Your Car
Are You Sure
You Drive?
License - DMV
DRIVING Verb "Traffic Stop"






Court
Parking Scam
RETAILERS - SALES TAX FRAUD  FASCISM HISTORY






MONEY
DEMOCRACY RED FLAG LAWS
SLAVERY
YOUR GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES
KNOW THE LAW






California Court Decisions
to 1850
Codes of California THE CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FAMOUS QUOTES The History 101
(Videos)
Your Government 101
(Videos)






DRIVING IS COMMERCE
(Videos)
Law Enforcement Employees
(COPS)
NO TRESPASSING
GEN. SMEDLY BUTLER THE BONUS ARMY FREE BOOKS






TRESPASS
TREASON
CITIZENSHIP
WHAT'S A TORT
VACCINE FRAUD
VAXX HEADLINES









NEWS SITES

&
LAW & OTHER INFO SITES


KTLA Los Angeles KCBS-TV Los Angeles KNBC Los Angeles KABC-TV Los Angeles C-SPAN TV SCHEDULE KCET Los Angeles
(PBS)






KTVU Oakland KRON-TV San Francisco KPIX-TV San Francisco KGO-TV San Francisco KQED San Francisco (PBS) KNTV San Jose






What Really Happened
Gateway Pundit
Citizen Free Press
Red State News
Revolver News
Rense






New York Post
Republic Brief
Lew Rockwell
American Thinker
Federalist
Conservative Brief






Town Hall
YouTube
JUJUBOT - Live news feeds
Bitchute Video Platform
Rumble
Judicial Watch






Freedom Watch
Newsmax
Rebel News (Canada)
Glenn Greenwald
Just The News
The Unz Review






NATURAL NEWS
The Health Ranger
Jon Rappaport
David Icke
NewsWars
American Center For Law And Justice






Jonathan Turley
Judge Andrew Napolitano Opinions
Just The News
Zero Hedge
Investment Watch
Global Research






100PERCENTFEDUP
Government Slaves
THE FREE THOUGHT PROJECT
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE
INTELLIHUB
CONSTITUTION SOCIETY






Avalon Project
Yale Law School

The Federalist Papers
THE ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPERS
Debates in the Federal Convention
of 1787
by James Madison

Mark Dice
Joe Rogan


OTHER STUFF

Wolfram Alpha
Deviant Art
Giphy
Da Font
(Need a font?  They're all free!)
Pinterest
Speed Test
(Check your DOWN and UP signal)






THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE
MrMBB333
thirdphaseofmoon
Praveen Mohan
Brien Foerester
Mystery History I






Mystery History II
vlad9vt
New Earth
Michael Tellinger
Benjamin Fullford
Periscope Films






Vintage Photos
People Are Awsome
Dude Perfect
Useful Charts
Graham Hancock
Robert Bauval






SLIDE SHOWS MYSTERIES 101
(Videos)
LYRICS
INTERNET ARCHIVE
(What are you looking
for?  It's probably here!)











FREE SOFTWARE ECT.








FILE HIPPO
TUCOWS
MAJOR GEEKS
FilePuma
SOURCE FORGE
BitLord
(For Torrent files,and lots more)

1337X
(EXCELLENT Torrent site!)













The following is a list of secure email providers. I am not affiliated with any of them. I am not paid to promote them. I do not vouch for any of them. The links are provided for you to evaluate relative to your needs. I use Protonmail and MailFence.  Protonmail is located in Switzerland and Mailfence is located in Germany.




CAVEAT EMPTOR!

ProtonMail
(*) – Truly anonymous & end-to-end encrypted email

Tutanota (*) – Truly secure email with end-to-end encryption throughout the
entire mailbox
Hushmail.com (* )- Canadian provider who has been respecting email privacy
since 1999. Oldest secure email provider.
RiseUp.net (*) – Secure offshore email provider run by non-profit
organization who fights for digital freedom.
TorGuard.net (*)
Blur/MaskMe – Solid email masking service, not a provider.
ShazzleMail
StartMail.com
CryptoHeaven.com
NeoMailBox.com
4SecureMail.com
CounterMail.cm
S-Mail.com
Securenym.net
KeptPrivate.com
Novo-Ordo.com
LockBin.com
SendINC.com – Sends encrypted emails, not actually a provider.
Opolis.eu
OneShar.es – Self destructing emails.
BitMessage.ch
TorMail.org – Tor-based email service now dead after FBI server seizure.

https://freedomhacker.net/list-of-secure-email-providers-that-take-privacy-serious/





Constitution of the State of California

We the people of California, grateful to Almighty; God for our freedom: in order to secure its blessings, do establish this Constitution.
                      
Article I:  Declaration of Rights

Sec. 1.

All men are by nature free and independent, and have certain unalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty: acquiring, possessing and protecting property: and pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness, and privacy.

Sec. 8.

No person shall be subject to be twice put in jeopardy for the same offence; nor shall he be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

Sec. 9.

Every citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press.

Sec. 10.

The people shall have the right freely to assemble together,...
(RIGHT TO TRAVEL)

Sec. 19.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable seizures and searches, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but on probable cause,

(FORMER) Sec. 21.

This enumeration of rights shall not be construed to impair or deny others, retained by the people.














I am a Citizen and one of the people of California Republic.   I travel noncommercially in my personal property (machine) for my personal & household purposes and enjoyment over my streets and highways.



The state has the authority to regulate the use of public highways for business purposes.
Morel v. Railroad Commission of California (1938) 11 Cal.2d 488

"'The right of a citizen to travel upon the highway and transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business differs radically and obviously from that of one who makes the highway his place of business and uses it for private gain,...   The former is the usual and ordinary right of a citizen, a right common to all; while the latter is special, unusual and extraordinary.
Frost v. Railroad Commission (1925) 197 Cal. 230

"The only limitations found restricting the right of the state to condition the use of the public highways as a means of vehicular transportation for compensation are  (1) that the state must not exact of those it permits to use the highways for hauling for gain that they shall surrender any of their inherent U.S. constitutional Rights as a condition precedent to obtaining permission for such use..."
Riley v. Lawson, 143 So. 619
Stephenson v. Binford, 287 US 251
87 ALR (American Law Review) 721

"…the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality, is a fundamental constitutional right which must be protected by the courts."
People v. Horton (1971) 14 Cal.App.3d 930

It is settled that the streets of a city belong to the people of a state and the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen of the state.
Whyte v. City of Sacramento (1924)  65 Cal.App. 534
Escobedo v. State Dept. of Motor Vehicles (1950)  35 Cal.2d 870

"'The streets of a city belong to the people of the state, and every citizen of the state has a right to the use thereof, subject to legislative control ....  "The use of highways for purposes of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right, of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived ...  [A]ll persons have an equal right to use them for purposes of travel by proper means, and with due regard for the corresponding rights of others. [Citations.]"' [Italics added, fns. omitted.]
City of Poway v. City of San Diego, 229 Cal.App.3d 847 [No. D013680. Fourth Dist., Div. One. Apr. 26, 1991.]

[1] "The streets of a city belong to the people of the state, and every citizen of the state has a right to the use thereof, subject to legislative control ....  "'The use of highways for purposes of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right, of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived ...  [A]ll persons have an equal right to use them for purposes of travel by proper means, and with due regard for the corresponding rights of others.'" (Escobedo v. State of California (1950) 35 Cal.2d 870, 875-876 [222 P.2d 1], fn. 4 quoting 25 Am.Jur., Highways, 163, p. 457; italics added.)
Rumford v. City of Berkeley, 31 Cal.3d 545

We conclude that the right to intrastate travel (which includes intramunicipal travel) is a basic human right protected by the United States and California Constitutions as a whole. Such a right is implicit in the concept of a democratic society and is one of the attributes of personal liberty under common law. (See 1 Blackstone, Commentaries 134; U.S. Constitution., art. IV, section 2 and the 5th, 9th and 14th Amends.; Cal. Const., art. I, section 7, subd. (a) and art. I, section 24, which provides: "Rights guaranteed by this Constitution are not dependent on those guaranteed by the United States Constitution. This declaration of rights may not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the People.")
In re White (1979) 97 Cal.App.3d 141






A license proper is a permit to do business which could not be done without the license.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. LIVERPOOL AND LONDON AND GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY et al . (1887) 74 Cal. 113

A license in its proper sense is a permit to do business which could not be done without the license.
CITY OF SONORA v. J. B. CURTIN (1902) 137 Cal. 583

In California, a license is defined as "A permit, granted by an appropriate governmental body, generally for a consideration, to a person or firm, or corporation to pursue some occupation or to carry on some business subject to regulation under the police power."
Rosenblatt v. California (1945) 69 Cal. App. 2d 69






- THE LICENSE PLATE IS EVIDENCE OF COMMERCIAL USE! -