Fauci an article from The Post with the headline, “Fauci
socks, Fauci doughnuts, Fauci fan art: The coronavirus expert attracts
a cult following.”
“Truly surrealistic. Hopefully, this all stops soon,” Fauci
replied. In another note, he added: “It is not at all pleasant, that is
for sure.”
On April 7, Fauci received a Google News alert for his name.
One of the articles was titled, “ ‘Cuomo Crush and ‘Fauci Fever’ —
Sexualization of These Men Is a Real Thing on the Internet.” Fauci
forwarded the note to someone (the name and email address are redacted)
and urged the person to click on the link.
“It will blow your mind,” the doctor wrote. “Our society is
really totally nuts.”
When a White House news briefing was canceled one day —
freeing Fauci from a TV appearance — he sent his staff a message with
two smiley-face emoji.
Most of the emails were deadly serious, however. In one
exchange, a former acquaintance who described himself as “just a
working class guy” who once drank beers with Fauci in Boulder, Colo.,
urges the doctor to “stand up to power and speak the harsh truth to the
people of this country.”
“The leadership from the top is utterly lacking and
incompetent and dangerous to the American people. … We need a unified
and professional federal response to this unprecedented crisis,” the
man wrote. ”My dad was born during the first worldwide modern pandemic,
and I don’t really want to see him leave from this current one.”
Fauci responded within hours.
“Thank you for your note,” he wrote. “I hear you!”
About
this story
Additional reporting by Steven Zeitchik and Julie Tate. Design and
development by Jake Crump. Photo editing by Bronwen Latimer.
A
few interesting findings that have been dug up so far:
1. In
late February 2020, Dr. Fauci received an email alerting him that
COVID was released (not accidentally escaped) from a lab in China.
Dr. Fauci forwarded the email to a person at NIH/NIAID and told them
to “handle it” Page 522
2. In
mid-March 2020, Dr. Fauci received an email titled “Coronavirus
bioweapon production method”, which supposedly included
instructions of how COVID was created. Page 2286
3. In
mid-April 2020, Dr. Fauci received an email from researcher Peter
Daszak, tied to Wuhan lab, thanking Dr. Fauci for “publicly
rejecting the lab leak theory”. Page 1150
Peter
Daszak is also known as Biden’s “COVID cover-up
chief”. peterdaszak.com/
4. Fauci
had urgent, time sensitive discussions about gain-of function, he
told colleagues that retail masks don’t work due to the size of the
virus, and, he ignored a scientist who told him that the CCP was
lying about COVID. Page 3027
5.The
Gates Foundation innovations were proposed to Dr. Fauci. Page
1383
6. Possible
sequencing of COVID by India, acknowledged by Dr. Fauci. Page
3200
7. Mark
Zuckerberg and Dr. Fauci exchanged emails, talking about the COVID
jabs back in late-February 2020, prior to the March 2020 lockdowns.
They were already working on trials at that time.
These
emails were before Dr Fauci’s February 29th 2020 interview with
MSM, saying that we do not need to worry about COVID yet.
He
also called the risk of COVID ‘minuscule’ back in mid-February
2020. If he believed that to be the case, why discuss vaccines with
Zuckerberg within a few weeks time? Page 243
8. Fauci
was informed (and replied to) an email about the possibility that
COVID was engineered (i.e., lab origin), back on February 1st
2020. Pages 3187 ~ 3193
9. In
early-March 2020, someone emailed Fauci suggesting that the media
ought not to be fear-monger, rather, give perspective (with
comparisons to other illnesses and diseases). Page 37
In
newly FOIA'd emails, there are at least two instances of Fauci
sending colleagues a paper about "gain of function"
research potentially being relevant to COVID. Back when mentioning
this prospect got you banned from social media and labeled a
conspiracy theorist pic.twitter.com/2anDbJK9MI
In
a trove of newly leaked emails, one seems to show that Dr. Fauci was
in a panic that the NIH, where he was deeply involved, might have
ties to the coronavirus leak in China revealed.
Here’s
the first email from Fauci to Hugh Auchincloss at NIH on February
1st, 2020:
There’s
definitely a sense of urgency and alarm in Fauci’s email.
Below
is the reply from Auchincloss:
The
response from Auchincloss is key, where he says “The
paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain
of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH.
Not sure what this means since Emily is sure that no Coronavirus work
has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to determine if we
have any distant ties to this work abroad.”
People
apparently discovered that article in March of last year and
circulated it as proof that the virus could have originated in a lab.
THOSE DAMN CONSPIRACY THEORISTS! “Scientists believe that an animal
is the most likely source of the coronavirus”, therefore Nature
editors promptly appended an addendum noting there’s no indication
it came from a lab.
Of
course now we have the article and the emails above, and according to
Tom Cotton, Fauci’s got some answering to do:
Dr
Fauci’s emails have been released via a Freedom of Information Act
request, and there is some pretty interesting stuff in them,
particularly one email where a researcher who funded the Wuhan
Institute of Virology thanks Fauci for publicly dismissing the lab
leak theory early on during the pandemic.
The
email from Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance, a
group that has extensive ties to the Wuhan lab gain of function
research, sent the email to Fauci on April 18, 2020, roughly six
weeks after the outbreak had taken hold.
Dr.
Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has defended the natural-origin theory
for SARS-CoV-2 since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic
In
his biggest about-face to date, Fauci is now saying he’s “not
convinced” the virus had a natural origin after all, and that we
must continue to investigate “what went on in China until we find
out, to the best of our ability, what happened”
Considering
Fauci’s opinion has been used by mainstream media and fact checkers
to censor any and all other experts, this very public 180 is no doubt
causing embarrassment among mainstream reporters
Fauci
is now also denying ever having funded gain-of-function research,
even though there’s irrefutable evidence that he did. It seems he’s
trying to redefine “gain-of-function,” such that none of the
research he paid for will fall under that definition
Dr.
Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has been a staunch defender of the
natural-origin theory for SARS-CoV-2 since the beginning of the
COVID-19 pandemic.
Back
in May 2020, CNN used Fauci’s statements on the issue as proof that
then-President Donald Trump was spouting a ridiculous conspiracy
theory:1
“For
weeks now, President Donald Trump has been making the case that the
coronavirus originated not in nature but in a lab in Wuhan, China,”
CNN wrote.2
“Enter
Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Disease and perhaps the single most prominent doctor in
the world at the moment. In an interview with National Geographic …
Fauci was definitive about the origins of the virus …
The
White House has officially admitted that fake vaccination programs
have been used by the United States as a cover for covertly stealing
DNA samples from the public as part of the so-called “war on
terror.” The aim of the scheme, carried out in the Middle East, was
to use DNA analysis to identify suspected terrorists who would then
be targeted to be killed by the United States.
As
the New York Times reported in 2011, “In the months before Osama
bin Laden was killed, the Central Intelligence Agency ran a phony
vaccination program in Abbottabad, Pakistan, as a ruse to obtain DNA
evidence from members of Bin Laden’s family thought to be holed up
in an expansive compound there.” (1)
“CIA
agents recruited a senior Pakistani doctor to organize the vaccine
drive in Abbottabad, even starting the “project” in a poorer part
of town to make it look more authentic,” reports The Guardian (2).
“Masks
are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading
infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting
uninfected people from acquiring infection. The
typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in
keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material.
It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keep out gross
droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you,” Fauci wrote. “I
do not recommend that you wear a mask, particularly since you are
going to a very low risk location. Your instincts are correct,
money is best spent on medical countermeasures such as diagnostics
and vaccines.”
Rand
Paul calls for Fauci to be fired after shocking email revelations
Sen.
Rand Paul, who grilled Dr. Anthony Fauci in Senate hearings, and
others are calling for Fauci to be removed after thousand of pages of
emails were released as a result of a FOIA request.
Sen.
Rand Paul, who grilled Dr. Anthony Fauci in Senate hearings, and
others are calling for Fauci to be removed after thousands
of pages of emails were released as a result of a FOIA request
from Buzzfeed and Washington
Post.
Can’t
wait to see the media try to spin the Fauci FOIA emails.
Rand
Paul tweeted "told
you. #firefauci Can't wait to see the media try to spin the Fauci
FOIA emails."
In
the emails, Fauci said early on that face masks are not helpful,
received information that there was reason to believe the virus was
engineered, and advocated early for school closures despite evidence
showing that kids were not at high risk of contracting or spreading
the illness.
Rep.
Marjorie Taylor Greene echoed Paul and promoted her bill the "Fire
Fauci Act." In the bill Greene says, "Dr. Anthony Fauci,
M.D., earned $434,312 in 2020" the bill continues, "Dr.
Fauci is not only the highest paid doctor in the Federal Government,
but the highest paid of any of the 4,000,000 Federal employees,
including the President."
Fauci's
leaked emails are shocking to say the least. He needs to be FIRED!
I
introduced a bill to do just that ... HR 2316, the "Fire Fauci
Act".
— Rep.
Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) June
2, 2021
Human
Events'
Jack Posobiec speculate that the White House is working on an exit
strategy for Dr. Fauci, according to sources.
White
House staff are actively discussing an exit strategy for Dr Anthony
Fauci following the release of his emails yesterday, per WH official
Fauci
is now accused of not "following the science" but instead
"taking the path of least resistance" in accordance with
his experience as a life bureaucrat.
The
Fauci emails just show that Fauci consistently took the path of least
resistance: downplaying the Wuhan lab leak theory, flip-flopping on
masking, militantly fighting Rand Paul over post-covid immunity even
though he knew better (Paul was right).
Many
are shocked by the fact that Dr. Fauci was told in January of 2020
that researches were seeing signs that the virus was not evolved
naturally but instead engineered and manipulated. Still, Dr. Fauci
told the public that the lab leak theory was a "myth."
Kristian
G. Anderson in a January 31, 2020 email to Anthony Fauci:
“…Eddie,
Bob, Mike and myself all find the genome inconsistent with
expectations from evolutionary theory.”
Peter
Daszak, a figure heavily involved in the Wuhan Virology Institute
thanked Fauci for now seems like misleading the public when it comes
to the lab leak theory. Many are calling into question Fauci motives
now that these connections have been revealed.
Peter
Daszak, who was deeply involved both in Wuhan coronavirus research
&
in misleading the public about the likelihood of a lab leak, thanked
Fauci for helping "dispel the myths" around COVID origins
and blamed Fox News for targeting his grant. From the @JasonLeopold
FOIA batch pic.twitter.com/LgloFVaFZX
Josh
Sigurdson reports on the latest ruling against mask mandates by Judge
Christian Dettmar of the Weimar District Court in Germany who ruled
that masks are not only harmful to children, but they are illegal and
must be stopped.
Following
the ruling, the judge’s home was raided and his phone was seized in
true jackboot style.
At
the same time, we see similar rulings in Oklahoma and other US
states. It seems like there’s some semblance of backlash over masks
which destroy immune systems and cause lung problems as even Fauci
says that he wears it as theater.
Meanwhile,
billions of people around the world continue to be fooled by a virus
that’s never been isolated from a single human being ever, only
viral monkey kidney cells and propped up by PCR tests that the WHO
says themselves are 96% false positive within the margin of error of
4% which easily makes the test 100% false positive over 40 cycles.
And
positive for what?
We
will continue to cover this issue closely as we have since January of
2020. Stay tuned for more from WAM!
“There
is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming
administration in the arena of infectious diseases both chronic
infectious diseases in the sense of already on-going disease and
certainly we have a large burden of that. But also there will be a
surprise outbreak
January
11, 2017
04/05/2020
04:00
pm ET
Updated
Apr 06, 2020
Dr.
Fauci Warned In 2017 Of ‘Surprise Outbreak’ During Trump
Administration
“There
is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming
administration in the arena of infectious diseases,” he
said.
Dr.
Anthony Fauci, the
U.S. government’s top infectious disease specialist, warned in
early 2017 that a “surprise outbreak” would occur during the
Trump
administration,
and he said that more needed to be done to prepare for a pandemic.
“There
is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming
administration in the arena of infectious diseases,”
he said in a speech titled “Pandemic
Preparedness in the Next Administration” at Georgetown
University Medical Center. He delivered it just days before Trump was
inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2017.
Fauci,
who has overseen the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, warned that looming health challenges
would involve both chronic diseases ― ones already ongoing ―
as well as “a surprise outbreak.”
“No
matter what, history has told us definitively that [outbreaks] will
happen,” he said. “It is a perpetual challenge. It is not going
to go away. The thing we’re
extraordinarily confident about is that we are going to see this in
the next few years.”
Fauci
ticked off a list of measures needed to prepare for such a crisis,
including creating and strengthening global health surveillance
systems, as well as public health and health care infrastructure;
practicing transparency and honest communication with the public;
coordinating and collaborating on both basic and clinical research,
and developing universal platform technologies to better facilitate
the development of vaccines.
“The
mistake that so many people have made … is a failure to look beyond
our own borders in the issue of the globality of health issues, not
only things that are there that will come here but surprises that
we’ll have,” he said in his prescient remarks.
Despite
Fauci’s early warnings and calls for action, a report on Sunday
analyzing the
Trump administration’s response to the coronavirus pandemic
found that federal agencies waited until the middle of last month to
order vital medical supplies and equipment to fight the coronavirus,
despite warnings about its pandemic potential being made in January.
As the virus has spread across the country, reports persist of mass
shortages of supplies in hospitals and medical centers.
“We
basically wasted two months,” Kathleen Sebelius, who served as the
Health and Human Services secretary during the Obama administration,
told The Associated Press of the government’s response.
Fauci
has also expressed exasperation over the efforts to stem the tide of
COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus. On Thursday, he
spoke out against states that have not issued a stay-at-home
order to help prevent the virus from spreading.
“I
don’t understand why that’s not happening,” he said on CNN of
stay-at-home orders in all 50 states. “The
tension between federally mandated versus states’ rights
to do what they want is something I don’t want to get into. But if
you look at what is going on in this country, I do not understand why
we are not doing that. We really should be.”
Dr.
Fauci revealed his fears of a 'surprise outbreak' back in 2017 and
warned the upcoming Trump administration would face 'challenges' with
infectious diseases in a Georgetown speech
Dr.
Anthony Fauci warned of a 'surprise outbreak' three years before the
COVID-19 pandemic
His
speech about 'Pandemic Prepardness' was made in February 2017 at
Georgetown University
Fauci
said the upcoming administration would 'no doubt' face challenges
with infectious diseases
He
added that he's more worried of an influenza pandemic than the HIV
crisis and bio-terror attacks
Several
healthcare professionals have and continue to discuss novel
outbreaks
Worldwide COVID-19 cases have
surpassed one million and 64,000 deaths
Dr.
Anthony
Fauci,
the White House's top infectious disease expert, warned of a
'surprise outbreak' in a speech given three years before the global
COVID-19
pandemic.
In
his speech titled 'Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration,'
Dr. Fauci told attendees at Georgetown University in January 2017
that the upcoming presidential administration would face 'challenges'
with infectious diseases.
Fauci
said: 'If there's one message that I want to leave with you today
that is based on my experience... there is no question that
there will be a challenge [for] the coming administration in the
arena of infectious diseases.
'But
also there will be a surprise outbreak...there is no doubt in
anyone's mind [the administration] will be faced with challenges
their predecessors were faced with.'
Dr.
Fauci, who served under five presidential administrations, later
added that he cautioned former President George W. Bush to be more
concerned with a potential 'influenza pandemic' than bioterrorism.
'I
worry more about the natural occurrence of an influenza pandemic and
the ongoing plague of HIV than I do about a bio-terror attack,' he
said, adding that people should pay attention to natural
causes.
In
regards to the Trump administration, Fauci mentioned possible
challenges that included a resurgence in the Zika Virus or a new flu
pandemic.
He
said: 'What is for sure...history has told us definitively that it
will happen because infectious diseases [are] a perpetual challenge.'
Like
Dr. Fauci, other researchers and medical leaders, have long discussed
a novel, unprecedented illness that would permeate the world and
leave lasting effects on global societies.
In
2015, Microsoft founder Bill Gates speculated in a Ted Talk that
illness would be the cause of future mass casualties - not wars.
'If
anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s
most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not
missiles, but microbes,' he said, citing lessons learned from Western
Africa's 2014 Ebola virus as reference.
But
the parameters and specific characteristics of the illness were
unclear before COVID-19 appeared in Wuhan, China, in
late-December.
Since
its first appearance last year, there are over one million confirmed
coronavirus cases and at least 64,000 deaths.
Although
coronavirus initially devastated countries like China and Italy, the
United States has become the world leader in confirmed cases at
311,632. At least 8,503 people have died.
National
epicenters like New York have taken the brunt of the deadly pandemic
amid a shortage in medical supplies, like face masks and gloves, and
a lapse in COVID-19 testing.
President
Trump said Saturday that Americans should brace for 'lot of deaths'
in the upcoming weeks and that it will be a 'very horrendous' time
for the US.
'But
there will be death,' he admitted before continuing to tout the use
of the malaria drug, hydroxychloroquine, as a treatment.
'This
will probably be the toughest week - between this week and next
week,' Trump told reporters.
'There
will be a lot of death, unfortunately. But a lot less death than if
this wasn't done,' he added of the measures taken to prevent the
spread of the virus.'
Meanwhile,
the pandemic has dealt blows to the world economy and, in the United
States, the Dow Jones has stumbled amid financial uncertainties.
The
number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits last
week has shot to a record 6.6 million - as layoffs increased amid the
coronavirus pandemic and more states enforced stay-at-home orders.
New
claims for unemployment benefits rose to 6.65 million in the week
ending March 28, according to figures released by the Department of
Labor on Thursday.
Those
figures suggest the United States lost about 6% of its 152 million
jobs in half a month.
The
number of first-time applications for jobless benefits was double the
previous record of 3.3 million new claims filed for the week ending
March 21.
Critics
of Trump's coronavirus response fear the United States will slide
into a recession as businesses remain closed.
Trump
signaled that it was a 'good idea' to assemble a second coronavirus
task force to come up with a plan to reopen the economy.
The
president was responding to a Friday tweet from Dana Perino, the
White House press secretary under President George W. Bush and
current Fox News Channel host.
'I
think we need a 2nd task force assembled at the direction of POTUS to
look ahead to reopening of the economy,' Perino wrote. 'Made up of a
nonpartisan/bipartisan mix of experts across industry sectors, so
that we have their recommendations & plan - let 1st taskforce
focus on crisis at the moment.'
He
previously pushed for an April 12 deadline to have American's return
to work, but settled for social distancing orders to continue through
the end of the month.
An
Oregon woman is reportedly sorry that she took the Johnson &
Johnson (J&J) “vaccine” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19)
after the jab caused her to develop “rare” blood clots in her
lungs, throat, stomach and brain.
The
“symptoms” started just six days after Barbara Buchanan decided
to “do her part” to “stop the spread” by taking J&J’s
one-dose injection for the Chinese Virus, which the “experts”
claim is perfectly “safe and effective.”
The
63-year-old says she initially developed a low-grade fever and “just
felt really tired,” believing her symptoms to be the result of
seasonal allergies. After she started developing severe cramping in
her legs and coughing up blood, however, Buchanan realized that
something was very wrong.
Doctors
at Providence St. Vincent Medical Center ran a CT scan and observed
that Buchanan had developed severe blood clotting all throughout her
body, which she now knows was caused by the shot.
Welcome
to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the
most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours
(6/1/21).
As
always, take the information discussed in the video below and
research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone
telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is
likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.
"Trump
administration will not only be challenged by ongoing global health
threats such as influenza and HIV, but also a surprise disease
outbreak," "The thing we're extraordinarily confident
about is that we're going to see this in the next few years."
A
group of almost one thousand medical doctors in Germany called
‘Doctors for Information’, which is supported by more than 7,000
professionals including attorneys, scientists, teachers etc., made a
shocking statement during a national press conference: (1)
‘The
Corona panic is a play. It's a scam. A swindle. It's high time we
understood that we're in the midst of a global crime.'
This
large group of medical experts publishes a newspaper with circulation
of 500,000 copies every week, to alert the public about the
misinformation in the mainstream media about the coronavirus. They
also organize mass protests with millions of people throughout
Europe.
GOP
lawmakers lashed out at White House chief medical adviser Dr.
Anthony Fauci Wednesday after a bevy of his emails from the early
days of the coronavirus pandemic were made public.
Many
Republicans focused their ire on the fact that Fauci received
messages in early 2020 warning that the virus
had been “engineered” or may have otherwise emerged from a
lab in Wuhan, China, while he was publicly dismissing the
possibility.
Sen.
Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has clashed with Fauci on a number of
pandemic-related issues this year, set the tone early Wednesday by
tweeting “Told you” followed by an emoji of a pair of eyes
and the hashtag “#firefauci.”
“He
needs to be FIRED!” Greene followed that tweet by posting an image
of herself wearing a black mask bearing the words “Fire Fauci.”
“Big
Tech was censoring posts about the Wuhan lab leak. The media was
calling people who talked about the Wuhan lab leak conspiracy
theorists,” House Minority Whip Steve Scalise
(R-La.) tweeted. “All while Fauci himself was emailing about
COVID-19 possibly leaking from the Wuhan lab. Let that sink in.”
Former
White House chief of staff Mark Meadows claimed to Fox News on
Wednesday that Fauci did not relay any of the correspondence about
the lab leak theory to the Trump administration’s coronavirus task
force in early 2020.
“Part
of the troubling thing that we’re seeing with these emails that are
coming out is, not only do they seem to correspond with what
President Trump said and what [then-] Secretary [of State Mike]
Pompeo said in terms of the origins of the virus,” Meadows said on
“Hannity,” “but it indicates that Dr. Fauci had knowledge, or
at least a suspicion, of things not happening in an evolutionary
manner very early on, and he didn’t share that … That’s very
troubling and something that we do need to get to the bottom of.”
Rep.
Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), the top Republican on the House
Energy & Commerce Committee, said Wednesday the emails show the
need for more openness from the National Institutes of Health.
“We
must learn how the COVID-19 pandemic started and where it came from
so that we can respond and be prepared for the world’s next
pandemic,” Rodgers said in a statement. “NIH must be more
forthcoming with information they currently have. We need more
transparency from the NIH to inform and complete a thorough
scientific investigation.”
“Fauci
lost my trust long before this,” claimed Rep.
Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas). “Never contextualizing his statements,
never giving honest risk assessments, always treating us like we are
too stupid to do anything but lockdown and wear masks forever. The
emails show it was worse than we thought.”
Rep.
Lisa McClain (R-Mich.) focused on an email in which Fauci responded
to a Chinese health official who apologized for saying the US and
other countries had made a “big mistake” by not encouraging
people to wear masks from the start of the pandemic.
“Instead
of holding the [Chinese Communist Party] accountable for the global
pandemic, Dr. Fauci instead told them we will ‘get through this
together,'” McClain raged. “This is disgraceful.”
Rep.
Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), who introduced
a bill last month called the Fauci Incompetence Requires Early
Dismissal (FIRED) Act, tweeted that it was “time
for Americans to hear from other voices. Dr. Fauci has lost
credibility.”
The
3,200 pages of emails dating from between January and June 2020 were
released to
BuzzFeed News following a Freedom of Information Act request.
For
most of last year, the idea that the coronavirus pandemic could have
been triggered by a laboratory accident in Wuhan, China, was largely
dismissed as a racist conspiracy theory of the alt-right. The
Washington Post
in early 2020 accused Senator
Tom Cotton of "fanning the embers of a conspiracy theory
that has been repeatedly debunked by experts." CNN
jumped in with "How to debunk coronavirus conspiracy theories
and misinformation from friends and family." Most other
mainstream outlets, from The
New York Times
("fringe theory") to NPR ("Scientists debunk lab
accident theory"), were equally dismissive. (Newsweek
was an exception, reporting
in April 2020 that the WIV was involved in gain-of-function
research and might have been the site of a lab leak; Mother Jones,
Business Insider, the NY Post and FOX News were also exceptions.) But
in the last week or so, the story has burst into the public
discourse. President Joe
Biden has demanded an investigation by U.S. intelligence. And the
mainstream media, in an astonishing about-face, is treating the
possibility with deadly seriousness.
The
reason for the sudden shift in attitudes is clear: over the weeks and
months of the pandemic, the pileup of circumstantial evidence
pointing to the Wuhan lab kept growing—until it became too
substantial to ignore.
The
people responsible for uncovering this evidence are not journalists
or spies or scientists. They are a group of amateur sleuths, with few
resources except curiosity and a willingness to spend days combing
the internet for clues. Throughout the pandemic, about two dozen or
so correspondents, many anonymous, working independently from many
different countries, have uncovered obscure documents, pieced
together the information, and explained it all in long threads on
Twitter—in a kind of open-source, collective brainstorming session
that was part forensic science, part citizen journalism, and entirely
new. They call themselves DRASTIC,
for Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating
COVID-19.
For
a long time, DRASTIC's discoveries stayed confined to the strange
world of Twitter,
known only to a few nerdy followers. The sleuths ran into a fair
number of dead ends, got into the occasional spat with scientists who
disagreed with their interpretations, and produced a firehose of
reporting. Gradually, the quality of their research and the rigor of
their thinking drew a larger following, including many professional
scientists and journalists.
Thanks
to DRASTIC, we now know that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had an
extensive collection of coronaviruses gathered over many years of
foraging in the bat caves, and that many of them—including the
closest known relative to the pandemic virus, SARS-CoV-2—came from
a mineshaft where three men died from a suspected SARS-like disease
in 2012. We know that the WIV was actively working with these
viruses, using inadequate safety protocols, in ways that could have
triggered the pandemic, and that the lab and Chinese authorities have
gone to great lengths to conceal these activities. We know that the
first cases appeared weeks before the outbreak at the Huanan wet
market that was once thought to be ground zero.
None
of this proves that the pandemic started in the Wuhan lab, of course:
it's entirely possible that it did not. But the evidence assembled by
DRASTIC amounts to what prosecutors call probable cause—a strong,
evidence-based case for a full investigation. It's not clear that the
best efforts of the U.S. and other nations to investigate the
lab-leak hypothesis will ever turn up unequivocal evidence one way or
another, at least without the full cooperation of China, which is
unlikely.
But
if they do, this small, motley group of amateur sleuths will have
broken what may be the biggest story of the 21st century.
This
is how they did it.
Strange
coincidences
The
young Indian man who calls himself The
Seeker is in his late-20s, lives somewhere in eastern India, and
uses a piece of tribal art from his home region of West Bengal for
his Twitter logo, he said via email. His career has been a melange of
architecture, painting, and filmmaking—a khichdi, his mother and
sister call it, meaning a stew of disparate ingredients that adds up
to something surprising and delightful. A voracious autodidact, he'd
become an expert at searching the back alleys of the web, far beyond
the well-lit places patrolled by Google,
for information on whatever topic interested him. He often posted on
Reddit, where he
had accumulated a massive 750,000 karma points. That's all The Seeker
revealed to Newsweek
through email and messaging; he maintains his anonymity.
Like
most people following the news back when the pandemic started, The
Seeker initially believed that the virus had jumped from wild animals
to humans at a Wuhan wet market. (On March 27 he tweeted, "Nobody
wants to see their parents or grandma and grandpa die over a stupid
virus from an exotic animal market.") He believed this because
that's what the mainstream press told him, and the mainstream press
believed it because that is what a handful of scientists had said.
Chief
among these scientists was a biologist named Peter
Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit
research group that ran a large international program to survey
natural pathogens with the potential to cause a pandemic. Daszak had
been collaborating for years with Shi Zhengli, the director of the
Wuhan Institute of Virology and a renowned bat virologist. Daszak
co-authored nearly a dozen papers with Shi and funneled at least
$600,000 of U.S. government grants her way.
When
the pandemic happened to break out on the doorstep of the lab with
the largest collection of coronaviruses in the world, fueling
speculation that the WIV might be involved, Daszak and 26 other
scientists signed a letter that appeared in The Lancet on February
19, 2020. "We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy
theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,"
it stated.
We
now know, thanks to a Freedom
of Information Act request, that Daszak orchestrated the letter
to squelch talk of a lab leak. He drafted it, reached out to fellow
scientists to sign it, and worked behind the scenes to make it seem
that the letter represented the views of a broad range of scientists.
"This statement will not have the EcoHealth Alliance logo on it
and will not be identifiable as coming from any one organization or
person," he wrote
in his pitch to the co-signatories. Scientists whose work had
overlapped with the WIV
agreed not to sign it so they could "put it out in a way
that doesn't link it back to our collaboration."
At
the time, however, there was no hint of Daszak's organizing role. The
letter helped make Daszak a ubiquitous presence in the media, where
he called a lab-leak "preposterous," "baseless,"
and "pure baloney." He also attacked
scientists who published evidence pointing to the lab. Part of
the reason the lab theory made no sense, he argued, was because the
Wuhan lab wasn't culturing any viruses remotely similar to
SARS-CoV-2. (Daszak has not responded to Newsweek's request for
comment.)
For
a long time, Daszak was astonishingly influential. Few in the media
questioned him or pointed out that his career and organization would
be deeply damaged if it turned out his work had indirectly played a
role in the pandemic. His unwitting accomplice was Donald
Trump, who embraced
the theory, turning what should have been a scientific question
into a political one.
When
the Trump administration canceled EcoHealth Alliance contracts that
would have spent millions on new virus research, 60 Minutes ran a
segment that painted Daszak as a martyr to the right-wing conspiracy
machine. For right-thinking people everywhere, it seemed like an easy
call: The enemy of my enemy is my friend: thus, the lab-leak theory
is bunk.
A
Whiff of Censorship
By
early 2020, The Seeker was beginning to question that viewpoint. He
had begun to interact with people who were poking holes in the
conventional wisdom.
One
important piece was an extensive Medium
post by the Canadian longevity entrepreneur Yuri Deigin that
discussed RaTG13, a virus Shi Zhengli had revealed to the world in a
February 3 paper in the journal Nature. In that paper,
Shi presented the first extensive analysis of SARS-CoV-2, which had
seemed to come from nowhere—the virus was unlike any that had been
seen before, including the first SARS, which had killed 774 people
from 2002 to 2004. In her paper, however, Shi also introduced RaTG13,
a virus that is similar in genetic makeup to SARS-CoV-2, making it
the only known close relative at the time.
The
paper was vague about where RaTG13 had come from. It didn't say
exactly where or when RaTG13 had been found, just that it had
previously been detected in a bat in Yunnan Province, in southern
China.
The
paper aroused Deigin's suspicions. He wondered if SARS-CoV-2 might
have emerged through some genetic mixing and matching from a lab
working with RaTG13 or related viruses. His post was cogent and
comprehensive. The Seeker posted Deigin's theory on Reddit, which
promptly suspended his account permanently.
That
early whiff of censorship piqued Seeker's curiosity, so he read more
of the Twitter group's ideas. "I found a lively group of people
eager to debate and explore the topic," he told Newsweek
by email.
It
was an eclectic group. There were entrepreneurs, engineers, and a
microbiologist from the University of Innsbruck named Rossana
Segreto. None of them had known each other in advance; they
gravitated to the forum after independently concluding that the
conventional wisdom of the origins of COVID-19 didn't make sense.
Conversations were kept on track by a wisecracking coordinator living
somewhere in Asia who went by the pseudonym Billy Bostickson, and
whose Twitter icon was a cartoon of a beat-up lab monkey.
The
Seeker fit right in. "They helped me catch up on the debate, and
I started to educate myself," he says. "Before I knew it, I
got hooked into the mystery." He was driven in part by
curiosity, but also by a growing sense of civic duty. "COVID has
taken the lives of countless people and devastated so many others.
But it has also left so many clues that haven't been followed up.
Humanity deserves answers."
The
Seeker and the rest of the group became increasingly convinced that
RaTG13 might hold the key to some of those answers. In a crackling
thread, half a dozen participants hashed out its mysteries,
combing the internet and the WIV's previous papers for clues.
If
there is a moment when the DRASTIC team coalesced into something more
than its disparate parts, it would be this thread. In real time, for
all the world to see, they worked through the data, tested various
hypotheses, corrected each other, and scored some direct hits.
The
key facts quickly came together. The genetic sequence for RaTG13
perfectly matched a small piece of genetic code posted as part of a
paper written by Shi Zhengli years earlier, but never mentioned
again. The code came from a virus the WIV had found in a Yunnan bat.
Connecting key details in the two papers with old news stories, the
DRASTIC team determined that RaTG13 had come from a mineshaft in
Mojiang County, in Yunnan Province, where six men shoveling bat guano
in 2012 had developed pneumonia. Three of them died. DRASTIC wondered
if that event marked the first cases of human beings being infected
with a precursor of SARS-CoV-2—perhaps RaTG13 or something like it.
In
a profile in Scientific
American, Shi Zhengli acknowledged working in a mineshaft in
Mojiang County where miners had died. But she avoided connecting it
to RaTG13 (an omission she had made in her scientific papers as
well), claiming that a fungus in the cave had killed the miners.
That
explanation didn't sit well with the DRASTIC group. They suspected a
SARS-like virus, not a fungus, had killed the miners and that, for
whatever reason, the WIV was trying to hide that fact. It was a
hunch, and they had no way of proving it.
At
this point, The Seeker revealed his research powers to the group. In
his online explorations, he'd recently discovered a massive Chinese
database of academic journals and theses called CNKI. Now he wondered
if somewhere in its vast circuitry might be information on the
sickened miners.
Working
through the night at his bedside table on phone and laptop, fueled by
chai and using Chinese characters with the help of Google Translate,
he plugged in "Mojiang"—the county where the mine was
located—in combination with every other word he could think of that
might be relevant, instantly translating each new flush of results
back to English. "Mojiang + pneumonia"; "Mojiang +
WIV"; "Mojiang + bats"; "Mojiang + SARS."
Each search brought back thousands of results and half a dozen
different databases for journals, books, newspapers, master's theses,
doctoral dissertations. He combed through these results, night after
night, but never found anything useful. When he ran out of energy, he
broke for arcade games and more chai.
He
was on the verge of calling it quits, he says, when he struck gold: a
60-page master's thesis written by a student at Kunming Medical
University in 2013 titled "The Analysis of 6 Patients with
Severe Pneumonia Caused by Unknown Viruses." In exhaustive
detail, it described the conditions and step-by-step treatment of the
miners. It named the suspected culprit: "Caused by SARS-like
[coronavirus] from the Chinese horseshoe bat or other bats."
The
Seeker dropped
the link, without fanfare, on May 18, 2020, then followed up with
a second thesis from a PhD student at the Chinese CDC
confirming much of the information in the first. Four of the miners
had tested positive for antibodies from a SARS-like infection. And
the WIV had been looped in to test samples from them all. (Shortly
after The Seeker posted the theses, China changed the access controls
on CNKI so no one could do such a search again.)
If
a SARS-like virus had emerged in 2012, had been covered up, and the
WIV had been sending people back to the mine to forage for more
samples and bringing them back to Wuhan, that should have been
front-page news the next day. Instead, not a single story appeared
for weeks. A few stories appeared in the UK, including a feature in
the Sunday
Times. The U.S. media took a pass.
"I
was definitely expecting it to blow up all over the news," The
Seeker admits. "The general lack of interest in facts or reason
surprised me. And it still perplexes me that even with all their
resources, the corporate investigative media is lagging terribly."
Within
days, DRASTIC managed to locate
the coordinates of the mysterious Mojiang mine, but it would not
catch the attention of the media until late 2020, when a race
to get there began. The first attempt was by the BBC's
John Sudworth, who found
his path blocked by trucks and guards. (Sudworth would soon be
forced to leave China because of his reporting.) The AP
tried around the same time, with no better luck. Later, teams
from NBC, CBS,
Today, and other outlets also found their way blocked by trucks,
trees, and angry men. Some were told that it was dangerous to proceed
because of wild elephants. Eventually, a Wall Street Journal reporter
reached the entrance to the mine by mountain bike—only to be
detained for five hours of questioning. The mine's secrets remain.
A
Huge Sudoku Puzzle
Although
the Moijang mine revelation in May 2020 got nowhere in the media, it
attracted new members to DRASTIC, which was able to expand its
intelligence gathering to cover everything from viral genetics to
biolab safety protocols. On May 21, 2020, Billy Bostickson dubbed
the group "DRASTIC Research." He also began organizing
the team into subgroups to focus on different aspects of the case.
Soon, they were regularly posting discoveries that made lab
involvement seem more likely.
A
key team member was Francisco de Asis de Ribera, a Madrid data
scientist who excels at mining big data sets. Over the years, the WIV
had published a huge amount of information about its virus-hunting
projects in different outlets and formats. Ribera began assembling it
all into "a huge Sudoku puzzle," searching for places where
he could fill in some of the blanks, slowly assembling a
comprehensive map of the WIV's entire virus program. He and The
Seeker made a formidable team, The Seeker unearthing new pieces of
the puzzle and Ribera fitting them into place. ("I have always
seen myself and Francisco as playing Detective McNulty and Detective
Freamon from The Wire," The Seeker joked to Newsweek in one
message.)
Ribera
was responsible for solving another piece of the RaTG13 puzzle. Had
the WIV been actively working on RaTG13 during the seven years since
they discovered it? Peter Daszak said no: they had never used the
virus because it wasn't similar enough to the original SARS. "We
thought it's interesting, but not high-risk," he
told Wired. "So we didn't do anything about it and put it in
the freezer."
Ribera
disproved that account. When a new science paper on genetics is
published, the authors must upload the accompanying genetic sequences
to an international database. By examining some metadata tags that
had been accidentally uploaded by the WIV along with its genetic
sequences for RaTG13, Ribera discovered
that scientists at the lab had indeed been actively studying the
virus in 2017 and 2018—they hadn't stuck it in a freezer and
forgotten about it, after all.
In
fact, the WIV had been intensely interested in RaTG13 and everything
else that had come from the Mojiang mineshaft. From his giant Sudoku
puzzle, Ribera determined that they made at least seven different
trips to the mine, over many years, collecting thousands of samples.
Ribera's guess is that their technology had not been good enough in
2012 and 2013 to find the virus that had killed the miners, so they
kept going back as the techniques improved.
He
also made a bold prediction. Cross-referencing snippets of
information from multiple sources, Ribera guessed, in a Twitter
thread
dated August 1, 2020, that a cluster of eight SARS-related viruses
mentioned briefly in an obscure section of one WIV paper had actually
also come from the Mojiang mine. In other words, they hadn't found
one relative of SARS-CoV-2 in that mineshaft; they'd found nine. In
November 2020, Shi Zhengli confirmed many of DRASTIC's suspicions
about the Mojiang cave in an
addendum to her original paper on RaTG13 and in a talk in
February 2021.
Of
course, the only reason Ribera has had to perform such Sherlockian
feats is because the WIV has not shared the data investigators have
asked for. The WIV maintained a database on its website with all the
data on the viruses in its collection, including the many unpublished
ones, but that page on its website has been empty for some time. When
asked about the missing database in January 2021, Shi Zhengli
explained
that it had been taken offline during the pandemic because the WIV
web server had become the focus of online attacks. But once again,
DRASTIC poked holes in this explanation: the database was taken
down on September 12, 2019, shortly before the start of the
pandemic, and well before the WIV would have become a target.
Other
databases yielded other clues. In the WIV's grant applications and
awards, The Seeker found
detailed descriptions of the Institute's research plans, and they
were damning: Projects were underway to test the infectivity of novel
SARS-like viruses they'd discovered in human cells and in lab
animals, to see how they might mutate as they crossed species, and to
genetically recombine pieces of different viruses—all being done at
woefully
inadequate biosecurity levels. All the elements for a disaster
were on hand.
Of
course, that is not proof that a disaster took place. Barring
unlikely eyewitness testimony, we may never have that. But all the
evidence DRASTIC has produced points in the same direction: The Wuhan
Institute of Virology had spent years collecting dangerous
coronaviruses, some
of which it has never revealed to the world. It was actively
testing these viruses to determine their ability to infect people, as
well as what mutations might be necessary to enhance that
ability—likely with the ultimate goal of producing a vaccine that
would protect against all of them. And the ongoing effort to cover
this up implies that something may have gone wrong.
Going
Mainstream
By
early 2021, DRASTIC had produced so much information that no one
could keep up, not even its own researchers, so they launched their
own website as a
repository. The site contains enough science papers, Twitter threads,
translations of Chinese documents and links to articles to keep a
curious gumshoe busy for months.
Increasingly,
those gumshoes are professional journalists and scientists. "Rossana
Segreto and Yuri Deigin are my heroes," says the writer
Nicholson Baker, who published an influential
feature on the lab-leak theory in New York magazine. "They
combed through the research and made inspired connections and
uncovered crucial pieces of the story that needed to be told. Same
goes for Mona Rahalkar and Billy Bostickson. Crowd-sourced scientific
muckraking."
The
UK journalist Ian Birrell concurs. "There is no doubt their
collective efforts...have been crucial in challenging both China and
the scientific establishment to ensure the lab leak theory is
properly investigated," he wrote in Unherd.
"It has been fascinating to see, in the course of my
investigations over the past year, how this group of activists—in
tandem with a few brave scientists—has forced the lab leak
hypothesis from the shadows."
One
of those scientists was Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard who recognized the value of the
information DRASTIC was producing and began to interpret it for
scientists and nonscientists alike in crisp explainers on Twitter
that made her a star science communicator. Chan acknowledged the
group's accomplishments in a long thread
on Twitter. "Without the work done by the DRASTIC team, I don't
really know where we would be today with the origins of covid-19,"
she wrote, adding, "The work of these outsiders...has had a
measurable impact on the scientific discourse."
That
scientific discourse jumped tracks on January 6, 2021, when the
University of Washington virologist Jesse Bloom, one of the country's
most respected COVID-19 researchers, became the first major
scientific figure to publicly legitimize DRASTIC's contributions.
"Yes, I follow the work," he tweeted,
sending tremors through the scientific establishment. "I don't
agree [with] all of it, but some parts seem important & correct."
Bloom singled out Mona
Rahalkar's paper on the Mojiang mine, then added that in the
early days of the pandemic, "I thought lab escape very unlikely.
Based on subsequent work, I now say quite plausible."
Other
scientists pressured Bloom to reconsider, but he held his ground, and
the wall of silence began to crumble. In May, 17 scientists from
Harvard, Yale, MIT, Stanford, and other leading institutions,
including Chan, joined Bloom in a
letter in Science calling for a thorough investigation of the
Wuhan lab.
On
nearly the same day, The Seeker struck
again. Visiting a database hosted by China's Ministry of Science
and Technology, he searched for all theses supervised by Shi Zhengli.
Boom. Three hits. "I got it on my first try," he says. "Not
sure why no one else thought of this before, but I guess no one was
looking."
If
there had been any remaining doubt about the WIV's pattern of
deception, these new theses put it to rest. They indicated that the
WIV researchers had never believed a fungus had killed the Mojiang
miners, contradicting Shi's remarks in Scientific American and
elsewhere. In fact, WIV researchers had been so concerned about a new
SARS-like outbreak that they'd
tested the blood of neighboring villagers for other cases. And
they had known
the genetic sequences for the eight other SARS-like viruses from
the mine—which could have helped researchers to understand more
about SARS-CoV-2 in the early days —long before the pandemic
started, and had kept the information to themselves, until DRASTIC
called them out.
Within
days of the new revelations and the Science letter, more academics,
politicians and even the mainstream media began to take the lab-leak
seriously, culminating on May 26 when President
Biden ordered U.S. intelligence agencies "to redouble their
efforts to collect and analyze information that could bring us closer
to a definitive conclusion." Biden promised that "the
United States will also keep working with like-minded partners around
the world to press China to participate in a full, transparent,
evidence-based international investigation and to provide access to
all relevant data and evidence."
So
far China has been ice-cool to the suggestion. It may never cooperate
with an investigation. But it's now clear that the question of
whether a biolab could have caused this pandemic—and could cause
the next—is going to be explored in a way that might never have
happened if a radical and decentralized group of outsiders hadn't
challenged the status quo.
That's
a lesson The Seeker won't soon forget. "I no longer see science
as an exclusive domain," he wrote to Newsweek. "Everyone
can make a difference."
Tucker
Carlson: Is Dr. Fauci under criminal investigation?
The
utter fraudulence of Tony
Fauci is obvious now, and it’s widely acknowledged. But it was
not always obvious. In March of last year, we interviewed Fauci on
this show. We treated him with respect. We took his answers
seriously. We’re Americans, so we assumed the man in charge of
protecting the United States from COVID
must be impressive and rational. We also assumed he was
honest.
But
we were wrong. It soon became clear that Tony Fauci was just another
sleazy federal bureaucrat — deeply political and often
dishonest. More shocking, we then learned that Fauci himself was
implicated in the very pandemic he’d been charged with fighting.
Fauci supported the grotesque and dangerous experiments that appear
to have made COVID possible.
We
came to these conclusions incrementally, spurred by evidence that
accumulated over the course of a year. Tonight, we have the
mother-load. Thanks to a freedom of information request from
Buzzfeed, we have thousands of emails to and from Tony Fauci, going
back to the early winter of 2020. Collectively, they show that from
the beginning, Fauci was worried the public might conclude that COVID
originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Why was Fauci be
concerned that Americans would conclude that? Possibly because Tony
Fauci knew perfectly well he’d funded gain-of-function experiments
at that same laboratory.
The
emails prove Fauci lied about this under oath.
But
we were wrong. It soon became clear that Tony Fauci was just another
sleazy federal bureaucrat — deeply political and often
dishonest. More shocking, we then learned that Fauci himself was
implicated in the very pandemic he’d been charged with fighting.
Fauci supported the grotesque and dangerous experiments that appear
to have made COVID possible.
We
came to these conclusions incrementally, spurred by evidence that
accumulated over the course of a year. Tonight, we have the
mother-load. Thanks to a freedom of information request from
Buzzfeed, we have thousands of emails to and from Tony Fauci, going
back to the early winter of 2020. Collectively, they show that from
the beginning, Fauci was worried the public might conclude that COVID
originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Why was Fauci be
concerned that Americans would conclude that? Possibly because Tony
Fauci knew perfectly well he’d funded gain-of-function experiments
at that same laboratory.
The
emails prove Fauci lied about this under oath.
Consider
this exchange, which began the evening of January 31, 2020. It was a
Friday, just before midnight.
The
first email came from an immunologist called Kristian Andersen, who
works at the Scripps Research Institute in California. Andersen
warned Fauci that COVID appeared to have been manipulated in a
laboratory.
"The
unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the
genome (less than point one percent), so one has to look really
closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features
(potentially) look engineered."
The
next day, on February 1, Tony Fauci wrote back, "Thanks,
Kristian. Talk soon on the call."
Fauci
then sent an urgent email to his top deputy, Hugh Auchincloss. The
subject of his email, in all-caps, was "IMPORTANT."
"Hugh:
It is essential that we speak this AM. Keep your cell phone on. Read
this paper as well as the email that I will forward you know. You
will have tasks today that must be done."
Attached
to the email was a document entitled, "Baric, Shi, et al --
Nature Medicine -- SARS Gain of Function.pdf."
The
"Baric" in that attachment refers to Ralph Baric, a
virologist based in the United States who collaborated with the Wuhan
Institute of Virology.
Baric
worked with a woman called Dr. Shi Zhengli -- known as the "Bat
Lady," because she manipulates coronaviruses that infect bats.
Keep
in mind that during questioning from Senator Rand
Paul of Kentucky, Tony Fauci denied that this same Ralph Baric
had conducted gain-of-function research. Again, this is the Ralph
Baric in Fauci’s attachment entitled, "Baric, Shi et al - SARS
Gain of Function." Yet, under oath, Fauci denied it:
DR
FAUCI: Dr. Baric does not do gain function research. And if it
is, it's according to the guidelines and it is being conducted in
North Carolina…And if you look at the grant and you look at the
progress reports, it is not gain function despite the fact that
people tweet that.
Oh,
it wasn’t just on Twitter. It was in Fauci’s own emails.
In
retrospect, that looks a lot like perjury. We do know that starting
early last year, a lot of people at NIH were worried that COVID had
not occurred naturally — that it had instead been manipulated in a
lab in China
– and yet they seemed determined to hide that fact from the public.
Why?
On
the afternoon of February first last year, Fauci held a conference
call with several top virologists. Most of the details of that call
remain hidden from public view. They’ve been redacted. We know the
call was related to a document entitled, "coronavirus sequence
comparison."
Jeremy
Farrar, a British physician who runs a major research nonprofit,
reminded everyone on the call that what they said was top-secret.
"Information
and discussion is shared in total confidence and not to be shared
until agreement on next steps," he wrote.
In
other emails, Jeremy Farrar passed along an article from the website
ZeroHedge, suggesting that the coronavirus might have been created as
a bioweapon.
We
now know that’s a more plausible explanation than the one we
believed at first and were told by the media which is that
coronavirus came from a pangolin.
But
for the crime of saying it out loud, a more plausible explanation,
ZeroHedge was banned from social media platforms. Until recently, you
weren’t allowed to suggest that COVID might be manmade.
Why?
The fact-checkers wouldn’t allow it. Why wouldn’t they? Because
Tony Fauci assured the tech
monopolies
that the coronavirus could not have been manmade. So the tech giants
shut down the topic. Fauci lied.
FAUCI:
A group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the
sequences there and the sequences in bats as they evolve, and the
mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally
consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.
That
was April 17, 2020. Very shortly into the course of this pandemic. At
that point, what Tony Fauci just asserted as known could not have
conclusively been known. That was a lie. Tony Fauci suggested that he
knew because top researchers had decided conclusively, that this must
have jumped naturally from an animal to a human being. That was
dishonest.
Two
days later, one of the virologists Tony Fauci was funding to conduct
dangerous coronavirus experiments in Wuhan wrote to thank him for thehelp.
That man, Peter Daszak, complained to Fauci that the American tax
dollars he’d taken for these experiments were being "publicly
targeted by Fox News reporters." Yet he remained grateful for
Tony Fauci’s support.
"I
just wanted to say a personal thank you on behalf of our staff and
collaborators," he wrote.
Strangely,
most of this specific email from Daszak to Fauci has been redacted
under FOIA section (b)(7)(A). That specific exemption to disclosure
applies to: "records or information compiled for law
enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that production could
reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings."
Are
Dazak and Fauci under criminal investigation? We can only hope they
are. They certainly deserve it. At this point, we can’t say for
sure. We do know that Fauci hasn't just lied about the origins of
COVID, pretending to know things he could not know. He’s also lied
about vaccines
in key ways.
In
March of last year, former Obama official Zeke Emanuel wrote to Fauci
to ask a simple question, one that we’ve asked countless times: Are
people who’ve recovered from COVID generally immune from
re-infection? That applies to about 100 million Americans, so
it’s not a small question.
Fauci’s
response: "No evidence in this regard, but you would assume that
there would be substantial immunity post-infection."
Yes,
you would assume that. We always have. And in fact, studies now show
it’s true. People who’ve had COVID and recovered almost never get
sick again from COVID. They don’t need to be vaccinated. Yet to
this day, Fauci has never admitted that in public. In his email to
Zeke Emmanuel, he admitted something else that’s also now obvious:
surgical mask, the paper kind all of us wear, don’t really work.
They offer very little protection from COVID. In fact, at least one
study shows they may accelerate the transmission of viruses. They’re
a form of make-believe. Yet, once again, while under oath in public,
Fauci claimed precisely the opposite.
SEN.
RAND PAUL: You’re telling everybody to wear a mask, whether they’ve
had an infection or a vaccine. What I’m saying is they have
immunity and everybody agrees they have immunity. What studies do you
have that people that have had the vaccine or have had the infection
are spreading the infection? If we’re not spreading the infection,
isn’t it just theater?
DR.
FAUCI: No, it’s not-
SEN.
PAUL: If you’ve had a vaccine and you’re wearing two masks, isn’t
that theater?
DR.
FAUCI: No, that’s not. Here we go again with the theater.
DR.
FAUCI: Let me just state for the record that masks are not theater.
Masks are protective and we ask- Sen. Paul: If they have immunity,
they are theater. If you already have immunity, you’re wearing a
mask to give comfort to others. You’re not wearing a mask because
of because of any science.
DR.
FAUCI: I totally disagree with you.
Rand
Paul is a physician. He’s smart. What he just said was true,
and the science shows that it’s true. There’s not much debate
about it, actually, among honest people.
But
Tony Fauci claimed it wasn’t true. He lied. Why would he do that?
Well, here’s one reason: the emails show that Tony Fauci speaks
regularly to Bill
Gates.
Bill
Gates isn’t a doctor. Bill Gates isn’t a scientist. Bill Gates is
a very rich man who made billions making mediocre software for office
computers. So why would Tony Fauci be in such regular contact with
Bill Gates?
Yet
the term "Bill Gates" comes up more than two dozen times in
the Fauci emails. Has Bill Gates profited in any way from Tony
Fauci’s COVID guidance? That would definitely be worth knowing.
Immediately. And yet we don’t know. Our media don’t seem
interested in finding out. Here's how CNN covered the emails today.
"Thousands of emails from and to Dr. Fauci reveal the weight
that came with his role as a rare source of frank honesty within the
Trump administration's COVID-19 task force."
Can
you imagine a more dishonest characterization of anything than that?
It’s hard to.
By
the way, it wasn’t just CNN. No reporters asked about these emails
at today's White House briefing. Not one question. But you shouldn’t
be surprised. Of course, they didn’t ask. Fauci’s too big to
question that at this point.
"Oh
my god," one Biden voter wrote to him back in March. "Is
there anything I can do for you, besides being grateful;?”
"Wash
my feet with your tears," Fauci may have responded. We can’t
say that he did respond that way for certain. We don’t have his
reply. We do know that in affluent neighborhoods throughout
Washington D.C., you can still see signs that say "Thank you,
Dr. Fauci." What does that tell you?
It
tells you that Tony Fauci is no longer a scientist, assuming he ever
was. He’s a figure of religious veneration — Jesus for people who
don’t believe in God.
This
article is adapted from Tucker Carlson's opening commentary on the
June 2, 2021, edition of "Tucker Carlson Tonight."
THE
MOTHER FUCKER FAUCI CONDONED “FIELD TESTING” LETHAL MAN MADE
“VIRUSES”. Israel just declared they used AI in their attack on
Gaza. They too are “field testing”.
What
are wars but “field tests” for lethal weapons and military
tactics. “What does this do?” “Can this destroy that?” “Will this
penetrate that?”
MILITARY
HARDWARE has to be tested in “battle field” conditions to
determine reliability and trustworthiness, if the manufacturers who
made a bid hope to have a snowball's chance in hell of getting the
manufacturing contract.
Never before have there been
massive excess deaths following
vaccination.
Never before have there been
children, young adults, athletes in
their prime, entertainers, dropping dead “cause unknown”
following vaccination.
Of course, the cause is known.
The leading doctors and medical
scientists of our time–which excludes health agency bureaucrats,
such as Fauci, who serve as marketing agents for Big Pharma and
corrupt, politicized state medical boards and HMOs–have explained
why and how the mRNA “vaccines,” which are not vaccines, kill,
destroy the immune system, and cause health injuries. What is not
known is why some die immediately after receiving the deadly
substance, others a month later, and others remain, so far, alive.
Some researchers think the content of the “vaccines” differed by
lot, and some think some of the jabs were placebos for the purpose of
producing an uninjured cadre to tout the safety of the jabs.
About half of Americans believe
that the COVID-19 vaccines have
caused side effects that have contributed to a significant number of
unexplained deaths, according to a new survey.
The survey by
Rasmussen Reports, which was conducted from Dec. 28 to 30, found 49
percent of American Adults believe it’s likely that side effects of
COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained
deaths, including 28 percent who considered it “very likely.”
Ever since covid “vaccines” were
unleashed under Operation
Warp Speed, excess deaths have soared across the developed world.
Most notably in recent days, Japan, which fared relatively well
throughout the scamdemic pre-jab, has seen soaring
rates of excess death – especially after the latest covid
“boosters” were released by Pfizer.
Japan’s third-dose “booster shot”
program commenced on Dec.
1, 2021, resulting in 83 percent of the country being “fully
vaccinated” by the end of 2022. With that came the highest number
of excess deaths Japan has seen in 11 years.
“Excess deaths were approximately
four times the number of those
in the years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021,” reported The
Exposé.
But wait: where is 2020
in that mix? We are glad you
asked because it turns out that 2020, before the
so-called “vaccines” were unleashed, saw the least number
of excess deaths compared to all nine years prior.
The Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) has come out
with a guide for how we are all to speak and write. This can be found
on the website titled, “Preferred
Terms for Select Population Groups & Communities.” It is
clear that this list is being read and distributed broadly – from
medical institutions, hospitals, scientific communications, doctor’s
offices, schools and universities, as well as other US Government
agencies and institutes.
The CDC is the arm of the US
Government tasked with disease
control and prevention. It is not tasked with correcting wrong-speak.
Now, how exactly this guide fits
in with the CDC mission is beyond
me. Here is what the CDC lists as their mission on their website:
Former White House adviser Dr.
Scott Atlas, the Robert Wesson
Senior Fellow in health policy at Stanford University's Hoover
Institute, wrote an
excellent essay recently in the Wall Street Journal.
In it, he raisesa
vital question for all students, parents, faculty, and the broader
public, as to how our nation's university system became, along with
major media, the most aggressive proponent and distributor of medical
ideology and biosecurity policy. University
behavior continues to be directed by the CDC and WHO, and it appears
that university administration will continue its commitment to a
consensus posture toward the COVID phenomenon, until another
institution that it considers authoritative tells it
otherwise. That
is not likely to happen.
Academia will never
account for its misguided COVID policies, and it will never back
out of its commitment to consensus explanations or
opportunities. Indeed, these people will
help accelerate the entire COVID complex. COVID is a new
social engineering program, and universities will make biosecurity,
including molecular engineering and tracking technology, into a
permanent research activity that is worth billions per year in
funding and commercialization. The link connecting
business, government, and higher education has never been stronger,
while China-style social credit scoring, based in part on medical and
ideological compliance, is considered by the current White House
administration a necessary part of the political agenda.
After all of the criticism I’ve
directed toward Coronamaniacs
and the Vaxxmongers over the past three years - in-person and online
- I know that many of them have wished that I’d get very sick and
die “from Covid.” If I had, they would have gleefully jeered me,
as many did when lockdown critic Herman Cain died. Bear in mind that
Mr. Cain was 74 and had Stage IV cancer.
But I haven’t died “from Covid.”
Like the super-vast
majority of people, I was never at any risk of doing so.
While I’d prefer to
never get sick, I always knew it was possible that I might “get
Covid,” just as I had gotten some other, prior, unnamed
coronavirus-driven colds or flus. It’s how life is, has been and
will always be. Many people
seem to be sick lately. It doesn’t help immune function to be in
the low light/low Vitamin D state of winter. And during the past
three years of disrupted social life, our immune systems haven’t
been properly tested.
Many have said that, by Spring,
2022, everyone had been exposed to
Covid-causing coronaviruses. Maybe it’s true, though it sounds like
hyperbole; I’m not sure how this could be known. Regardless, except
for one February, 2020 day of malaise, and then a week-long dry cough
with no apparent cause—perhaps a quick, nearly asymptomatic,
pre-Lockdown brush with Covid, or perhaps nothing at all—I’ve
felt fine for the past three years.
Last week, on the day
after Christmas, that changed.
My muscles started to ache. These
aches spread and lasted for
three days, accompanied by a tight chest and a banging headache. On
Day 2, I also got a high fever. I let the fever crest until I took
some Tylenol to moderate my temperature. Serial doses over the next
two days quelled the headaches. My wife got sick the day after I did
and exhibited the same symptoms.
By our respective Day 4s,
we each felt much better.
Aside from the fever, we didn’t
have the publicized, original
Covid symptoms: shortness of breath, dry cough and fatigue. Plus, for
what it’s worth, we each tested negative on home antigen tests that
my wife had gotten in the mail. Thus, we mutually guessed that we
probably had some form of flu. I didn’t care whether or not I had
“had Covid.” That diagnosis never scared me. I only cared that we
felt sick for three days.
The researchers in this study
looked at blood samples from 16
myocarditis patients, confirmed to have high levels of serum cardiac
troponin T. All developed myocarditis after receiving the COVID-19
vaccine, typically within a week of the second dose. However, a few
became sick after the first dose or booster dose. Over 80% were male.
They were studied by antibody
profiling, including antibodies to
the virus, autoantibodies or antibodies to the virome, and the
analysis of T cells specifically directed against the virus. In
addition, cytokine and antigen profiles were determined. These
measurements were compared with those of 45 vaccinated controls, who
were of similar age and health.
The following video interview
with Prof. Michel
Chossudovsky pertains to the Confidential Pfizer
Report released as part of a Freedom of Information (FOI) procedure.
The report is a bombshell.
The vaccine was launched in
mid-December 2020. By the end of February 2021, “Pfizer
had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly
caused by the vaccine and tens of
thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases
of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000
reports of cardiac disorders.”
This Confidential
Pfizer Report provides
data on deaths and adverse events recorded by Pfizer from the outset
of the vaccine project in December 2020 to the end
of February
2021, namely a very short period (at most two and a
half months).
The data from
mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 unequivocally confirms
“Manslaughter”. Based on the evidence, Pfizer had the
responsibility to immediately cancel and withdraw the “vaccine”.
Pfizer’s Worldwide
marketing of the Covid-19 Vaccine beyond February 28th, 2021, is no
longer an “Act of Manslaughter”.
Murder as opposed to
Manslaughter implies “Criminal Intent”.
Pfizer’s
Covid 19 Vaccine constitutes a Criminal Act. From a legal
standpoint it is an “Act of Murder” applied Worldwide to a
target population of 8 billion people.
Remember Event
201 of 18
October 2019 in NYC, hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health
Security, in partnership with the WEF (World Economic Forum) and the
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation? Of course, WHO was also present,
and so were all the Globalist players, including the World Bank, IMF
and – of indeed the UN and many of its sub-organization. See this.
This was a “tabletop” simulation,
as they call it – of a
corona pandemic that may hit the entire world population “one of
these days”…
It happened less than three
months later. The rest is history.
Now, the same suspects, replacing
officially the WEF by WHO as a
key sponsor, used the Event of the Grand Challenges
Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022 for
a similar “tabletop” exercise, this time called “Catastrophic
Contagion” – see this.
Is it a coincidence that the
venue of this Event is Brussels,
Headquarters of the EU and NATO?
Strange that this surfaced only
now. And be assured, the WEF was
omni-present.
In fact, without the WEF nothing
of this kind would happen.
Because the WEF is the Executing Branch of Big Finance – the
corporate finance-digito-military complex, that directs the world
from the shadows of Washington.
It is strange that hardly
anything surfaced from this event for
almost two months. Why was it kept secret until now?
Well, instead of, or in addition
to the vassalic UN organizations
and Washington controlled financial institutions, like World Bank and
IMF – they invited an extraordinary group of participants,
consisting of 10 current and former Health Ministers and senior
public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola,
Liberia, Singapore, India, Germany. Of particular interest are
African countries.
Excess mortality is reported
from Norway – and all over the
western world or Global North. Excesses never heard before. In the
ranges of between 15% and 25%. In some countries even higher.
Worrisome. No clear causes can be detected.
Already more than a year ago Dr.
Michael Yeadon,
former VP Pfizer and Chief of Science at Pfizer, warned that excess
deaths will appear in the next 3-5 and even up to ten years,
because of the false and criminal, untested mRNA vaxxes.
He elaborates. After all the
boosters – 3 to 4 shots – the
immune system has lost up to 80% of its defenses. Thus, people are
more vulnerable to catching any kind of disease. Plus, myocarditis
and sudden deaths are on the rise – even in young people,
especially those who practice sport or are sports professionals.
In addition, graphene oxide
injection and other concoctions being
injected, cause all sorts of cancers, mostly in reproductive systems
of men and women, as well as several types of cancers of the blood,
of the eyes causing blindness… liver and kidney diseases… and
much more.
In addition, these injections,
called vaccines, also cause massive
infertility. In some countries life-childbirth was down by up to 40%
in 2022.
Dr. Yeadon warned that the
diseases will be very difficult to
trace back to the vaxxes, but that’s where the origin is.
A clear eugenics agenda, mass
depopulation, unprecedented.
MOTIVE & OPPORTUNITY
TO INTENTIONALLY HARM PEOPLE!
IF YOU'RE IN GOOD HEALTH THEY DON'T EARN NOR DO THE INVESTORS PROFIT!
There is evidence showing
that the most toxic part of SARS-CoV-2,
the spike protein, is acting like a prion, or a misfolded protein
that has the ability to transmit its misfolded shape onto normal
variants of the same protein. Proliferation of prions in the brain is
associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s,
Alzheimer’s, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), and amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis (ALS).
In this interview with The
New American, MIT scientist Dr.
Stephanie Seneff discusses the pre-print article titled “SARS-CoV-2
Spike Protein in the Pathogenesis of Prion-like Diseases” and
explains the deadly mechanisms by which mRNA-induced spike protein
wreaks havoc in the human body, and in the brain in particular.
Remarkably, some of the blood cells can continuously produce spike
protein for months after vaccination, possibly through reverse
transcription of the mRNA into DNA, which amplifies the damage.
The doctor touched on the
hypothesis of the late Nobel Prize
laureate Dr. Luc Montagnier on the inserts of Human Immunodeficiency
Virus (HIV) in SARS-CoV-2 genome and argued that the virus was most
likely engineered as a bioweapon. Still, while the spike proteins
from the natural Covid infection do pose the discussed risk, it is
nowhere near the damage potentially inflicted on one’s body by the
vaccine-related mRNA-induced spike proteins, observed Dr. Seneff.
The doctor urged the parents
not to vaccinate their children with
mRNA shots because of the wide spectrum of harm that they inflict.
Dr.
McCullough: The C19 Shots Sets Up Heart Inflammation and Adrenaline
Triggers Injury and Death "The vaccines set up the heart
inflammation ... and then it's the big surge of adrenaline ... during
a basketball game — during sports, that's triggering these deaths."
"That there is a citizenship
of the United States and citizenship of a state",... Tashiro v. Jordan
(1927) 201 Cal. 236
"We have in
our political system a government of the United States and a government
of
each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct
from the others, and
each hascitizens of it's own..." United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542
(1875)
©
Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post Trump, Fauci and Health and Human
Services Secretary Alex… 
